After going through multiple arguments its hard to find an answer. For starters, they believe that going to space will be more beneficial than doing it back on Earth. This all makes sense till you remember that we still cannot land on the Moon or Mars. Another example is Paul D. Lowman Jr., he says, “the last few decades of space exploration and astronomy have shown that the universe is violent and dangerous,” which is a true statement. I mean there are black holes, asteroids, solar flairs, and so many more, but what can we do about them? If we are in space we have no protection, for instant, the moon does not have an ozone layer, so comets and asteroids will hit it full force. They will continue making these statements that going to space now is the better solution, but with the cost to do what most of them want to do it will still be a
After going through multiple arguments its hard to find an answer. For starters, they believe that going to space will be more beneficial than doing it back on Earth. This all makes sense till you remember that we still cannot land on the Moon or Mars. Another example is Paul D. Lowman Jr., he says, “the last few decades of space exploration and astronomy have shown that the universe is violent and dangerous,” which is a true statement. I mean there are black holes, asteroids, solar flairs, and so many more, but what can we do about them? If we are in space we have no protection, for instant, the moon does not have an ozone layer, so comets and asteroids will hit it full force. They will continue making these statements that going to space now is the better solution, but with the cost to do what most of them want to do it will still be a