Autocratic Leadership Style

837 Words 4 Pages
strong motivation and great satisfaction to the leaders who dictate terms. Therefore, the autocratic leadership style yield better results when great speed is needed. To the contrary, sometimes this style might leads to frustration, low morale and conflicts among subordinates. Most of the subordinates also tend to shirk responsibility and initiative.
Democratic style is where the leader decentralises and assigns high authority to his subordinates. This type of leader makes a final decision only after discussion with the subordinates. The communication channel is usually two ways. While delegating a lot of authorities to subordinates, he defines the limits within which people can normally function. Democratic leaders have a high concern for
…show more content…
Under this particular leadership style, a manager gives absolute freedom to his subordinates. The whole decision-making authority is entrusted to them. There is very little or no intervention by the leader and so the group operates entirely on its own. The way of communication is free flow. The manager does not use power but maintains contact with subordinates. Therefore, subordinates have to exercise self-control. The laissez-faire leadership style helps subordinates to develop independent personality. Under this leadership style, there are some numbers of advantages. To begin, it can be illustrated that there is rather a positive effect on job satisfaction and moral of subordinates. Initially, it also gives opportunity to take initiative to the subordinates. There is maximum possible opportunity for development of subordinates. However, certain disadvantages are also affiliated to this type of leadership style which can be overseen or bypassed. Under this leadership style, there is absolutely no leadership at all. The subordinates do not get any direction and instruction or any kind of support on behalf of the leader. The subordinates may proceed in several varied directions and may work at cross purpose which may create problem for the organisation. It can be noted that free rein or laissez-faire leadership style may be suitable when the subordinates are well-trained, highly knowledgeable, self-motivated and …show more content…
The studies began with the assumption that there was no exact definition of leadership that really existed and also no exact indication of a good leader. Therefore, it desire to define leadership in terms of performance. Researchers at Ohio State University uses many different techniques and ways as well as observing leaders in laboratory setting up as well as surveying then, in order to understand behaviours of effective leaders. It also highlighted that leadership style which is high in initiating structure as well as high in consideration, generally have positive outcomes. This research stream led to the discovery of two categories of behaviour namely task-oriented behaviours which is sometimes called initiating structure and people-oriented behaviours which is also called consideration. These two categories of behaviour mean more or less the same things as task behaviour and relationship behaviour of a leader. Task-oriented behaviours is about structuring the roles of subordinates, providing them with instructions and behaving in ways that will raise the performance of the group. Task-oriented behaviours are directives given to employees to get things done and to ensure that organisational goals are met. It also relate to the extent to which a leader is likely to define and

Related Documents