Is It Ethical To Use Animals As Testing Subjects Essay

Improved Essays
Is it ethical to use animals as testing subjects? This is a common question among us all, especially scientists, and various animal activists. Personally, the answer to this question is two-sided, because it is as wrong using animals as testing subjects, as it would be difficult to stop using them because that would mean no testing of drugs before administering them to humans. It is just wrong to think that a rat can be estimated to humans. Additionally, animals do not exhibit human diseases such as HIV, Alzheimer's disease and many more. Therefore, it sounds useless to think that testing drugs to these diseases using animals will give accurate results (Slattery & Cryan, 2012). Apart from this, using these animals as test subjects also greatly violates the animal rights, because animals just like humans have feelings and deserve to be treated right. However, if not for the use of these animals, the medicine world would be stagnant. However, the use of animals as testing subjects should be banned, because it greatly invades animals’ rights and puts the animals through a lot of pain and suffering.
First, animals should not be used as testing subjects because
…show more content…
Therefore, the act of using them as test subjects is not justifiable by any means, especially because humans and animals do not have similar bodies, and some diseases such as HIV-AIDS do not attack animals. Hence, testing for such diseases’ drugs on animals may not offer conclusive results. Moreover, use of animal tests greatly infringes animal rights, because just like humans, animals also have their rights. Additionally, such tests greatly inflict a lot of pain and suffering to these animals, because some of the tests run on them are quite painful and in most cases deadly. Therefore, animals should be treated with consideration and care and not as test

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some claim it is better to use animals as testing subjects rather than humans. However, that is one of the main areas that they are misguided in. While yes, it is good if humans can stop others from being used as test subjects, using animals as testing subjects does not help humans. Instead, there is another possibility that helps both humans and animals, and none of them have to receive pain. Despite that, since using other methods of testing can be a little more complex, many companies do not want to execute it, sticking to the old fashioned way.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animals don’t deserve to be tested or harm in anyway because they didn’t do anything. Animals should have at least some rights so we can improve how animals are abused, tested, and disrespected by humans. Would you want your pet to be taken away for testing? Would you want to watch the brutality of it? If not, then why let another animal go through this.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animal Experimentation Animal Experimentation has been a problem and it still remains being one of the biggest problems. Most people agree that animal experimentation should be banned but there is no agreement of what the outcome would be. Although, there are other ways of getting results without testing on animals which are, human tissue, drug trials, genetic testing, etc. Other people think animal testing is the best way because some animals have an organism as a human like traits such as mice, rats, cats, monkeys, pigs etc. Sometimes testing on an animal does not completely match with a human body reaction towards the outcome of the research from an animal.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is a completely pointless thing to do, and creates many negative effects on both animals and people. It is an awful and disgusting thing to do to another living creature with similar feelings to a person, and should not be allowed in our modern world today. The purpose of animal testing is to test the safety and hypoallergenic reactions of cosmetic products and medical drugs on animals to make sure people will not get hurt from these potentially…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fox, an ethical philosopher, “Animals do not have ‘rights’ equivalent to humans due to their exclusion from the human ‘moral community’” (Baier 137-138). This “community” includes having a sense of time, being able to make decisions and having a sense of self-awareness (Baier 138). Therefore, testing on animals is more ethical than on humans, based on their inferior status. On the other hand, Peter Singer is against animal testing on the basis that animals do feel an extraordinary amount of pain and should have as many rights as humans. Animals should have equal rights just like…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A drug tested on animals to prove if it’s safe for humans is a very risky move because all drugs affect various species differently. Lastly, do we have the right to test on these creatures? ”There is no doubt that animals experience a life… Like us, animals can feel pain and fear, but also excitement and satisfaction” (Cothran 29). Animals feel much more pain that what we think and have a life that they should be allowed to live without the intrusion of humans. Animal experimentation, one of the many injustices we still have, should be a thing of the…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Facts

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If we are testing on animals because they are unlike us then why are we testing them for unreliable results? Animals do not deserve to be burned, trapped, locked in tiny cages, suffocated, and taken away from their natural habitat just for another false results that ends up killing a human just trying to get better. All animals are here on this earth to live and love their own life, to be free and to be in their natural surroundings, not to be in laboratories being testing on like a piece of…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many cosmetic factories use non-human entities as testing subjects for their products. Places such as Britain and France have made it illegal to use animals as testing subjects. Animal testing is an extremely divided subject with both ends having strong views. Many people see humans as superior to animals, so individuals conclude that it is acceptable to perform tests on animals. On the contrary, people see animal testing as cruel and inhumane because the animals are forcefully tested on with no form of consent.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    76-77. It does not cover fish and birds. It would seem clear that some type of rules and boundaries regarding how animals are used in testing becomes evident given the horrible examples of testing done on humans in the past which was abusive of them and which resulted in results of no benefit, usually being done for inhumane purposes. There are laws regarding how, for example, psychological testing done on humans. Animals do not have the ability to give permission for testing they would be better off without.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal Testing Methods

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Human bodies are can become much more affected by different chemicals that may be in these products, so testing them on animals is completely illogical because scientist may never truly see the effect that those products may have on humans. Testing on animals is an ineffective way to test products because it yields unreliable results. The scientist can never fully get a proper understanding on the effects of these products by testing them on animals. The animal’s body can not show…

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays