How Does Rhetorical Devices Used In Mark Antony's Speech

Improved Essays
In act three, scene two of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare Mark Antony addresses the plebeians and they want to know why Caesar is killed. Antony 's response to Caesar’s death is critical and he grieves over his death. He could not believe that his own friends had killed Caesar. After finding out about his death, Antony gives a speech the funeral. Antony goes along with the conspiracy so that he would not be killed as Caesar was. Brutus gives a speech to the people to explain his excuse for murdering Caesar. He uses logic to convince them it was the right action to take. People use their minds to think things over and make decisions, but sometimes emotions get the best of a person. In the opening section of Antony’s speech he gets the …show more content…
Antony uses rhetorical devices and conveys to the plebeian’s emotions to get them thinking and on his side. Antony changes the people of Rome view of Caesar being a tyrant to a hero and big-hearted ruler, who was accused of wrongdoing. Through the use of repetition of key words in contexts that reverse their meaning, through phrasing that suggests that Brutus is wrong and through theatrical gestures, Mark Antony sways the crowd to his position.
Antony cleverly repeats key words, using them to suggest the opposite of their actual meanings. The words “honorable” and “noble” initially show approval of Brutus, but result in his condemnation. Antony mentions the will and says he has said too much and he “I fear I wrong the honorable men, Whose daggers have stabbed Caesar. I do fear it.” If Brutus is honorable than why is Antony afraid. He repeats “honorable” to accentuate Brutus’s honorability and make the people of Rome question it. He points out Brutus kills Caesar. He gets Brutus’s permission to speak at the funeral, “For Brutus is an honorable man; So are they all, all honorable men”. Every time he uses “honorable”, he describes an honorable trait of Caesar that contradicts Brutus accusation. Also if he
…show more content…
Antony uses rhetorical questions that imply a negative answer. Antony lists Caesars’s virtues, then says "Did this in Caesar seems ambitious?". He questions them to lead the people of Rome to believe not it. By listing all the righteous deeds Caesar does, he builds credibility for Caesar. That credibility disproves Brutus’s statements about Caesar. Caesar was offered the crown 3 times, “Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?”. Caesar rejects the power that comes with the crown, so there is no way he was or wanted to be a tyrant. Everyone loved Caesar before, “What cause withholds you then, to mourn for him?”. No one has reasons to not feel bad for him. He has helped the poor and did not want the power, which was given to him. He has not done harm to anyone, this invalidates claims made about Caesar. He uses conjunctions that signal the opposite meaning. He says he is not here to disprove Brutus “But here I am to speak what I do know.” All the people only know what Brutus told them, but Antony knows the whole truth. Therefore, Brutus is lying or hiding a truth. He is not an eloquent public speaker “But, as you know me all, a plain blunt man”. He is not here to persuade the people against Brutus and he is a normal person just like the rest of them, but in reality, he is better than him and trying to get the people against Brutus. He does not want to be the cause of mutiny, “But here’s a parchment with the seal of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever noticed the differences between two speeches by listening to how each persuades the audience with their words? In the tragedy Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar gets stabbed in the back by the conspirators and dies. After his death, both Brutus and Antony give a speech to the people of Rome, expressing their logic and emotion behind Caesar’s assassination. Antony’s use of logical and emotional appeals swayed the Romans and proved his speech more effective than Brutus’s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to avenge Caesar, Mark Antony turns a shocked, confused crowd of mourners into an angry mob of rioters by using persuasive techniques. The main component of Antony’s speech, Pathos, appealed to the commoners by striking an emotional spot inside them, trying to turn the fickle crowd against Brutus. Antony displayed the persuasive technique of Pathos by repeating words, showing them Caesar’s body, and presenting Caesar’s will.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Shakespeare is regarded as the greatest writer in the English language. He is well-known for many of his works such as Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, etc. Along with these works is “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”. In “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, Shakespeare writes two very well known speeches that are delivered by the characters Brutus and Mark Antony during the funeral of Julius Caesar. In speeches, Shakespeare uses ethos, pathos and logos on behalf of Mark Antony and Brutus to persuade the citizens of their own beliefs.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowing he had to sway the crowd to believe his opinion, Antony had to discreetly show the crowd that conspirators were not heroes, but murderers. Using different forms of persuasion, Antony was able to achieve his goal of turing the sympathy to people now had for Brutus, over the Caesar once again. In order to persuade the people to not have sympathy for the Conspirators, Antony showed them Caesar’s will, repetitively said the word “honorable”, and showed them Caesar’s…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Every time Antony cleverly pauses in his speech to let the plebeians comment, the plebeians are more spiteful toward the conspirators. As the crowd begins to favour Antony the citizens make comments like "Methinks there is much reason in his saying" which shows there change in opinion.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony had the herculean task of turning the Roman population against Brutus and the other conspirators. To do this, Antony needed to follow up Brutus ' powerful oration with a short, supervised speech. Still, in little time Antony had turned the tides and had the Plebeians on his side. He had used certain devices in his speech, several of which include equalization, repetition, emotion, humility, irony, inflation, and anticipation, to aid in his success. Antony 's strategies worked like a charm, and even before his funeral oration had finished he and the conspirators all knew who had the upper hand. These seven devices were the keys to Marc Antony 's success.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The historical play, “Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare illustrates the problems of leadership that commence after the assassination of the Roman dictator, Julius Caesar. The play has a thorough use of rhetorical devices and was a powerful persuasion tool during the whole of the show. This literary device is extensively used during the funeral scene in Act three, Scene two where Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony give their speeches about Caesar's death. In their funeral speeches, while Marcus Brutus delivered a logical speech, Mark Antony overall wins the crowd through his use of ethics and empathy.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony uses several rhetorical devices when trying to persuade the people of Rome, such as anaphora, logos, pathos, and rhetorical questions. The crowd is impressed when Antony shows them that he has “a parchment with the seal of Caesar”(III.ii.130.). The mob becomes depressed when they hear Caesars will. Antony knew that by showing the will, the people the mob would see him as a hero for reading it as they grieve his death.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately, some individuals affirm Marc Antony’s employment of ethos and pathos as brainwashing his audience to follow his will without personal thought. These individuals, however, overlook the idea that Marc Antony surfaces the people’s own thoughts on the morality of the assassination. For example, Antony commences his eulogy by addressing the audience and asking them to “lend [him their] ears; / [He comes] to bury Caesar, not to praise him” (III. ii. 73-74). Antony states his direct purpose and asks for his audience’s attention outright, thus creating mutual respect through ethos by addressing his peers as equals. In addition, Antony appeals to the crowd’s emotions by mentioning Caesar’s will and how every citizen lies within in lines 132 and 133 of scene 2 in Act III. This employment of pathos riles up the audience and influences them to join his side, yet it also creates a leash with which Antony ties to the crowd to fulfill his agenda. Continuing, Antony leaves nothing to chance or opinion by focusing on the fact that he has no business in disproving Brutus’ words, but only to speak what he knows (III. ii. 100-101). Antony manipulates ethos in this instance to protect his integrity by addressing that his goal does not lie within feuding with another.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine losing a best friend and never saying goodbye.Imagine witnessing their last breath as they are brutally murdered. Imagine having to stand in front of a crowd trying to reason their death. In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy Julius Caesar, Mark Antony has to fill these dreadful shoes after witnessing the murder of his closest friend, Julius Caesar. In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to John Morley, “Three things matter in a speech - who says it, how he says it, and what he says, and of the three, the latter matters the least.” John understancds that how the speaker presents himself and his ideas can change the side of the crowd, more than any word they could have said. When Brutus and Antony give their funeral speeches in Julius Caesar it is a critical moment for each. Both need to sway the crowd to agree with their perspective. While Brutus addresses the crowd with logic and reason, Antony uses emotion. The use of rhetorical questions, parallel structure, and repetition by Brutus and Antony throughout their speeches changes the views of the crowd and what they should believe.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play “Julius Caesar” explained two men named Brutus and Antony who both presented speeches in front of their town with different meanings about the assassination of Caesar. Antony had to ask Brutus for permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. His despairing emotion and speech drawed the crowds special attention. Antony speech does not show any praise of caesar but does show sympathy and memorable memories that caesar did for his town. This whole situation sums a complete catastrophe. If Caesar was still living he would not allow the citizens of his village have freedom and be enslaved. Antony’s speech was more effective because it gave a positive meaning to the citizens. He begin to express his emotions about Caesar and his thoughts…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony was a very persuasive and intelligent man. As Rome 's people were seeking for answers, Mark saw this as a perfect opportunity to gain leverage and trust with the people. Mark Antony knew his audience very well, and appealed to the emotions (pathos) of the former soldiers of Caesar. He advertised the very skeptical assassination to promote doubt and sorrow, and received to get a rise out of the crowd in reaction. His goal was to create a mob mentality, and he succeeded in this because of his speech. He turned the Romans against the conspirators, resulting in a rebellion. This led Mark to gain the general appeal, and therefore overall power and authority. To achieve this, he presented the audience stab wounds in Caesar’s body, and manipulated the emotions of the people to benefit only himself in the end. This is a very ironic goal, given the reasoning for the assassination of Caesar (tyranny). To conclude, Mark was a master of persuasive speaking, and applied his full effort into his speech. Because of this, he reaped the benefits available, and gained the trust of the majority of Rome 's…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony: A True Hero

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Notwithstanding the greatness of his loyalty, Mark Antony displays many other indications of being a hero, an example of such being his favor in the eyes of the Roman people. The people of Rome chose to side with Antony over Brutus, when each character gave their funeral speeches after the death of Caesar. Brutus gave to the people his reasoning for killing Caesar, yet Antony only praised his deceased friend and never once tried to directly disprove the conspirator’s word. As Antony’s speech goes on his listeners fondness for him noticeably grows, the plebeians words show this well. The character of Third Plebeian says, even before the speech comes to an end, “There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony.” Not long after these words are spoken…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Act III Scene II, Marc Antony presents his famous speech that begins with “Friends, Romans, Countrymen, I come to bury Caesar not to praise him”, this speech was able to change the minds of the audience to turn against the conspirators. The purpose of Antony's speech was to show tribute to his friend Caesar in a eulogy and to revolt the audience. Antony wanted the audience to revolt for him to seek revenge on Caesar’s brutal murder. The purpose contributed to the significance of the speech in the play. The speech was crucially significant because in Brutus’s speech, it is claimed that the reason Caesar was killed was for the best interest…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays