How Does Rhetorical Devices Used In Mark Antony's Speech

Good Essays
In act three, scene two of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare Mark Antony addresses the plebeians and they want to know why Caesar is killed. Antony 's response to Caesar’s death is critical and he grieves over his death. He could not believe that his own friends had killed Caesar. After finding out about his death, Antony gives a speech the funeral. Antony goes along with the conspiracy so that he would not be killed as Caesar was. Brutus gives a speech to the people to explain his excuse for murdering Caesar. He uses logic to convince them it was the right action to take. People use their minds to think things over and make decisions, but sometimes emotions get the best of a person. In the opening section of Antony’s speech he gets the …show more content…
Antony uses rhetorical devices and conveys to the plebeian’s emotions to get them thinking and on his side. Antony changes the people of Rome view of Caesar being a tyrant to a hero and big-hearted ruler, who was accused of wrongdoing. Through the use of repetition of key words in contexts that reverse their meaning, through phrasing that suggests that Brutus is wrong and through theatrical gestures, Mark Antony sways the crowd to his position.
Antony cleverly repeats key words, using them to suggest the opposite of their actual meanings. The words “honorable” and “noble” initially show approval of Brutus, but result in his condemnation. Antony mentions the will and says he has said too much and he “I fear I wrong the honorable men, Whose daggers have stabbed Caesar. I do fear it.” If Brutus is honorable than why is Antony afraid. He repeats “honorable” to accentuate Brutus’s honorability and make the people of Rome question it. He points out Brutus kills Caesar. He gets Brutus’s permission to speak at the funeral, “For Brutus is an honorable man; So are they all, all honorable men”. Every time he uses “honorable”, he describes an honorable trait of Caesar that contradicts Brutus accusation. Also if he
…show more content…
Antony uses rhetorical questions that imply a negative answer. Antony lists Caesars’s virtues, then says "Did this in Caesar seems ambitious?". He questions them to lead the people of Rome to believe not it. By listing all the righteous deeds Caesar does, he builds credibility for Caesar. That credibility disproves Brutus’s statements about Caesar. Caesar was offered the crown 3 times, “Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?”. Caesar rejects the power that comes with the crown, so there is no way he was or wanted to be a tyrant. Everyone loved Caesar before, “What cause withholds you then, to mourn for him?”. No one has reasons to not feel bad for him. He has helped the poor and did not want the power, which was given to him. He has not done harm to anyone, this invalidates claims made about Caesar. He uses conjunctions that signal the opposite meaning. He says he is not here to disprove Brutus “But here I am to speak what I do know.” All the people only know what Brutus told them, but Antony knows the whole truth. Therefore, Brutus is lying or hiding a truth. He is not an eloquent public speaker “But, as you know me all, a plain blunt man”. He is not here to persuade the people against Brutus and he is a normal person just like the rest of them, but in reality, he is better than him and trying to get the people against Brutus. He does not want to be the cause of mutiny, “But here’s a parchment with the seal of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Do grace to Caesar’s corpse, and grace his speech…”(III,ii,50-52). Here Brutus is convincing the people to listen to Antony talk about Caesar for his funeral. This is a costly mistake because Brutus just convinced the crowd that his actions were justified and that he killed Caesar for the greater good. The people now dislike Caesar and are…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Antony states “Was this ambition? / Yet Brutus says [Caesar] was ambitious, /And, sure, he is an honorable man” but he lets the people of Rome ponder the evidence that the noble Brutus is wrong (JC.3.2.96-98). Through the repetition of “…Brutus is an honorable man,” Shakespeare juxtaposes the true actions of Brutus (JC.3.2.93). Antony brings attention to the unethical assassination by focusing on Brutus’s apparent “honorable[ness]”. This rhetorical device forces the Romans to consider Brutus’s character and leads to them understanding the hypocrisy of his decision to kill his best friend.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He said, “The noble Brutus/ Hath told you Caesar was ambitious;/ If it were so, it was a grievous fault,/ And grievous hath Caesar answer’d it.” (III.ii.75-78). In Antony’s speech, he tries to manipulate the publics’ opinion on the situation that took place and ultimately got the public to rise. He made Caesar look like the tragic hero. Antony put doubt into the publics’ minds telling them that, “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious;/ And Brutus is an honorable man.” (III.ii.91-92). Brutus was correct when he said that Caesar’s largest flaw was his ambition, but Antony was able to argue against that and make the public think that it Brutus was wrong.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The use of foreshadowing in this phrase gives adds suspense into the story, as many began to feel hinted about the coming events in the story. By saying this Brutus claims that he won’t be the same leader as Caesar and that the people of Rome mean more to him than his own life. This is an emotional approach in order to convince the plebeians to believe that assassinating Caesar was a good thing. Another approach Brutus took to appeal to plebeians’ emotions was when he said, “There is tears for his love; joy for his fortune; honour for his valour; and death for his ambition,” (III. ii.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Knowing he had to sway the crowd to believe his opinion, Antony had to discreetly show the crowd that conspirators were not heroes, but murderers. Using different forms of persuasion, Antony was able to achieve his goal of turing the sympathy to people now had for Brutus, over the Caesar once again. In order to persuade the people to not have sympathy for the Conspirators, Antony showed them Caesar’s will, repetitively said the word “honorable”, and showed them Caesar’s…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    You know not what you do: do not consent That Antony speak in his funeral: Know you how much the people may be moved By that which he will utter?” (Act III, Scene 1). Cassius can tell that Antony will betray them but Brutus does not believe it. Unlike Cassius who can see the vindictive and selfish intentions of people, Brutus sees the best in everyone less he has solid evidence. Cassius is a foil to Brutus. Both Cassius and Brutus plot to assassinate Caesar but Cassius is more inclined to treachery than Brutus is and thus easily concedes into his evil ambition.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “...Age, thou art shamed! Rome, thou hast lost the breed of noble bloods! ...O, you and I have heard our fathers say, There was a Brutus once that would have brooked Th’ eternal devil to keep his state in Rome As easily as a king” (I,ii,150-161). Continuing through that a tragic hero must have a tragic flaw. Marcus Brutus has the tragic flaw of having poor judgment, because he so easily trusts people, such as the conspirators consequently causing Marcus to be ignorant and blind to the fact that they were planning to kill Caesar, not to better the government but for personal gain.…

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Brutus gives his antithesis to claim his innocence and reasoning for the murder of Caesar by saying, “not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more,” Julius Caesar (3.2. 21-22). Brutus presents this antithesis to draw an ethical and emotional response from the crowd because of the contrast between loving Caesar less and loving Rome more. The strength of this is that it creates a parallelism of words that are a juxtaposition of each other. It causes the plebeians to see and emphasize the distinctions of the ideas that they might of looked over.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marcus Brutus’ ancestry is shown when the play states “There was a Brutus once that would have brooked Th’ eternal devil keep his state in Rome as easily as a king” (I.ii.159-161). Next Brutus suffers from a catastrophe which takes part in making him a tragic hero. The catastrophe Brutus suffers from is when he realizes that the other conspirators did not kill Caesar for the right reasons and that such an honorable person put himself with such bad people. Brutus was great friends with Caesar and he loved him but Brutus felt that he was compelled to kill him because that was what was going to be the best for Rome and its government. For example Brutus states “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” (III.ii.21-22).…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare creates the central idea that Brutus is a man with honor but his honor leads to tragedy. Marcus Brutus is torn between the two sides of being noble, but standing idly by and watching or being dishonorable in killing Caesar, but for the right reasons. This internal struggle then leads to his demise. First and most important, Shakespeare sets Brutus up to be the tragic hero. Throughout the play Shakespeare comes back to an idea again and again.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays