Gonzalez Vs. Raich Case Analysis

According to the Gonzalez vs. Raich case, this case was one that brought upon numerous questions to the citizens in California. While both of the parties had distinctive arguments, there was always one question that many individuals had, regarding who would eventually prevail? There were debates discussing interstate commerce and whether the use of medical marijuana was a part of this debate as it was grown in the state of California, but could this event affect other states? Did Congress truly have the power to regulate medical marijuana, as it was not explicitly written out in the Constitution? Well, after truly interpreting the case and understanding the facts, I do feel that I would have ruled the case to be in the hands of the states. The case that was presented before the Supreme Court concerning the use of medical marijuana was a rather odd, but very justifiable case. In 1996, the citizens of California voted that they would prefer to have medical marijuana as they saw that the use of this drug was more beneficial rather than harmful. Taking a look at the Declaration of Independence, you see one of the famous clauses, “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” and what …show more content…
I do feel that the main issue is that Congress did not feel that they have total control as they would like to. The United States is one nation and we should all be working together and allowing the states to have control would mean that lower government would feel like they have more of a say so in their state rather than just being a face. In the future if this situation came up for any other issues like civil rights, environment, or economic conduct then this would be depending upon the situation. As long as no state infringes against a person’s unalienable rights, then the states should have say