Nullification The Rightful Remedy Summary

Improved Essays
The United States of America was founded on the basis of liberty and freedom. Our founders believed it was an essential and important aspect of our country. They also believed it was the job of the federal government to ensure this freedom to its citizens; as explained in the constitution. To prevent national government from gaining too much power over the states, the idea of nullification was created. Nullification is an act made by a state or states to prevent a United States law. The documentary Nullification: The Rightful Remedy attempts to explain the history of nullification and how people today are implementing the concept to take some powers away from the federal government that they did not rightly have to begin with. The movie gives …show more content…
I do agree that the constitution was founded on the belief that states have freedoms by nature, and that the purpose of a federal government system is to maintain that freedom for its citizens. Also, that the federal system should not take any power not given to them in the constitution. In saying that, I also agree that there are cases in which the federal government has its citizens in its best interest when it makes decisions. The movie made the federal government seem to be completely “wrong” in every case. It also gave off a sense that this was a blanket issue; or that the federal government is always wrong or bad, and the states are always right. The founders of our country also wrote the constitution with intention of maintaining peace among the country. I believe that there are some issues so conflicting for people, that if states had final say in the issue, it would disrupt peace between states. Issues such as same sex marriage are permitted in some stated and not permitted in others. Complications and confusions come from this division among states. Because of this, I simply thing the federal government should step in and make a decision affecting every state as a whole. So for this reason, I do not agree that the federal system always needs to be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After many of the great forefathers declared their independence from Great Britain, we fought a long and messy war. After this war was over, America was a finally a free country, except instead of it being a tightly knit country, it was a discombobulated collection of states acting almost like countries by themselves. The main reason for this was that the Articles of Confederation were currently governing our country, and due to the many shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation, it left the nation weak. The Articles of Confederation did not force tax collection, and they also did not allow the government to raise an army.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life in early America was a period of experimentation. With the Revolution over, colonies began drafting their state constitutions, and America worked on the Articles of Confederation. This new country was eager to construct a smooth- running government, but the poorly constructed document only led to problems. Due to a lack of national powers, which ultimately led to an uprising and other difficulties, it was only a matter of time before the United States would need to make corrections to the government. This “Critical Period” eventually proved that America needed to repair their government and create a brand-new constitution.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress decided their current form of government, the Articles of Confederation, had many flaws. It was too weak to stop things such as Shay’s Rebellion. Because of this they organized a convention, many state representatives showed up, but some did not because they were pleased with how it was and didn’t want to change this. The people who were against changing the Articles of Confederation are called Anti-Federalists, and people that were for this are called Federalists. As a Federalist I believe the people of the United States should ratify the Constitution because we would fall to pieces without it.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    nullification allowed the states to nullify or reject any law they felt that was a violation to the constitution. Nullification was mainly pointed towards South Carolina because of their refusal to honor the…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Framers

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Presentation For Speech On December 10th: Made By: Brooke Heyl, Lalitha Aiyar, Maliyah Terry, and Eleanor Brodine In spite of the fact that, at the time, the formation of our government was seen as a grand experiment, all great experiments begin with background research and a purpose. In the case of the formation of the United States, the Framers researched other forms of government and different philosophies of the past. Of course, this was prompted by a series of attempts to seize the colonies by Great Britain - most of which violated the colonists’ promised rights of Englishmen.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New-State Creation Process The process in which to create and form a new state in the United States of America was forged to prevent new states would being put into place randomly and without the United States government’s consent. Many states have been created obviously in the American history, and these states also had to go through a process also to come into existence. After the creation of a state, there are clearly laws that must be followed by the population of people living within the state. These laws do in fact, come from the United States government and the constitution created by our founding fathers.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the Philadelphia Convention, the federalist constitution was opposed by some representatives of the state because they felt it limited the power of the states. They believed that it gave too much power to the central government. Some arguments that were made for in favor of the federalist constitution was that a central government would better protect the rights of the American people. The Supremacy clause stated “that the national government's authority prevails over any conflicting state or local government’s claims” (Morone & Kersh 118) was self evident in proving the fact that the central government, although permitting states reserved powers, would have more power than the states. The changes from Dual Federalism to New Federalism…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Now to protect such right, it would be in the best interest to ratify this new Constitution. The Constitution makes it so that the people have a real say in what happens with the government. With a unified government, a citizen in New York would be able to give their opinion on what happens in other states. This would be done with the correct separation of power, being the three branches, an executive, a judiciary, and a legislative [this one being separated into two]. With this separation of powers, every citizen has the capacity to be represented and voice their concerns to their representatives, thus protecting their agency and solving some issues not addressed by the Articles of Confederation, in this specific case, being the lack of courts and not being able to enforce…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nullification Crisis and the Hartford Convention: Voicing Diplomatic Frustration The Nullification Crisis and the Hartford Convention both brought up the problems in two different styles of life. The Nullification Crisis involved South Carolina trying to nullify the Tariff of Abominations. The Hartford Convention involved the New England Federalist Party, who met to discuss grievances against the decisions made by the federal government during the war of 1812. These different groups and events were two examples of ways that the common people fought the federal government overstepping their boundaries. Nullification is the action of which a state nullifies or invalidates a federal law because they see it as unconstitutional.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ: Ideals of the Declaration “I believe in the equality of man; and I believe that religious duties consist in doing justice, loving mercy, and endeavoring to make our fellow-creatures happy.” -Thomas Paine…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Describe some of the principles behind the Constitution. Discuss how the separation of powers and checks and balances are supposed to operate. How did the Constitution arrange the power relationships between the national government and the states? There are several principles behind the United States constitution, such as popular sovereignty, limited government, separation of power, checks and balances, and federalism.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The History of the Constitutional Convention In 1787, Congress realized that states governing themselves would leave the nation powerless when faced with another war. The United States had adopted the Articles of Confederation a decade prior, but the system wasn’t working. Each state was able to govern itself, and they didn’t have to abide by any regulations set by the federal government. The United States has a federalist government, meaning that the citizens are held to the laws of the state and the nation, but the federal government was left nearly powerless to enforce any type of authority. Congress had no way of being able to regulate commerce and no authority to emplace taxes.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many years ago our founding fathers made a government without tyranny, they were smart to do this because they didn't want to have all the power in the hands of one person or group. Delegates (55) gathered in Philadelphia at the Constitutional Convention to frame a government without too much power in the hands of one person or a group. The Constitution was signed September 17, 1787. How did these framers protect us from tyranny ? They wanted to create a government without tyranny and they did by creating federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the small state big state compromise.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Natural Rights The Enlightenment was a time period between 1650 and 1800 in Europe where people began to use logic rather than rely on the church or a king. People began to question religious beliefs and become more tolerant of new ideas. Philosophes such as Baron de Montesquieu, John Locke, Cesare Beccaria and many more introduce revolutionary new ideals that still affect our society today. Natural rights influenced the people and led them to revolution.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays