Gerrymandering Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
If you care about your say or the people’s say when voting for your country’s leaders, then you should know that gerrymandering is an unfavorable and atrocious way that many politicians have attempted to deceive the voting system. Gerrymandering violates the US Constitution that our founding fathers worked so hard to create. It is a very inequitable thing to undertake. Therefore, I am 100% against the idea of gerrymandering as it gives many parties an unjustified dominance in many states when voting electorally, and is important as it completely ignores people’s votes. Additionally, this issue also violates the United State citizens’ individual rights, and infringes on two of the seven constitutional principles. Gerrymandering is a type of strategy that some politicians use to manipulate the count in state votes by using districts to make one party have an advantage over the opposing party. For example, when the United States, counts the votes made by people electorally, each state is broken up into districts based on their population. The number of …show more content…
However, gerrymandering does not make the election more competitive because if there are more states where party A rules in the legislature, even if there are more votes for party B, party A will still become the victor. Gerrymandering also makes elections unfair and inaccurate. This is true because according to billmoyers.com, when the government gerrymanders, the outcomes don’t match the votes, the politicians are choosing instead of the people, and gerrymandering also causes more extremism. Because of all these effects of gerrymandering, it shows how unfair gerrymandering is seeing as the majority vote can be counted unfairly and cause the election to become more heated and extreme instead of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gerrymandering Case Study

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The purpose of proportional representation is to eliminate wasted votes and give representation to political parties in proportion to the votes they receive. This will essentially remove the issue of unfair representation that originates from partisan gerrymandering. They key to eliminating partisan gerrymandering from Texas elections is to adopt the large multimember districts used in PR…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Partisan Gerrymandering is the process legislators go to though, by either drawing or changing district boundaries, to make sure one political party has an advantage when it comes to the outcome of an election. This takes away the whole point of being a democratic country where people have the freedom to choose their own government, and representation. Because elections are rigged and peoples votes don't count, legislators makeup district boundaries that only benefit them, and most importantly keep a party chosen by them and only them in a secure route to WIN, without caring about what the voters actually want. Making partisan gerrymandering a big threat to democracy because instead of having the people choose, politicians are choosing for them. Since legislators draw the district…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think that gerrymandering isn’t a beneficial tactic for representing the people of a country, because it takes control away from what the people want. Instead of having citizens control what party is in control, the current political party is able assure that they can stay in power. Also, previously I strongly believed in a non partisan group doing the redistricting because it would eliminate the ability for parties to keep control of an area, but even with a non partisan group, the side that happened to lose out would accuse the non partisan group of actually being partisan. With that said, redistricting without a political affiliation would be the best way, even though the redistricting could be left to chance more than political decisions. I also think that Racial Gerrymandering is a beneficial form of gerrymandering.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Week article “How to rig elections, the legal way”, The week staff describes how parties gain an advantage by redrawing voting districts. This process of redrawing voting districts to favor one’s political party is considered gerrymandering. It creates districts that are irregularly shaped and is a legal process unless it violates the 1965 voting rights act which makes it illegal to redistrict based off of minority voters. Gerrymandering has been successful in recent years because in 2012 gerrymandered states such as Pennsylvania won 49% of the vote and took 72% of house seats. Redistricting is overseen by whoever controls the state legislature and happens every ten years with data collected from the recent census.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This may occur to to the addition or loss of representative(s). Each district has to have equal population, must be connected, and must be compact. Politicians may gerrymander to keep an incumbent in power. They change district lines to ensure that the majority of voters in the district will support the incumbent.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States reapportionment and redistricting are both processes for deciding voting lines. Reapportionment is the process of reassessing the amount of congressional house seats for each state. Reapportionment is conducted through a census. This takes place every ten years, during which every person, citizen or not, is counted in each state. The process also decides the amount of votes each state gets for the electoral College.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is important to states because they can be able to become more important if they receive more representatives. Define congressional redistricting. Congressional redistricting is when a state has more representatives rather than districts so they redraw the border. Explain two goals of politicians when they gerrymander during redistricting.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Wisconsin gerrymander of 2011-12 is another example of a time when gerrymandering was carried a little too far. The ratio of Republican to Democrat representatives in the State Assembly was dramatically increased. For anyone siding with the Republicans, this could be considered a victory. Considering the situation from the angle of an impartial citizen, neither party “wins,” because individuals are gradually losing their influence in American politics. Objectively, one can see that gerrymandering is no better than an extremely overlooked form of legal voting…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prison Gerrymandering

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case “Davidson v. City of Cranston” the City of Cranston, Rhode Island counted inmates as part of the total population when conceiting district lines, causing prison gerrymandering. The first district found that the City of Cranston had not violated the Equal Protection Clause. In a sense, prison gerrymandering legal under Evenwel v. Abbott. Prison Gerrymandering is “the practice of counting incarcerated people as residents of prisons when drawing electoral districts” (Davidson v. City). This case has many contradictions to the rule of law including multiple factors.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a well functioning republic, voters elect officials whose ideals align with their own. To allow politicians with a vested interest in the way districts are drawn create congressional districts is inherently illogical, and, as the court cases in Wisconsin and our state have shown, politicians of both parties will act on this vested interest. Disproportionate representation is a result of gerrymandering when redistricting is placed in the hands of state legislatures, but it is not the only result. Packing districts also decreases political competition. The consequence of the lack of competition is increasing polarity in office.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College Dilemma Premise: The U.S. Electoral College voting system needs to be improved upon because whoever earns the majority of total votes cast should be the winner. Definitions: Electoral College-…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, there is no legislation against redistricting. The most significant point the author made was the pressing issue of racial redistricting in Texas. Gerrymandering is the redistribution in which electoral district boundaries are drawn for electoral advantage. Gerrymandering is often used to hinder political parties, racial groups, or class groups.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Creating districts that are more likely to have “shared legislative ends” also assumes that the goal of redistricting is making Congress work more smoothly. If the goal of redistricting is instead making Congress more demographically representative of the American citizenry, geographical compactness does not directly contribute to that goal. In addition, geographical compactness is not a neutral way to create districts. Ignoring other factors (like race) that affect what representative people might choose does not make those factors nonexistent; by drawing districts that are meant to “neutral,” but specifically “race-neutral,” the districts end up favoring white voters (Amy 2009). Not taking factors like race into account does not make district-drawing practices less biased, it simply makes the biases of redistricting less obvious.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Electoral College By constitution, US has a unique system of electing President and Vice President. Every four years elections are being held. On the Election Day voters do not choose President directly choose electors who will represent their will, hence voters indirectly choose a President and Vice President. Electoral College consists of 538 electors.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law involving gerrymandering was passed in 1967 that banned multimember districts for fear of racism or an unfair advantage to one party (Yglesias). The argument for gerrymandering is that it balances the seats in Congress, half Republican and half Democrat, providing the minority more of a majority in congress. It also provides politicians the ability to safely guarantee the majority in the House does not change because of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays