Gerrymandering: The Destruction Of Democracy

Improved Essays
What a shame that, in a country founded on and by democracy, such an undemocratic practice as gerrymandering is allowed to work almost unchecked in politics! How is it that America prides herself on giving an equal voice to each of her citizens, yet she allows politicians to create grotesque new voting districts in order to favor their party? Although the practice of gerrymandering has been used by politicians almost since the foundation of the country, it is rarely brought to the attention of most people. Gerrymandering is gradually destroying democracy in America by drowning the voices of the citizens and by removing the competitive energy and fairness from elections.
The state census is taken only once every decade. At that time, it is understandable
…show more content…
In the races, Republicans won half a million more votes than the Democrats. The Democratic Party won 31 more seats.” The facts that Reagan is relating in his quote seem to clearly prove that gerrymandering makes an extreme difference in election results. If those voting districts had been evenly and impartially divided, it is likely that the Republican party would have won the greater number of seats. At the very least, the number of seats for both parties would have been more evenly distributed according to the voters. The Wisconsin gerrymander of 2011-12 is another example of a time when gerrymandering was carried a little too far. The ratio of Republican to Democrat representatives in the State Assembly was dramatically increased. For anyone siding with the Republicans, this could be considered a victory. Considering the situation from the angle of an impartial citizen, neither party “wins,” because individuals are gradually losing their influence in American politics. Objectively, one can see that gerrymandering is no better than an extremely overlooked form of legal voting …show more content…
In an interview on gerrymandering, Lance Kelley noted that it is a case of “out of sight, out of mind” (“Kelley”). People seem to forget that gerrymandering is a problem until they are outraged by the unfairness of it. Unfortunately, at that point the districts have been drawn and confirmed, and it is generally too late to change them. After a gerrymander has been finalized, it is difficult to change it prior to the next redistricting. Occasionally lawsuits have been filed against excessive gerrymanders, stating that they are unconstitutional. Although there is foundation for such an accusation, very few of the lawsuits actually have a great enough effect to cause the districts to be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Baker V. Carr Case Study

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Q1 The main inquiry in Baker v. Carr was in the case of redistricting was a legitimate issue the courts could deliver proactively to revise manhandle or a political issue. The state contended that it was a political issue, so the courts had no purview. The case demonstrated a standout amongst the most debilitating in the Supreme Court's history, with the choice held over for re-contention on the grounds that the court couldn't achieve a lion's share choice. Equity Charles Evans Whittaker was so resentful about the case, he at long last recused himself from the choice, and the worry over the choice may have added to his initial retirement from the Court.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Partisan Gerrymandering is the process legislators go to though, by either drawing or changing district boundaries, to make sure one political party has an advantage when it comes to the outcome of an election. This takes away the whole point of being a democratic country where people have the freedom to choose their own government, and representation. Because elections are rigged and peoples votes don't count, legislators makeup district boundaries that only benefit them, and most importantly keep a party chosen by them and only them in a secure route to WIN, without caring about what the voters actually want. Making partisan gerrymandering a big threat to democracy because instead of having the people choose, politicians are choosing for them. Since legislators draw the district…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the next census coming up in 2020, the United States will have to analyze areas where that population has either increased or decreased and redistribute the electoral districts accordingly. Unfortunately, this will result in some form of gerrymandering to sway voting populations for either Democrats or Republicans. After the 2016 elections, it seems as those redistricting had be in favor of the Republicans so they can reclaim areas that they…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter two of Why the Electoral College is Bad for America George C. Edwards III discusses how political equality is hindered by the existence of the electoral college. Edwards very eloquently argues that the electoral college is a threat to American democracy. The author uses statistics from past elections to support his claim that the electoral college leads to political inequality. Edwards first defines why political equality is so crucial to democracy. Then he goes on to state how the popular votes have translated into the electoral votes.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What Is Gerrymandering?

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Pages

    definition is to divide the constituencies of (a voting area) so as to give one party an unfair advantage or to manipulate or adapt to one’s advantage. Gerrymandering is the process of drawing congressional districts in a way that favors one political party or interest group. The term 'gerrymandering' goes back to the 19th century. In 1812, the Boston Gazette coined the word in reaction to Massachusetts's governor Elbridge Gerry's redistricting of the Boston region. This new district was awkwardly drawn to benefit his political party and happened to look like a salamander on the map.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prison Gerrymandering

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case “Davidson v. City of Cranston” the City of Cranston, Rhode Island counted inmates as part of the total population when conceiting district lines, causing prison gerrymandering. The first district found that the City of Cranston had not violated the Equal Protection Clause. In a sense, prison gerrymandering legal under Evenwel v. Abbott. Prison Gerrymandering is “the practice of counting incarcerated people as residents of prisons when drawing electoral districts” (Davidson v. City). This case has many contradictions to the rule of law including multiple factors.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every ten years, the government takes a constitutionally required census, or counting of population, to assess the growth in certain areas as well as population shifts. Once the population is recorded, the federal redistricting process begins and it is determined how many seats each state should receive in the House of Representatives. If there are any population shifts in the state, that is where redistricting comes into play as well as gerrymandering. According to Professor Justin Levitt’s website on redistricting, “in most states, the state legislature has primary control over the redistricting process, both for state legislative districts and for congressional districts.”…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Creating districts that are more likely to have “shared legislative ends” also assumes that the goal of redistricting is making Congress work more smoothly. If the goal of redistricting is instead making Congress more demographically representative of the American citizenry, geographical compactness does not directly contribute to that goal. In addition, geographical compactness is not a neutral way to create districts. Ignoring other factors (like race) that affect what representative people might choose does not make those factors nonexistent; by drawing districts that are meant to “neutral,” but specifically “race-neutral,” the districts end up favoring white voters (Amy 2009). Not taking factors like race into account does not make district-drawing practices less biased, it simply makes the biases of redistricting less obvious.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gerrymandering is very essential in our society because it entitles equal representation of seats that represents each district. Gerrymandering is a method that filters seats in the House of Representatives, no state will have too many seats and nor too little representation depending on the census, which is conducted every ten years. Gerrymandering is a method that filters out the too little representation or too much representation for each state district. This term brings a balance of representation to not just the districts, but to the House of Representatives. It is important that each state district has equal representation because one state can dominate another when it comes to passing, voting, or creating new laws.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Democracy Pros And Cons

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The concern with this practice is because it distorts congressional elections by reordering electoral districts to favor a certain party over the other. This political procedure manipulates district boundaries to sort voters with similar political beliefs or social ties into a single district or sorts them into two districts to give power to the current majority. Gerrymandering is an undemocratic procedure because the election outcomes often times do not represent the public’s votes. The method is convenient for those who want their party to stay in control of the office.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When using the proportional voting system to elect the president the same winner, Barack Obama, was chosen, however with this new method the race was significantly closer. Using the current method used to elect President Obama, he won with three hundred and thirty two electoral votes to Mick Romney’s two hundred and six electoral votes. When the new method was used, the proportional system, Obama still won, however he did not win with as big of a gap as he did using the current method. With the proportional system, Obama collected two hundred and sixty nine votes to Romney’s two hundred and fifty eight votes, a much closer race. Using the proportional system not only makes the presidential race closer, but more accurate in depicting how America…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Voting rights and eligibility laws should be protected, based on actual research on impact on all voters and risks to fraud and corruption, and not determined by states. Too many reputable studies have been done proving that some states design everything from eligibility to physical and logistical opportunity to vote as a political weapon to deny citizens the right to political influence that the college - and all that the US stands for - theoretically depends and insists on to function as intended. We are already seeing large impact from this, and it won't get better in the coming years. Drawing of congressional districts should be by independent bipartisan commission and based on unbiased population algorithms - not by the party in power.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law involving gerrymandering was passed in 1967 that banned multimember districts for fear of racism or an unfair advantage to one party (Yglesias). The argument for gerrymandering is that it balances the seats in Congress, half Republican and half Democrat, providing the minority more of a majority in congress. It also provides politicians the ability to safely guarantee the majority in the House does not change because of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fair Voting Research Paper

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While some may argue that it is a result of voters not being active or engaged enough to elect officials representatives. Even if that were to change, it alone, would not be enough to change much. This winner take all methodology is “central reason for major problems with our politics: gerrymandering, partisan gridlock...distortions in fair representation have roots in the winner take all method”. The U.S is in critical need of fair representation and it is one of the very pressing issues American democracy faces…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The major reason why the millennial’s are not voting in local elections is, because they are uneducated in the proper way to vote. Dr. Brian Cannon (2016) provided a lecture on Gerry-manderring and the effects of it in the Virginia elections. Gerry-manderring is when a political figure running for office changes the voting lines in of the districts in their state for their benefit. Political Gerry-manderring is legal in the United States as long as it used for political reasons, if it is used racially it is considered illegal. In the lecture we were given examples in which political and racial Gerry-manderring is looked liked much the same thing.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays