Gerrymandering Argumentative Essay

Improved Essays
Politicians are manipulating your votes. In our republic, the views of the people are supposed to be represented through the officials they elect. However, in many states, including our own, this idea of a republic is under attack. Our state legislature is being tried on accounts of illegal partisan gerrymandering. The Democrat led legislature drew districts with the goal of maintaining their party’s power in the state legislature. The result of this gerrymandering was an overrepresented Democratic party, inaccurately reflecting the views of our state’s citizens. It’s important to acknowledge that our court’s ruling on this issue has larger implications in the battle against gerrymandering as a whole. Gill v. Whitford 16 U.S. 1161 (2017-18) is another recent case that illustrates why gerrymandering is such a pressing question in our republic. The Republican state legislature in Wisconsin created unfair districts to ensure their majority in 2011. This redistricting resulted in the Wisconsin Republicans obtaining over sixty percent of …show more content…
In a well functioning republic, voters elect officials whose ideals align with their own. To allow politicians with a vested interest in the way districts are drawn create congressional districts is inherently illogical, and, as the court cases in Wisconsin and our state have shown, politicians of both parties will act on this vested interest. Disproportionate representation is a result of gerrymandering when redistricting is placed in the hands of state legislatures, but it is not the only result. Packing districts also decreases political competition. The consequence of the lack of competition is increasing polarity in office. With packed districts, candidates do not need to appeal to members of both parties to win office, so they are able to take their views to an extreme in order to appeal to the more extreme members of their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gerrymandering Case Study

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are many solutions to this issue, but the most effective and instantaneously acting one would be to take the power of redrawing district lines entirely out of the hands of the legislature and let an independent nonpartisan commission take over the job (Prokop, 2015). This method would work very well and almost entirely rid Texas of gerrymandering. Other states actually use a similar method to this called ostensible redistricting commissions, but the problem with this is that the politicians appoint the members of the commission. In result, the commissions are not actually independent, and the legislature still holds some control over the situation, essentially making this method ineffective in eliminating partisan gerrymandering. Fortunately, there are several other ways to eliminate gerrymandering, such as the abandonment of the single member plurality system and replacing it with proportional representation.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gerrymandering is the act of redrawing district lines, after a census, in a way that favors a specific political party. It is a perfectly legal practice that is used by both parties in hopes of influencing the party that controls Congress, and subordinate state and local governments. Two common strategies of gerrymandering are packing and cracking. Packing occurs when a district is drawn so that voters of a specific party are included into a single district, in order to limit the influence of that specific party. Cracking occurs when a district is drawn so that voters of a specific party are spread out between several districts in order to limit their influence in a specific district.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Partisan Gerrymandering is the process legislators go to though, by either drawing or changing district boundaries, to make sure one political party has an advantage when it comes to the outcome of an election. This takes away the whole point of being a democratic country where people have the freedom to choose their own government, and representation. Because elections are rigged and peoples votes don't count, legislators makeup district boundaries that only benefit them, and most importantly keep a party chosen by them and only them in a secure route to WIN, without caring about what the voters actually want. Making partisan gerrymandering a big threat to democracy because instead of having the people choose, politicians are choosing for them. Since legislators draw the district…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Week article “How to rig elections, the legal way”, The week staff describes how parties gain an advantage by redrawing voting districts. This process of redrawing voting districts to favor one’s political party is considered gerrymandering. It creates districts that are irregularly shaped and is a legal process unless it violates the 1965 voting rights act which makes it illegal to redistrict based off of minority voters. Gerrymandering has been successful in recent years because in 2012 gerrymandered states such as Pennsylvania won 49% of the vote and took 72% of house seats. Redistricting is overseen by whoever controls the state legislature and happens every ten years with data collected from the recent census.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the next census coming up in 2020, the United States will have to analyze areas where that population has either increased or decreased and redistribute the electoral districts accordingly. Unfortunately, this will result in some form of gerrymandering to sway voting populations for either Democrats or Republicans. After the 2016 elections, it seems as those redistricting had be in favor of the Republicans so they can reclaim areas that they…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, gerrymandering does not make the election more competitive because if there are more states where party A rules in the legislature, even if there are more votes for party B, party A will still become the victor. Gerrymandering also makes elections unfair and inaccurate. This is true because according to billmoyers.com, when the government gerrymanders, the outcomes don’t match the votes, the politicians are choosing instead of the people, and gerrymandering also causes more extremism. Because of all these effects of gerrymandering, it shows how unfair gerrymandering is seeing as the majority vote can be counted unfairly and cause the election to become more heated and extreme instead of…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the pursuit of power, politicians will lie, cheat, and cross lines to get what they want. In some cases they will even draw the lines, literally. A process called Gerrymandering, in which state legislatures draw up congressional districts, is incredibly partisan. It includes drawn boundaries based on race, ethnicity, and political affiliation. With the purpose of maximizing a group or political parties votes or diluting the other group or parties vote.…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This may occur to to the addition or loss of representative(s). Each district has to have equal population, must be connected, and must be compact. Politicians may gerrymander to keep an incumbent in power. They change district lines to ensure that the majority of voters in the district will support the incumbent.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What Is Gerrymandering?

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Pages

    definition is to divide the constituencies of (a voting area) so as to give one party an unfair advantage or to manipulate or adapt to one’s advantage. Gerrymandering is the process of drawing congressional districts in a way that favors one political party or interest group. The term 'gerrymandering' goes back to the 19th century. In 1812, the Boston Gazette coined the word in reaction to Massachusetts's governor Elbridge Gerry's redistricting of the Boston region. This new district was awkwardly drawn to benefit his political party and happened to look like a salamander on the map.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What a shame that, in a country founded on and by democracy, such an undemocratic practice as gerrymandering is allowed to work almost unchecked in politics! How is it that America prides herself on giving an equal voice to each of her citizens, yet she allows politicians to create grotesque new voting districts in order to favor their party? Although the practice of gerrymandering has been used by politicians almost since the foundation of the country, it is rarely brought to the attention of most people. Gerrymandering is gradually destroying democracy in America by drowning the voices of the citizens and by removing the competitive energy and fairness from elections.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prison Gerrymandering

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case “Davidson v. City of Cranston” the City of Cranston, Rhode Island counted inmates as part of the total population when conceiting district lines, causing prison gerrymandering. The first district found that the City of Cranston had not violated the Equal Protection Clause. In a sense, prison gerrymandering legal under Evenwel v. Abbott. Prison Gerrymandering is “the practice of counting incarcerated people as residents of prisons when drawing electoral districts” (Davidson v. City). This case has many contradictions to the rule of law including multiple factors.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, redistricting and gerrymandering are used to promote political parties such as the growing dominates Republican Party. The elections are now more based on unfair gerrymandering, interest group funding, and campaigning rather than the politician. Therefore, the voting right act, unfair campaigns, and gerrymandering can dilute minority voters and their voice in…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this sense, proponents argue that the process “somehow preserves federalism or small states ' legitimate interests” (Edwards 2005, p. 11). One concern of the democratic process is developing methods for maintaining equal representation across all states despite their size. Imbalances due to the weight given to states, the potential for the winner to lose the popular vote, and disproportionate advantages are all cited as major failures of the Electoral College in adhering to democratic principles. Proponents for direct elections cite these implications as a source of criticism of the current system. The national attention on those states that have the variability for political competition can cause an imbalance in issues that candidates consider (Grofman & Feld, 2009).…

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College was a system outlined in the United States’ constitution by the founding fathers, as the method in which they believe the president should be elected. But with the progression of time the views on the necessity of the Electoral College has become a controversy, as now two factions exist with one faction believing that the Electoral College is an illegitimate method for the election of a president. Though this faction exists and believes the Electoral College is an unfair system that gives a disproportionate voice to different United States’ citizens, but is it truly unfair and unjust. As the Electoral College is a part of the United States constitution where it can be found in Article II, Section I along with a few clarifications…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law involving gerrymandering was passed in 1967 that banned multimember districts for fear of racism or an unfair advantage to one party (Yglesias). The argument for gerrymandering is that it balances the seats in Congress, half Republican and half Democrat, providing the minority more of a majority in congress. It also provides politicians the ability to safely guarantee the majority in the House does not change because of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays