Gerrymandering Argumentative Essay

Improved Essays
Politicians are manipulating your votes. In our republic, the views of the people are supposed to be represented through the officials they elect. However, in many states, including our own, this idea of a republic is under attack. Our state legislature is being tried on accounts of illegal partisan gerrymandering. The Democrat led legislature drew districts with the goal of maintaining their party’s power in the state legislature. The result of this gerrymandering was an overrepresented Democratic party, inaccurately reflecting the views of our state’s citizens. It’s important to acknowledge that our court’s ruling on this issue has larger implications in the battle against gerrymandering as a whole. Gill v. Whitford 16 U.S. 1161 (2017-18) is another recent case that illustrates why gerrymandering is such a pressing question in our republic. The Republican state legislature in Wisconsin created unfair districts to ensure their majority in 2011. This redistricting resulted in the Wisconsin Republicans obtaining over sixty percent of …show more content…
In a well functioning republic, voters elect officials whose ideals align with their own. To allow politicians with a vested interest in the way districts are drawn create congressional districts is inherently illogical, and, as the court cases in Wisconsin and our state have shown, politicians of both parties will act on this vested interest. Disproportionate representation is a result of gerrymandering when redistricting is placed in the hands of state legislatures, but it is not the only result. Packing districts also decreases political competition. The consequence of the lack of competition is increasing polarity in office. With packed districts, candidates do not need to appeal to members of both parties to win office, so they are able to take their views to an extreme in order to appeal to the more extreme members of their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gerrymandering Case Study

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Most people believe that the outcome of elections in Texas is decided by the voters, but in our current single-member district system of electing representatives, frequently that is not the case. Often times who will win in an election is decided long before election day, usually by those who draw the district lines. For example, if the districts in texas are drawn to be 65 percent republican then the outcome will most likely result in republicans that have the majority of seats in the legislature. In a single member district system, only one member can be elected to congress for each district, that is why drawing the district lines is by far one of the most important aspects for a party to win seats. The parties assure their representatives…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People don't get a choice about who they want representing them as a country, which is the whole opposite of what being a democratic country means. Their voting for a reason and should be able to have a say in what's going on in the government. But sometimes when politicians are drawing these borders their not always looking out for the people and sometimes only care about their own political interest. For example, if they're more on the Republican side then their more lenient to drawing the district borders in a way that will benefit the Republican party. Which doesn't respect the wishes and desires of the voters, and allowing this to happen is not what democracy is about.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parties in charge of redistricting will attempt to pack opposing voters into very few districts. In cracking, however, opposing voters are spread out among several…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gerrymandering is the process of altering electoral districts to favor a political party over the other by receiving more votes in that district based on the population demographics and party affiliation. The practice of gerrymandering was created when Governor Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts had enacted a bill that would allow the state to the redistricted in a way that would favor the party he represented, the Democratic-Republican Party, over the Federalists. When the redistricting plan was brought to the press, the term was created using Governor Gerry 's name and the term salamander after one district in Boston appeared to look like a salamander. In recent elections, the United States has not gone through a redistricting process since the last census in 2010.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, gerrymandering does not make the election more competitive because if there are more states where party A rules in the legislature, even if there are more votes for party B, party A will still become the victor. Gerrymandering also makes elections unfair and inaccurate. This is true because according to billmoyers.com, when the government gerrymanders, the outcomes don’t match the votes, the politicians are choosing instead of the people, and gerrymandering also causes more extremism. Because of all these effects of gerrymandering, it shows how unfair gerrymandering is seeing as the majority vote can be counted unfairly and cause the election to become more heated and extreme instead of…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Reporter Ronald Brownstein argues that there are four quadrants of Congress. Brownstein adheres to the idea that demographic factors that go beyond region play a powerful role in shaping each party’s representation in the House. The four quadrants of Congress, which include districts that have high levels of racial minorities and of educated whites, districts with high minority levels and low levels of white education, districts that have low minority levels and high white education levels, and districts with low minority levels and low white education, shape the impact of demography on parties in the House. The Democrats’ two greatest demographic strengths are the racial minorities and well-educated whites. While the Democrats drawing their…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This may occur to to the addition or loss of representative(s). Each district has to have equal population, must be connected, and must be compact. Politicians may gerrymander to keep an incumbent in power. They change district lines to ensure that the majority of voters in the district will support the incumbent.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One limit is that you should be able to draw the line of the district without having to pick up your pencil. It’s a continuous line. The second limit is that the amount of people in a district should be equal. Political parties play important roles in US elections and government institutions. Over the past several decades, the influence of political parties in elections has declined while their strength in Congress has increased.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the races, Republicans won half a million more votes than the Democrats. The Democratic Party won 31 more seats.” The facts that Reagan is relating in his quote seem to clearly prove that gerrymandering makes an extreme difference in election results. If those voting districts had been evenly and impartially divided, it is likely that the Republican party would have won the greater number of seats. At the very least, the number of seats for both parties would have been more evenly distributed according to the voters.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prison Gerrymandering

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case “Davidson v. City of Cranston” the City of Cranston, Rhode Island counted inmates as part of the total population when conceiting district lines, causing prison gerrymandering. The first district found that the City of Cranston had not violated the Equal Protection Clause. In a sense, prison gerrymandering legal under Evenwel v. Abbott. Prison Gerrymandering is “the practice of counting incarcerated people as residents of prisons when drawing electoral districts” (Davidson v. City). This case has many contradictions to the rule of law including multiple factors.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, redistricting and gerrymandering are used to promote political parties such as the growing dominates Republican Party. The elections are now more based on unfair gerrymandering, interest group funding, and campaigning rather than the politician. Therefore, the voting right act, unfair campaigns, and gerrymandering can dilute minority voters and their voice in…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this sense, proponents argue that the process “somehow preserves federalism or small states ' legitimate interests” (Edwards 2005, p. 11). One concern of the democratic process is developing methods for maintaining equal representation across all states despite their size. Imbalances due to the weight given to states, the potential for the winner to lose the popular vote, and disproportionate advantages are all cited as major failures of the Electoral College in adhering to democratic principles. Proponents for direct elections cite these implications as a source of criticism of the current system. The national attention on those states that have the variability for political competition can cause an imbalance in issues that candidates consider (Grofman & Feld, 2009).…

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College was a system outlined in the United States’ constitution by the founding fathers, as the method in which they believe the president should be elected. But with the progression of time the views on the necessity of the Electoral College has become a controversy, as now two factions exist with one faction believing that the Electoral College is an illegitimate method for the election of a president. Though this faction exists and believes the Electoral College is an unfair system that gives a disproportionate voice to different United States’ citizens, but is it truly unfair and unjust. As the Electoral College is a part of the United States constitution where it can be found in Article II, Section I along with a few clarifications…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Creating districts that are more likely to have “shared legislative ends” also assumes that the goal of redistricting is making Congress work more smoothly. If the goal of redistricting is instead making Congress more demographically representative of the American citizenry, geographical compactness does not directly contribute to that goal. In addition, geographical compactness is not a neutral way to create districts. Ignoring other factors (like race) that affect what representative people might choose does not make those factors nonexistent; by drawing districts that are meant to “neutral,” but specifically “race-neutral,” the districts end up favoring white voters (Amy 2009). Not taking factors like race into account does not make district-drawing practices less biased, it simply makes the biases of redistricting less obvious.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law involving gerrymandering was passed in 1967 that banned multimember districts for fear of racism or an unfair advantage to one party (Yglesias). The argument for gerrymandering is that it balances the seats in Congress, half Republican and half Democrat, providing the minority more of a majority in congress. It also provides politicians the ability to safely guarantee the majority in the House does not change because of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays