Partisan Gerrymanding Pros And Cons

Decent Essays
Partisan Gerrymandering is the process legislators go to though, by either drawing or changing district boundaries, to make sure one political party has an advantage when it comes to the outcome of an election. This takes away the whole point of being a democratic country where people have the freedom to choose their own government, and representation. Because elections are rigged and peoples votes don't count, legislators makeup district boundaries that only benefit them, and most importantly keep a party chosen by them and only them in a secure route to WIN, without caring about what the voters actually want. Making partisan gerrymandering a big threat to democracy because instead of having the people choose, politicians are choosing for them. Since legislators draw the district …show more content…
People don't get a choice about who they want representing them as a country, which is the whole opposite of what being a democratic country means. Their voting for a reason and should be able to have a say in what's going on in the government. But sometimes when politicians are drawing these borders their not always looking out for the people and sometimes only care about their own political interest. For example, if they're more on the Republican side then their more lenient to drawing the district borders in a way that will benefit the Republican party. Which doesn't respect the wishes and desires of the voters, and allowing this to happen is not what democracy is about. They shouldn't pick a side because it will benefit them and should let the votes do the speaking instead of them. Because isn't democracy all about having the people have a choice and say in its government? But not only does partisan gerrymandering affect the people's votes, it also affects who gets the win at the end of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gerrymandering Case Study

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Most people believe that the outcome of elections in Texas is decided by the voters, but in our current single-member district system of electing representatives, frequently that is not the case. Often times who will win in an election is decided long before election day, usually by those who draw the district lines. For example, if the districts in texas are drawn to be 65 percent republican then the outcome will most likely result in republicans that have the majority of seats in the legislature. In a single member district system, only one member can be elected to congress for each district, that is why drawing the district lines is by far one of the most important aspects for a party to win seats. The parties assure their representatives…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Week article “How to rig elections, the legal way”, The week staff describes how parties gain an advantage by redrawing voting districts. This process of redrawing voting districts to favor one’s political party is considered gerrymandering. It creates districts that are irregularly shaped and is a legal process unless it violates the 1965 voting rights act which makes it illegal to redistrict based off of minority voters. Gerrymandering has been successful in recent years because in 2012 gerrymandered states such as Pennsylvania won 49% of the vote and took 72% of house seats. Redistricting is overseen by whoever controls the state legislature and happens every ten years with data collected from the recent census.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many times by voting a third party, these citizens end up voting in a candidate farther from their views than their second choice (Bugh,…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is important to states because they can be able to become more important if they receive more representatives. Define congressional redistricting. Congressional redistricting is when a state has more representatives rather than districts so they redraw the border. Explain two goals of politicians when they gerrymander during redistricting.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Benefits of Congressional Term Limits According to Lydia Saad three in four Americans would vote for Congress members to have limits on the amount of terms they can serve. noteDespite the information previously stated citizens of the United States have still neglected to put the concept of Congressional term limits at the federal level into effect, perhaps they have not yet realized the specific benefits that limits on terms in Congress would have on American politics. The issue of Congressional term limits is not rearing its head for the first time. In the 1990’s several states passed legislation to limit the terms of their state Congressmen.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What a shame that, in a country founded on and by democracy, such an undemocratic practice as gerrymandering is allowed to work almost unchecked in politics! How is it that America prides herself on giving an equal voice to each of her citizens, yet she allows politicians to create grotesque new voting districts in order to favor their party? Although the practice of gerrymandering has been used by politicians almost since the foundation of the country, it is rarely brought to the attention of most people. Gerrymandering is gradually destroying democracy in America by drowning the voices of the citizens and by removing the competitive energy and fairness from elections.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each individual vote should be counted towards whomever the voter believes is right to run their…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a well functioning republic, voters elect officials whose ideals align with their own. To allow politicians with a vested interest in the way districts are drawn create congressional districts is inherently illogical, and, as the court cases in Wisconsin and our state have shown, politicians of both parties will act on this vested interest. Disproportionate representation is a result of gerrymandering when redistricting is placed in the hands of state legislatures, but it is not the only result. Packing districts also decreases political competition. The consequence of the lack of competition is increasing polarity in office.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College Dilemma Premise: The U.S. Electoral College voting system needs to be improved upon because whoever earns the majority of total votes cast should be the winner. Definitions: Electoral College-…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, redistricting and gerrymandering are used to promote political parties such as the growing dominates Republican Party. The elections are now more based on unfair gerrymandering, interest group funding, and campaigning rather than the politician. Therefore, the voting right act, unfair campaigns, and gerrymandering can dilute minority voters and their voice in…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College is an integral part of the current election process of the United States. Created during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the Founding Fathers developed the establishment of Electors through debate of the Virginia Plan which proposed that Congress should elect the President. However, concerns of the President being controlled by Congress and fears over a small group of individuals being able to dictate who would hold office, presented the need to change the plan. The Committee of Eleven created the Electoral College in an attempt to proportionately divide state votes among delegates in the same numbers as their representatives in Congress, and the adoption of the Electoral College was “met with widespread approval…

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When states need to redraw districts after every census, it is often up to state legislatures to figure out the lines. Within limits, the state legislatures can draw the districts however they see fit. The basic requirements from the federal government are equal populations in each congressional district, and compliance with the 1982 Voting Rights Amendment. The Voting Right Amendment prohibited both discriminatory intents and effects when drawing district lines, and allowed for the creation of majority-minority districts as a method of remedying discriminatory effects. Most other considerations – such as a desire to make districts geographically compact – are based on state laws.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law involving gerrymandering was passed in 1967 that banned multimember districts for fear of racism or an unfair advantage to one party (Yglesias). The argument for gerrymandering is that it balances the seats in Congress, half Republican and half Democrat, providing the minority more of a majority in congress. It also provides politicians the ability to safely guarantee the majority in the House does not change because of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Third Parties is a necessary part of the political system. Without third parties there would be very little diversity and ability to change political group. In addition, some optimal solutions may be covered up. Finally, it also decreases citizen involvement because people are less likely to affiliate with one of only two parties. Third parties are an essential part of the american political system, in order to come to an optimal solution in farthing the progress of the country.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fair Voting Research Paper

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While some may argue that it is a result of voters not being active or engaged enough to elect officials representatives. Even if that were to change, it alone, would not be enough to change much. This winner take all methodology is “central reason for major problems with our politics: gerrymandering, partisan gridlock...distortions in fair representation have roots in the winner take all method”. The U.S is in critical need of fair representation and it is one of the very pressing issues American democracy faces…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays