Gerrymandering: Redrawing Voting Ways

Improved Essays
In The Week article “How to rig elections, the legal way”, The week staff describes how parties gain an advantage by redrawing voting districts. This process of redrawing voting districts to favor one’s political party is considered gerrymandering. It creates districts that are irregularly shaped and is a legal process unless it violates the 1965 voting rights act which makes it illegal to redistrict based off of minority voters. Gerrymandering has been successful in recent years because in 2012 gerrymandered states such as Pennsylvania won 49% of the vote and took 72% of house seats. Redistricting is overseen by whoever controls the state legislature and happens every ten years with data collected from the recent census. This process is hard to stop because the state legislature, in most cases, districts to favor their own political party. …show more content…
The process of gerrymandering started in 1788, before Congress even existed. Henry drew the fifth congressional district in Virginia to include as many Anti-Federalists as possible. However, Henry didn’t have the resources to prevent Madison, his opponent, from beating him. Today, Henry would have been able to ensure victory because of detailed census results and voter tallies. Political parties use two specific techniques to gerrymander which are “packing” and “cracking” districts. Parties in charge of redistricting will attempt to pack opposing voters into very few districts. In cracking, however, opposing voters are spread out among several

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gerrymandering Case Study

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are many solutions to this issue, but the most effective and instantaneously acting one would be to take the power of redrawing district lines entirely out of the hands of the legislature and let an independent nonpartisan commission take over the job (Prokop, 2015). This method would work very well and almost entirely rid Texas of gerrymandering. Other states actually use a similar method to this called ostensible redistricting commissions, but the problem with this is that the politicians appoint the members of the commission. In result, the commissions are not actually independent, and the legislature still holds some control over the situation, essentially making this method ineffective in eliminating partisan gerrymandering. Fortunately, there are several other ways to eliminate gerrymandering, such as the abandonment of the single member plurality system and replacing it with proportional representation.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gerrymandering is the act of redrawing district lines, after a census, in a way that favors a specific political party. It is a perfectly legal practice that is used by both parties in hopes of influencing the party that controls Congress, and subordinate state and local governments. Two common strategies of gerrymandering are packing and cracking. Packing occurs when a district is drawn so that voters of a specific party are included into a single district, in order to limit the influence of that specific party. Cracking occurs when a district is drawn so that voters of a specific party are spread out between several districts in order to limit their influence in a specific district.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People don't get a choice about who they want representing them as a country, which is the whole opposite of what being a democratic country means. Their voting for a reason and should be able to have a say in what's going on in the government. But sometimes when politicians are drawing these borders their not always looking out for the people and sometimes only care about their own political interest. For example, if they're more on the Republican side then their more lenient to drawing the district borders in a way that will benefit the Republican party. Which doesn't respect the wishes and desires of the voters, and allowing this to happen is not what democracy is about.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prior to playing the gerrymandering game, I knew that it was the manipulation of districts in order to gain a political advantage of some kind. It is possible to do this because the districts have to be redrawn based on updated census data, as population is always changing. I also knew that it is difficult for the opposing party to win an election when the controlling party gerrymandered the district to favor them. While playing the game, I learned that it is difficult to adjust the districts where every representative is satisfied. I also learned that if there were more strict laws about having very thin parts of the district, it would be more difficult to gerrymander.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Reporter Ronald Brownstein argues that there are four quadrants of Congress. Brownstein adheres to the idea that demographic factors that go beyond region play a powerful role in shaping each party’s representation in the House. The four quadrants of Congress, which include districts that have high levels of racial minorities and of educated whites, districts with high minority levels and low levels of white education, districts that have low minority levels and high white education levels, and districts with low minority levels and low white education, shape the impact of demography on parties in the House. The Democrats’ two greatest demographic strengths are the racial minorities and well-educated whites. While the Democrats drawing their…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This may occur to to the addition or loss of representative(s). Each district has to have equal population, must be connected, and must be compact. Politicians may gerrymander to keep an incumbent in power. They change district lines to ensure that the majority of voters in the district will support the incumbent.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congressional reapportionment and redistricting are conducted every ten years. When redistricting is conducted politicians often engage in gerrymandering. Define congressional reapportionment and explain one reason why it is important to states. Congressional reapportionment is when there is a change in the amount of seats in the House of Representatives after the United States Census, or decennial census.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States reapportionment and redistricting are both processes for deciding voting lines. Reapportionment is the process of reassessing the amount of congressional house seats for each state. Reapportionment is conducted through a census. This takes place every ten years, during which every person, citizen or not, is counted in each state. The process also decides the amount of votes each state gets for the electoral College.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Politicians are manipulating your votes. In our republic, the views of the people are supposed to be represented through the officials they elect. However, in many states, including our own, this idea of a republic is under attack. Our state legislature is being tried on accounts of illegal partisan gerrymandering. The Democrat led legislature drew districts with the goal of maintaining their party’s power in the state legislature.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prison Gerrymandering

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case “Davidson v. City of Cranston” the City of Cranston, Rhode Island counted inmates as part of the total population when conceiting district lines, causing prison gerrymandering. The first district found that the City of Cranston had not violated the Equal Protection Clause. In a sense, prison gerrymandering legal under Evenwel v. Abbott. Prison Gerrymandering is “the practice of counting incarcerated people as residents of prisons when drawing electoral districts” (Davidson v. City). This case has many contradictions to the rule of law including multiple factors.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College Dilemma Premise: The U.S. Electoral College voting system needs to be improved upon because whoever earns the majority of total votes cast should be the winner. Definitions: Electoral College-…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, redistricting and gerrymandering are used to promote political parties such as the growing dominates Republican Party. The elections are now more based on unfair gerrymandering, interest group funding, and campaigning rather than the politician. Therefore, the voting right act, unfair campaigns, and gerrymandering can dilute minority voters and their voice in…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this sense, proponents argue that the process “somehow preserves federalism or small states ' legitimate interests” (Edwards 2005, p. 11). One concern of the democratic process is developing methods for maintaining equal representation across all states despite their size. Imbalances due to the weight given to states, the potential for the winner to lose the popular vote, and disproportionate advantages are all cited as major failures of the Electoral College in adhering to democratic principles. Proponents for direct elections cite these implications as a source of criticism of the current system. The national attention on those states that have the variability for political competition can cause an imbalance in issues that candidates consider (Grofman & Feld, 2009).…

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By leveraging population size differences, the Electoral…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is called political polarization. Political polarization is the cause of recurrent stalemates, numerous fiscal budget crises, and a growing distrust in Congress and its ability to function. Polarization slows the lawmaking process, preventing new bills from reaching the floor and current ones…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays