Gerrymandering Case Study

Improved Essays
Most people believe that the outcome of elections in Texas is decided by the voters, but in our current single-member district system of electing representatives, frequently that is not the case. Often times who will win in an election is decided long before election day, usually by those who draw the district lines. For example, if the districts in texas are drawn to be 65 percent republican then the outcome will most likely result in republicans that have the majority of seats in the legislature. In a single member district system, only one member can be elected to congress for each district, that is why drawing the district lines is by far one of the most important aspects for a party to win seats. The parties assure their representatives …show more content…
There are many solutions to this issue, but the most effective and instantaneously acting one would be to take the power of redrawing district lines entirely out of the hands of the legislature and let an independent nonpartisan commission take over the job (Prokop, 2015). This method would work very well and almost entirely rid Texas of gerrymandering. Other states actually use a similar method to this called ostensible redistricting commissions, but the problem with this is that the politicians appoint the members of the commission. In result, the commissions are not actually independent, and the legislature still holds some control over the situation, essentially making this method ineffective in eliminating partisan gerrymandering. Fortunately, there are several other ways to eliminate gerrymandering, such as the abandonment of the single member plurality system and replacing it with proportional representation. The purpose of proportional representation is to eliminate wasted votes and give representation to political parties in proportion to the votes they receive. This will essentially remove the issue of unfair representation that originates from partisan gerrymandering. They key to eliminating partisan gerrymandering from Texas elections is to adopt the large multimember districts used in PR

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    During primary elections, party competition heightens over voter participation as it determines the direction of political change in Texas. Up until 1960, the Democratic Party controlled nearly all Texas elections. This is because, “when one political party tends to dominate [the selection of a public official], voters who wish to participate in choosing their local public officials must vote in that party’s primary” (197). But over the half past-century, many counties have shifted from the Democratic to the Republican primary.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judge Justice (along with the other judges) found that The Legislative Redistricting Board did not take redistricting seriously, but instead they did what they wanted. Another issue that was brought up in the case was the multimember districts in Dallas and Bexar. Representatives in these districts are elected but minorities seem to be underrepresented. The Legislative Redistricting Board had the lines drawn so there could be political success. The decision that was made brought controversy so this case was brought to the U.S. Supreme Court (White v. Regester) in which they agreed with the court’s decision.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People don't get a choice about who they want representing them as a country, which is the whole opposite of what being a democratic country means. Their voting for a reason and should be able to have a say in what's going on in the government. But sometimes when politicians are drawing these borders their not always looking out for the people and sometimes only care about their own political interest. For example, if they're more on the Republican side then their more lenient to drawing the district borders in a way that will benefit the Republican party. Which doesn't respect the wishes and desires of the voters, and allowing this to happen is not what democracy is about.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parties in charge of redistricting will attempt to pack opposing voters into very few districts. In cracking, however, opposing voters are spread out among several…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas political alignment began as a strong and faithful for the Democratic Party. Through time however the political alignment switched from Democratic, to Republican, to a long lasting Democratic until turning back into the Republican alignment we have today. The particular rime and the economy of Texas was a large part of what cause these changes. To dive deeper into the changes of political alignment we have to understand who was in power at the time both in the national government and state government. In this paper I will expand on the points of: how the Democratic Party was able to gain control of the state government in Texas well into the 1970s, how Texas shifted from being an overwhelmingly Democratic state to being an overwhelmingly…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Texas constitution gives very specific rules for how our congress must be organized. It is a bicameral congress, which…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Voters must return to the polls every two years to either ratify or reject many issues that most don’t even consider issues and register minimum if any statewide attention. Turnout is very low and the 50% rule in Texas is nonexistent, the percentage is actually between 8-10percent often even lower. This is primarily due again because it has to be done every two years and the issues are not statewide issues. The truth is the majority if not all of say Dallas voters are simply not interested in whether El Paso County can tax itself to create a parks district…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this system, they attempt to decrease the number of votes wasted by increasing the number of parties there are in the legislature. Since the proportional representation relies on more than one legislative seat in each district, it allows for the amount of votes wasted to decrease. In this system, the voters cast their ballot for a party and not a single candidate. The percentage of votes a party receives will determine how many of the districts seats the part will end up gaining. Another difference between the two systems is that proportional representation is based on multi- member districts, so it creates elections that are not centered on competition between individuals.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Texas Third Parties

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Elections and campaigns play a big part of the democratic system. Elections are conducted every two years and are held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of even-numbered years. States must elect members of Congress and vote for president on this date. Durning non-presidential years in Texas, general elections are held every two years to elect candidates to statewide offices such as governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general, land commissioner, agricultural commissioner, comptroller, and some members of the Texas Railroad Commission and the Texas State Board of Education. The Decision of which ballot form and method of casting ballots in given to each county in Texas and the secretary of state’s office must approve…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This may occur to to the addition or loss of representative(s). Each district has to have equal population, must be connected, and must be compact. Politicians may gerrymander to keep an incumbent in power. They change district lines to ensure that the majority of voters in the district will support the incumbent.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States reapportionment and redistricting are both processes for deciding voting lines. Reapportionment is the process of reassessing the amount of congressional house seats for each state. Reapportionment is conducted through a census. This takes place every ten years, during which every person, citizen or not, is counted in each state. The process also decides the amount of votes each state gets for the electoral College.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the races, Republicans won half a million more votes than the Democrats. The Democratic Party won 31 more seats.” The facts that Reagan is relating in his quote seem to clearly prove that gerrymandering makes an extreme difference in election results. If those voting districts had been evenly and impartially divided, it is likely that the Republican party would have won the greater number of seats. At the very least, the number of seats for both parties would have been more evenly distributed according to the voters.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main subject of the article is the controversy over the state’s redistricting plan and racial discrimination. Citizens and civil rights groups have started to challenge the discrimination in Texas elections. Texas is facing lawsuits over racial and political redistricting. The U.S. Supreme Court has also started to take action and implement laws to create change. The Voting Rights Act was created to prevent legal restrictions against minority redistricting.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law involving gerrymandering was passed in 1967 that banned multimember districts for fear of racism or an unfair advantage to one party (Yglesias). The argument for gerrymandering is that it balances the seats in Congress, half Republican and half Democrat, providing the minority more of a majority in congress. It also provides politicians the ability to safely guarantee the majority in the House does not change because of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Opportional Voting System

    • 2433 Words
    • 10 Pages

    An amendment to the Constitution requiring that seats in the House of Representatives be delegated by a party-list proportional representation system of elections, is necessary to enhance the democratic elements of the United States Government: particularly voter turnout, the creation of more political parties, and a more diverse electorate . Currently, the “Past the Post” style of elections in the United States has tainted the American democracy, and it is time that the country be required to move to a more democratic style of elections. With the passage of the newly proposed twenty seventh amendment, the House of Representatives could become, a more democratic and modern institution. Every two years in the United States, there are elections…

    • 2433 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays