Thompson, and Joseph V. Hickey, there are several arguments regarding the positives and the negatives of the RIP system that I agree and disagree with. The first point that I agree with is the RIP system doesn’t discriminate, and isn’t biased towards the patient, unlike some doctors. A counter- argument to this could be the fact that the RIP system, just like any other computer program can go bad, and essentially stop working. The second point is one that I disagree with and it is the fact that RIP system will be wrong in about five percent of all cases so we shouldn’t use it. Even though they very well may be wrong in about five percent of all cases, does using that same logic means that we shouldn’t use doctors anymore because they aren’t able to save everyone’s life? Of course not, buts that was the message that I received from that point. Everyone is going to have their own opinions, however it doesn’t change the amount of potential it has to be a dynamic asset in the medical
Thompson, and Joseph V. Hickey, there are several arguments regarding the positives and the negatives of the RIP system that I agree and disagree with. The first point that I agree with is the RIP system doesn’t discriminate, and isn’t biased towards the patient, unlike some doctors. A counter- argument to this could be the fact that the RIP system, just like any other computer program can go bad, and essentially stop working. The second point is one that I disagree with and it is the fact that RIP system will be wrong in about five percent of all cases so we shouldn’t use it. Even though they very well may be wrong in about five percent of all cases, does using that same logic means that we shouldn’t use doctors anymore because they aren’t able to save everyone’s life? Of course not, buts that was the message that I received from that point. Everyone is going to have their own opinions, however it doesn’t change the amount of potential it has to be a dynamic asset in the medical