Egalitarianism (as it is applied today) is actually simple: the belief that every group is the same. Why do you think they created all the censor words to disqualify anyone who doesn't hold this believe from speaking (racist, sexist, misogynist, homophobe, etc.)? They want this belief accepted without debate or discussion.
Why? because it allows them to confuse equal opportunity with equal outcome. If you say that equal opportunity doesn't lead to equal outcomes, then they can disqualify you from speaking (you are a sexist, racist, homophobic, Nazi, hater). And, thus it allows them to justify unequal treatment because unequal outcomes MUST be the result of either sexism or differences. Well, they already established (by censorship) that every …show more content…
You see women make difference choices because they are oppressed, and so we need to give them more help, more resources, more money, more incentives, and essentially lower standards for them (i.e. favorable/unequal treatment in women's favor) to push women into making the decisions that will get an equal outcome...thus overcoming "the oppression of women".
Egalitarianism is about hiding differences between groups so they can justify GIVING to groups that which those group cannot earn in fair competition. It is handicapping, plain and simple.
The irony of this handicapping system is that the narrative of "oppression" prevents the handicapping to become universal because it establishes fixed "victim groups". So, if women are doing better in school, we can't handicap the system to favor boys...because women are the oppressed victim group. Recognizing boys as being oppressed would cause the whole narrative to fall apart under examination of this handicap system. It only works if no one is allowed to question it. That is why victim groups lose their minds trying to disqualify (censor) anyone who questions egalitarianism (the belief that all groups are the same....thus any differences in outcome MUST be
Why? because it allows them to confuse equal opportunity with equal outcome. If you say that equal opportunity doesn't lead to equal outcomes, then they can disqualify you from speaking (you are a sexist, racist, homophobic, Nazi, hater). And, thus it allows them to justify unequal treatment because unequal outcomes MUST be the result of either sexism or differences. Well, they already established (by censorship) that every …show more content…
You see women make difference choices because they are oppressed, and so we need to give them more help, more resources, more money, more incentives, and essentially lower standards for them (i.e. favorable/unequal treatment in women's favor) to push women into making the decisions that will get an equal outcome...thus overcoming "the oppression of women".
Egalitarianism is about hiding differences between groups so they can justify GIVING to groups that which those group cannot earn in fair competition. It is handicapping, plain and simple.
The irony of this handicapping system is that the narrative of "oppression" prevents the handicapping to become universal because it establishes fixed "victim groups". So, if women are doing better in school, we can't handicap the system to favor boys...because women are the oppressed victim group. Recognizing boys as being oppressed would cause the whole narrative to fall apart under examination of this handicap system. It only works if no one is allowed to question it. That is why victim groups lose their minds trying to disqualify (censor) anyone who questions egalitarianism (the belief that all groups are the same....thus any differences in outcome MUST be