Jonathan Safran Foer Eating Animals Analysis

Improved Essays
The book Eating Animals is a journalistic book written by Jonathan Safran Foer. In the book Foer talks about good and bad consequences of eating animals in America. He talks about animal welfare in family vs. factory farms, animal diseases, slaughter and much more. Foer does not a directly attempt to convince the reader to become vegan, however his main idea does focus on many problems of the meat industry being solved by people becoming vegan. But is this solution realistic?

Foer himself is vegetarian, and in the book he shows a pro vegan attitude. Especially now with his newborn son, it is important for him to choose food carefully for both him and his family. Foer argues against factory farms, because of how they mistreat animals and how the environment get affected by the big “shit” dumping industry.

As he broke into a farm in the middle of the night, Foer could see dead chicks laying spread
…show more content…
Which once in awhile would overflow, “(...) it seeps into rivers, lakes and oceans -killing wildlife and polluting air, water and land(...)”(Foer 174). This is very relevant to Foer’s main argument because it is a very common and relevant theme discussed in both politics and daily-life conversation. Factory farms are polluting the environment, we only have one planet, one environment. This is why people might find this argument supportive to the main idea of becoming vegetarian.

All these arguments fall under the main argument, which is pro vegan. In other words, if one stops eating animals, one does not absorb the drugs and diseases. One does not support factory farms (by buying their products), which then makes a decrease in factory farming. Which then makes a decrease on environmental poisoning, and an increase animal welfare. But, this is not very likely to happen. Because people want to eat meat, and at the end of the day, people eat what they want to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Veganism Vs Vegetarianism

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A well known medical journal, WebMD, proves that purely vegetarian diets are harmful to all human bodies. As seen in the visual from Rightposters, humans were given dominion over the animals so that they could benefit mankind. The geniuses at Khan Academy can easily prove that animals were made to be eaten purely with science. That’s just how nature works. Nandi Argues that vegetarian diets are personally uneconomical, and ProCon argues that vegetarian diets actually can be harmful to the environment they are trying to protect.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On Eating Animals Analysis

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    While considering the ethical aspects of eating meat, I personally find myself imagining the human as part of a natural circle of life where animals kill and eat each other to survive. Genuine disgust at the cruelty has been evident in the response of donations to animal welfare groups. So it's not to say that farm animals get no sympathy in the United States, but only that Americans somehow don't recognize that cruelty is the norm, not the exception, and is incorporated into the very idea of factory farms; what makes meat cheap is the assembly line processing. Treating animals humanely begins with natural diets, open spaces for living, eliminating the use of hormones that manipulate body weight and mutilations, together with more in depth training for caretakers and inspectors, maybe surveillance cameras, and professionals who enforce laws and prosecute violators, and so on all of which would make meat more expensive. Nothing strikes me as more absurd than calling oneself an animal lover while consuming industrialized meat, though people will surely continue to lie to themselves and even offer various excuses to defend their habit.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout Eating Animals, Jonathan Foer illustrates all the different elements that go into the production of animal meat, showing different perspectives and emphasizing on the inhumane aspects. When consuming meats, people do not generally think about where that meat is coming from, but instead how good it tastes. They blind themselves from the diseases that meat could be carrying and the pain in which the animal probably endured, ignoring these facts for the sake of pleasure. Throughout a segment of Foer’s book, “Slices of Paradise/Pieces of Shit”, Foer provides his research on the different farming industries, the industries repercussions, and identifies the consumers of these products as those responsible to putting these inhumane ways…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So many people currently make their living off animal industries that it would be difficult to suddenly shift away from those products. The documentary was not thorough in explaining how to end animal agriculture altogether. There did not appear to be any proposals for making change, but they did at least successfully raise awareness for the harm in consuming meat. The argument against home farming was tenuous, as it predominantly appealed to emotion, showing the horror of killing an animal yourself rather than actually proving it is unsustainable. I think home farming could be a suitable alternative to large scale animal agriculture.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Why Is Veganism Wrong

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Going Vegan: The Wrong Decision People who avoid eating any and all animal products can have health related problems later in life. The origins of a meatless diet relates to religious and ethical beliefs such as kindness to animals (D’Amico 1). The meatless diet has existed for centuries, but now, it arises as more of a trend of people wanting others to become vegan as well as being kind to animals. The moral values have lasted since the diet’s origins, but the execution persists to cause error. The ones that make the change, from eating meat to not, have issues changing their diet and keeping it balanced.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As an alternative, there are people who eat both meat and vegetables. However, people who eat mostly vegetables and fruits are known as vegetarians. On the other hand, others prefer to eat meat and are considered as meat eaters. Some vegetarians won’t eat meat because they blame humans for killing animals in slaughter houses and extinguish them. On the other hand, meat eaters are against eating vegetables because they would not consider themselves as "rabbits".…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Name: Dwight Walters Date: 10/22/2017 Course: English Composition 1013-0011 Topic: Critique Against Meat Jonathan Safran Foer, a novelist gives us his thought to chew on with his opinion against meat where he brings out his experience and arguments in this article to sum up the effects meat have in today’s world, in health and also the general effects it have on the earth, have drastically crumbled making the world an inhabitable place. Which I totally agree with! Because we as human lack the understanding of how meat is produce and the general idea that follows behind of it. We often enjoy the love of eating meat and are blind to the horrible effects within the meat industry. Jonathan Safran Foer presents his main ideas…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You scream, I scream, we all scream for… VEGANISM! Okay, okay, no we don’t. Let me just start off by saying this is not another vegan advocacy. Trust me, there’s already one too many of those. I’m not here to convince you that not eating meat will somehow magically let you talk to animals or that if you do choose to eat meat you’ll be condemned to hell, although, some people are so ignorant and/or gullible they’d probably believe it.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Taking part in “Meatless Monday” means a little responding to the problems that our world has faced. 2) By “Polarizing” is meant that mostly the decision to eat or not to at factory farmed meat, the meat that comprises 99 % of the meat available in the US’s supermarkets nowadays refers to ethic, to morality and sequentially is a controversial one. By “personal” side of his assertion Jonathan Foer meant that each individual have the right to decide by his own, being aware of conditions, animal’s suffering and consequences, whether to consume factory farmed meat or not. It is personal choice that matters, if these choices are made steadily. I agree with the assertion of the author of “Eating animals”.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With all that comes the waste from the livestock. Vegans do not believe all this waste should be eliminated from livestock and this is why they choose to be vegan. All this manure is not only bad for the environment but it is also bad for the atmosphere. All the harmful products that are in the manure are now in the atmosphere. McKibben believes that raising to much cattle can cause the oversupply of atmosphere greenhouse gases into the ground for another half a century.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays