In the article “Flesh of Your Floods”, Foer neither has the authority or experience to write on the topic when most of early childhood and adult life choose not to consume meat, “During high school and college, he converted to vegetarianism several more times, partly to salve his conscience...” (Kolbert 3). If Foer is trying to convince, those who consume meat, to why they should consider dog for dinner is considered to be an opposing argument to his claim. In comparison to Foer demeaning and straight forward tone he seems to very persuasive to change the perception of what both meat lovers and vegetarians consume. Despite using any terms such as “we” or “us” until the very last two pages of the excerpt, Foer lets the reader take an insight on his own stubbornness views that may connect to the audiences when he says, “Can’t we get over our sentimentality?”…