Essay on Dred Scott Vs. John Supreme Court Case

1855 Words Apr 27th, 2016 null Page
March 6, 1875 a court verdict that will preside in infamy, the verdict of the Dred Scott versus John Sandford Supreme Court case. Dred Scott, a once enslaved African-American man who then moved with his wife to Illinois, a free state or one in which slavery is illegal. By virtue of not being allowed to purchase land undeterred by the fact that under state legislation he was a free man, Dred Scott attempted to sue in a federal court. The chief justice in this case was Chief Justice Roger B Taney, a Federalist white man. He was also born and raised in a slaveholding household, obviously one that was against the freedom of negroes in America. His bipartisan opinion on Dred Scott ensued Taney in ignoring crucial evidence brought before the court by the plaintiff. To further enumerate to Roger B Taney’s crime, his limits on his legislation as a judge was overused as a verdict emerged. In respect to the court case ruling of Dred Scott v John Sanford it is coherent that the verdict in favor of John Sanford was unjust and prejudiced, in view of the evidence of the Chief Justice being racist, not taking into account background information on both parties equally while being unbiased, and overusing his power as a judge. When describing Chief Justice Roger B Taney, one must first and foremost include his ethnicity which coincidentally one would find certain to be caucasian. At no fault of his own, he was brought up in a household that retained a tobacco plantation, one that relied on…

Related Documents