Pros And Cons Of The Lincoln-Douglas Debates

Improved Essays
The Lincoln-Douglas debates, also known as the Great Debates of 1858, were a series of seven debates between two politicians running for the senate seat of the state of Illinois. The politicians were the republican nominee, Abraham Lincoln, and the democratic nominee, incumbent Stephen Douglas. The debates covered a series of topics, the most pertinent being the issue of slavery and its expansion into the newer western territories. The idea of the debates came forth after both Lincoln and Douglass had given speeches opposing one another in two of Illinois’ congressional districts. Lincoln and Douglas agreed to the series of seven debates in the remaining congressional districts: Ottawa, Freeport, Jonesboro, Charleston, Galesburg, Quincy, and …show more content…
Due to this statement, Douglas, in the first debate held in Ottawa, attempted to portray Lincoln as an abolitionist saying that his party was a “Black Republican party, who are in favor of the citizenship of the Negro”. Lincoln disputed this however, stating that the black man “…is not my equal in many respects… But in the right to eat the bread without the leave of anybody else, which his own hand earns, he is my equal… and the equal of every living man”. He continued to say leading up to the final debate the city of Alton, that the declaration of independence “intended to include all men, but they did not mean to declare all men equal in all respects”. He further disputed Douglas’ claims that he was an abolitionist through his support of the fugitive slave act which returned escaped slaves in the north to their owners back south. Lincoln stated that the point of his debates was not to abolish slavery in the old southern states but to stop it from spreading to the newer territories acquired in the …show more content…
Sandford. Lincoln tried to force Douglas to choose between his principle of popular sovereignty proposed in his Kansas-Nebraska Act which created the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska and endowed the citizens the legislative power to decide, through popular sovereignty, whether or not they would allow slavery, and the decision reached by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case. The case surrounded an enslaved African American man that was suing for his freedom after being held captive within the boundaries of two free states. The issues before the court had been whether or not entering “free” territory made a slave free and whether this freedom granted blacks the ability to sue in federal court. The justices ruled that under the language of the constitution did not apply to blacks because within the context of when the constitution was written, slaves were seen solely as property and had no rights. This Decision of the justices as well as the Kansas-Nebraska Act voided the Missouri

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    history. The Dred Scott v. Sandford was probably the worst court decision ever decided by supreme court justices, as Dred Scott a former slave was taken to go live in Illinois (a free-state) for a year. Dred Scott along with his wife Harriet sued their owners for having slaves in a free-state and should be granted their freedom. This 11-year long struggle would soon surface into the Supreme Court, where by a majority margin, 7-2, Scott was sadly still a slave. In an attempt to end and solve the slavery problem once and for all, Supreme Court Justice Roger B. Taney quote "[Black people] Had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior that they had no rights which…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On May 30, 1854, Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas presented the Kansas-Nebraska Act that had a devastating impact on the Democratic Party and the stability of the Union. The bill aimed to organize the territory of Nebraska, which was the area North of Missouri where slavery was prohibited according to the terms of Missouri Compromise of 1820. The Westward expansion of the nation continually threatened the shaky balance of power between pro-slavery states and free states. Congress had to make bargains and propose comprises to avert crisis between the North and the South.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the election of 1860, the Republican Abraham Lincoln won the election. A surprising fact is that he did not get any votes from the south. He believed that slavery can’t be just stopped at once, but it should not be able to spread in the new territories. However, the southern misunderstand President Abraham Lincoln and considered him as a danger against the practice of slavery. Thus, the southern criticized the Abraham Lincoln’s…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by the U.S. Congress on May 30, 1854. It allowed people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for them whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. The Act served to repeal the Missouri Compromise of 1820 which prohibited slavery north…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the Kansas-Nebraska act was passed, there was the Missouri Compromise of 1820. The Missouri Compromise is what set of the boundaries between free states and slave states. It caused fights between the North and the South because the North had more land for states, while the South didn’t have much. The Kansas-Nebraska act allowed white settlers decide if Kansas and/or Nebraska should be a free or slave state. This is called popular sovereignty.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Passed by Congress in may of 1854, the Kansas Nebraska Act may be the most significant of the Pre-Civil War compromises. It admitted the Kansas and Nebraska as states, but rather than decide whether the territories would become slave or non-slave states based on their location in relation to the 36’ 30° line, they were allowed to choose for themselves. Kansas and Nebraska were not the only ones allowed to decide though, each territory was allowed to choose for itself if it would be a slave or non-slave state. This allowing of territories to choose slave or non-slave is called popular sovereignty. In popular sovereignty the people of the territory vote to decide if they will become a slave state or a non-slave state.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America expanded quickly, but it didn’t come without controversy. The country was divided on whether slavery should flourish or be abolished. Slavery was dividing the country, with a Civil War in the makings. It is long debated what the cause was, and therefore it is unknown which specific event caused the war. The many speeches given by citizens and politicians, the Compromise of 1850, and the Dred Scott Decision are largely considered to be the main causes of the Civil War.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Douglas believed that popular sovereignty was the answer to solve the ongoing conflict. Popular Sovereignty allows people of the state to decide if the state should be a free state or a slave state. On the other hand, Lincoln believed that slavery was a national issue and would lead to the nation’s separation. Lincoln also said that the Declaration of Independence applied to everyone even African Americans. The government made sure that there was an equal number of slave states and free states to avoid the issue of slavery.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    America formed many compromises to resolve political disputes between the years of 1820 and 1860. Many of political uprisings were caused by the conflict over slavery; should slavery be legal, or abolished? The Second Great Awakening was a religious reform in the early nineteenth century America, preachers like Charles Finney travelled around the world to lecture people about the importance of religion. These preachers lectured to their audience that their sins could be cleansed forever.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the Missouri Compromise was drawn up there was little to no objection; maintaining the balance of slave and free states seemed far enough. But then more issues arose when…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main political purpose of the Kansas-Nebraska Act was to preserve the union. The unity of the United States has also been in danger because of the geographic divide created by slavery, and this act was created to make sure the southern states would not split. Rather than only creating Nebraska (which would most likely be a free state and throw off the balance of free versus slave states), the act was passed which created Kansas, which would most likely become a slave state. Had Kansas not been created the southern states would have gotten mad, and possibly split from the…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Brown Dbq Essay

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This claim drew a political wedge among the Democratic and the developed Republican Party that Lincoln was a part of. The abolitionist perspective of the North attributed to their growing hostility towards the southerner’s ideals about slavery as shown in Lincoln’s denouncement of southern ideals. Frederick Douglass, a free African-American author, reminisced about his relationship with John Brown and how he respected him very much, so much to claim that it is an “honor to ourselves in doing and honor to him, for it implies the possession of qualities akin to his” (F). Frederick’s heightened respect for Brown stems from Brown’s purpose of his cause. John Brown sought to free slaves in his attack on Harpers Ferry.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was slave who sued for his liberty in the Missouri courts, arguing that four years on free soil had made him free. He was once owned by army surgeon John Emerson. Dred Scott’s attorney argued that between 1831 and 1833, John Emerson had taken Scott with him during various military postings to areas where the Missouri Compromise banned slavery, making Dred Scott a free man. When nearly after six years in the Missouri courts, the state Supreme Court rejected this argument in 1852, Dred Scott, with the help of abolitionist lawyers, appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a 7 to 2 decision, the Court ruled against Dred Scott.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Douglas addressed Lincoln’s opinion in his speech. He was happy to get an answer from Lincoln about african americans citizenship and eligibility for office. (“Fourth Debate: Charleston, Illinois.” National Parks Service. Lincoln’s first speech, paragraph 1 and Douglas’ response speech, paragraph 1) Lincoln lost the election for the Senate seat of Illinois to Douglas but would later beat him in the Presidential Election of 1860.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nat Turner Rebellion

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Shortly following in 1854 was the Kansas-Nebraska act, granting the two territories the choice of slavery by vote of popularity. Advocates of both pro and anti slavery went to Kansas and ended in a bloodshed that lasted into 1861. During this violent bloodshed, the case of Dred Scott vs. Sanford was brought up in Virginia. This decision by the supreme court was one of the strongest triggers of what was the beginning of the civil war. Justice Roger B. Taney noted during the hearing, “[African American’s] had no rights which the white man was bound to respect” (Give Me Liberty!, 389).…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays