Pros And Cons Of The Lincoln-Douglas Debates

Improved Essays
The Lincoln-Douglas debates, also known as the Great Debates of 1858, were a series of seven debates between two politicians running for the senate seat of the state of Illinois. The politicians were the republican nominee, Abraham Lincoln, and the democratic nominee, incumbent Stephen Douglas. The debates covered a series of topics, the most pertinent being the issue of slavery and its expansion into the newer western territories. The idea of the debates came forth after both Lincoln and Douglass had given speeches opposing one another in two of Illinois’ congressional districts. Lincoln and Douglas agreed to the series of seven debates in the remaining congressional districts: Ottawa, Freeport, Jonesboro, Charleston, Galesburg, Quincy, and …show more content…
Due to this statement, Douglas, in the first debate held in Ottawa, attempted to portray Lincoln as an abolitionist saying that his party was a “Black Republican party, who are in favor of the citizenship of the Negro”. Lincoln disputed this however, stating that the black man “…is not my equal in many respects… But in the right to eat the bread without the leave of anybody else, which his own hand earns, he is my equal… and the equal of every living man”. He continued to say leading up to the final debate the city of Alton, that the declaration of independence “intended to include all men, but they did not mean to declare all men equal in all respects”. He further disputed Douglas’ claims that he was an abolitionist through his support of the fugitive slave act which returned escaped slaves in the north to their owners back south. Lincoln stated that the point of his debates was not to abolish slavery in the old southern states but to stop it from spreading to the newer territories acquired in the …show more content…
Sandford. Lincoln tried to force Douglas to choose between his principle of popular sovereignty proposed in his Kansas-Nebraska Act which created the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska and endowed the citizens the legislative power to decide, through popular sovereignty, whether or not they would allow slavery, and the decision reached by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case. The case surrounded an enslaved African American man that was suing for his freedom after being held captive within the boundaries of two free states. The issues before the court had been whether or not entering “free” territory made a slave free and whether this freedom granted blacks the ability to sue in federal court. The justices ruled that under the language of the constitution did not apply to blacks because within the context of when the constitution was written, slaves were seen solely as property and had no rights. This Decision of the justices as well as the Kansas-Nebraska Act voided the Missouri

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Before the election of 1860, Stephen Douglas and Abraham Lincoln had already ran against each other in the senatorial campaign for Illinois in 1859. (The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica. “Lincoln-Douglas Debates.” Paragraph 1). During the senatorial campaign Lincoln and Douglas had seven debates throughout the state of Illinois, these were known as the Great Debates. Slavery was the main issue the candidates debated over, as it was also a popular topic during this time.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1856, the trial carried up to the Supreme Court where a decision was made. The Supreme Court said that Dred Scott could not sue for his freedom because he was a slave under Missouri law and slaves are considered property, thus not being able to sue. The decision was that there was nothing in their power that they could do to make people slaves or free. This angered many Northerners where they believed that slavery should be illegal compared to the Southerners, who were pleased because they believed that slavery should be legal. Tensions got worse until the South could not handle it in the most important election in American history.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The first debate took place in Ottawa in front of about 10,000-12,000 people. Douglas opened up the debate and referred to Lincoln as a radical abolitionist and asked him the following seven questions: “I desire to know whether Lincoln to-day stands, as he did in 1854, in favor of the unconditional repeal of the fugitive slave law?” “I desire him to answer whether he stands pledged to-day, as he did in 1854, against the admission of any more slave states into the Union, even if the people want them?” “I want to know whether he stands pledged against the admission of a new state into the Union with such a constitution as the people of the that State may see fit to make?” “I want to know whether he stands to-day pledged to the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia?” “I desire him to answer whether he stands pledged to the prohibition of the slave-trade between the different States.” “I desire to know…

    • 1890 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the Missouri Compromise was repealed in 1854, congress passed the Kansas- Nebraska act, which allowed states and territories to decide for themselves whether they allow slavery. Following its repeal, violent opposition throughout Kansas and Illinois caused the Republican party to be revived with Lincoln on its side. Generally speaking, Lincoln did stand against slavery, but he didn’t believe on the level of morale. Instead, he believed that slavery was a bad economic development. In summary, Lincoln did not believe that slaves were equal to white men, but believed that the founding fathers meant that all men were created with certain inalienable rights.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln and Douglas Debates The Lincoln and Douglas debates of 1858 were seven debates between Abraham Lincoln who was a republican candidate for the United States Senate from Illinois. Stephen Douglas who was a senator in the Democratic Party candidate. During the time United State Senators were elected by state legislatures. They were trying to win control of the Illinois legislature. They decided to hold one debate in each of the nine congressional districts of Illinois.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tying in with Stephen Douglas was the Dred Scott court case. Dred Scott was an African American who sued for his freedom on the basis that he lived on free soil, and was therefore free. However, the court decided that because Scott was a black slave, and not a citizen, he could not sue in federal court. As a result, African Americans were no longer citizens in both the North and South. This case also dictated that there was no such thing as a free state.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case went the distance to the United States Supreme Court. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Roger B. Taney, was a previous slave proprietor from Maryland. The United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks - slaves as well as free - were not and could never become citizens of the United States. Court’s majority decided that because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue. The framers of the Constitution, believed that blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Alexander Stephen who was the Vice President of the Confederacy encouraged the people of the South too take action for what they believed in. The speech done by Stephens was before the start of the war, and its purpose was to explain the reason for the succession, difference in ideologies, and to defend slavery. Alexander Stephens asserted that, “upon the great truth that the Negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition” (Stephens, 3). He believes that African ‘American people’s natural state is to be a slave.Throughout his speech, Stephen is essentially encouraging the people of the South to fight back for their rights that are being taken away by the North. Stephen believes that without fighting back, the North will just take away the rights of the South.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln praised Henry Clay and his ideology, so he adopted the same ideology when debating. “I never had an opinion upon the subject of slavery in my life that I did not get from him.” Abraham Lincoln really looked up to the same belief the Whigs had. Lincoln also stated that blacks should not be treated as equals in all matters. (124) This vaguely describes how he is not specific on how they should be equal and how they should…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Next, Taney affirmed that the fifth amendment did not allow for seizing of one’s property and since slaves were considered property he could not be freed. Lastly, Taney came to the conclusion that the Northwest ordinance of 1787 and the Missouri Compromise of 1820 were unconstitutional. Southerners were content with the decision of the court because it served as a defense for their rights, the ownership of slaves. In a sense the Dred Scott decision was a justification to Southerners to allow slavery in new territories, such as Kansas, thus, angering Northerners and increasing sectional tension. Conflict in Kansas demonstrated the causes of the Civil War and it’s timing.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays