Kansas Abraska Act And The Mexican-American War

Improved Essays
Slavery was a very big topic of debate in the United States during the 1800s. What typically happened was, the northern population was anti-slavery, and the southern population was pro-slavery. With the expansion of the United States' borders, came the expansion of slavery. Many groups of people were widely opposed to this expansion of slavery, and in events like the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the Mexican-American War, many arguments arose regarding the moral and political effect of this expansion. The moral argument of both the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the Mexican-American War, was that slavery is simply not right. The whole practice of trading, selling, and forcing humans to work, and justifying it because their skin is a different color, in the eyes of the abolitionists is not morally correct. They believed the treatment, and practice of slavery was inhumane and they wanted to stop the spread of slavery. …show more content…
The main political purpose of the Kansas-Nebraska Act was to preserve the union. The unity of the United States has also been in danger because of the geographic divide created by slavery, and this act was created to make sure the southern states would not split. Rather than only creating Nebraska (which would most likely be a free state and throw off the balance of free versus slave states), the act was passed which created Kansas, which would most likely become a slave state. Had Kansas not been created the southern states would have gotten mad, and possibly split from the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Bleeding America The Kansas-Nebraska Act, a act proposed by "Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democratic Senator from Illinois who introduced the Kansas-Nebraska Act"1 in hopes for the nation to build a transcontinental-railroad, hopefully having the eastern terminus in Chicago, but the railroad needed to be secure as it was going to go through the Kansas and Nebraska territories, preferably as states. Being a personal advocate of popular sovereignty, Stephen A. Douglas disliked the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and believed that the state should decide if it wants to be a free-state or a slave-state. Although the North and South were clearly different culturally and economically, separated by their own definition of the American Dream, the passing…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The north disagreed with the Kansas-Nebraska Act because they felt that it was for slavery and went against laws. Many different court cases also showed how America…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1820 To 1860 Dbq Essay

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Americans during the early nineteenth century were trying to reach for compromise to solve their political disputes, but by 1860 compromise seemed unattainable. The years between 1820 and 1860 were a time of vast change for the newly free colonies and each citizen had different ideas on what advancements from there would look like. All the disputes revolved around one thing: slavery. The issue proved to be explosive by 1860 when the nation realized the Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850, which were passed to bring a sense of unity, seemed to be done in vain as they hardly made a dent in the issues at hand. Voters joined political parties and voted for officials based on their attitudes toward slavery, the issue caused sectional divides between the North and South, and different cultural events…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Expansionist Campaigns

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    northerns, in congressional debate of 1850, stated they would accepted Cuba into the Union only if that state applied under the Wilmot Proviso, where no new territory or state would incorporate slavery. Douglas wanted to expand to Latin American and other Caribbean/tropical islands in the South, but for what purpose? National pride? Yes, to expand and grow American but at what cost to the American slaves? Northerners became very nervous that Douglas extreme expansionist policies would expand slavery even farther south while southerners praised Douglas’s efforts to expand down south.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most controversial topic preceding and following the ratification of the United States Constitution was states’ rights. Additionally, the distribution of a state’s power ultimately determines the variability of laws and standards throughout a nation. With an incredibly visible divide between northern and southern states on whether slavery should be permitted in the 1770s-1860s, states’ rights became an inevitable conflict. States’ rights were more concerning for states with large slave populations because of the dependency on slave labor for economic benefits. Although there were several prominent figures who opposed slavery, such as Thomas…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the early and mid-1800s, sectional tensions arose throughout America. Sectionalism, or the loyalty to a particular subsegment of the Nation, rather than loyalty to the United States as a whole, was a pervasive characteristic of this period. Many factors contributed to these sectional tensions, however, the most divisive factor among the parties was the controversy over slavery. Slavery during this time was largely well-accepted in the South, but typically denigrated in the North. When the institution of slavery was condemned and threatened by the North, many southerners felt that their very survival and way of life was at risk.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Long-Term Effects Of Slavery

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages

    1. Describe and explain how slavery affected the economic, social, and political development of the South during the first half of the nineteenth century. Why did Slavery become the essential difference between the North and the South? What are the long-term effects of slavery?…

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the period in which the national debate on the westward expansion of slavery took place, there were many events that occurred to actually make up the national debate on the westward expansion of slavery. During Tallmadge’s speech to congress in 1819 he made a proposal of an amendment. In Tallmadge’s proposal to congress he first stated that within the slaveholding States he did not intend to change the fact that they were slave states and that if he did this it would later on lead to war. So he proposed that past the banks of the Mississippi in new territory where there is no slavery there should not be any in the future, in other words stop the expansion of slavery into new states.…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Henry Ward Beecher raised money to provide weapons to those who opposed slavery in these territories and called these weapons “Beecher’s Bibles” as a result of the act. This is also an example of the beginning of increased passion for slavery or the demise of slavery on each side. By far the most significant effect after the Kansas-Nebraska Act, however, would have to be the demise of the Whig Party, along with the division of the Democratic Party and the creation of the Republican Party. These changed political standings scared the South immensely and directly ushered them to take the path of secession for fear of a strong Republican Party and a weak Democratic…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act has been called the most significant law ever enacted by the Congress of the United States. It was called the most significant law ever enacted because it allowed people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. The law had three major features, which were a larger territory of Nebraska was dissected into two smaller territories, Kanas and Nebraska, the dissolution of the Missouri compromise, and the new territories would determine its slavery status based on popular sovereignty. When the new law went into effect pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed to Kansas, each side hoping to determine the results of the first election. Instead…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was the United States Justified in Going to War with Mexico? Boom! Shots fired as the U.S went to war with Mexico in 1846. After a fight on disputed land, and constant struggle between the two nations, the U.S finally decided to declare war on Mexico.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lincoln-Douglas debates, also known as the Great Debates of 1858, were a series of seven debates between two politicians running for the senate seat of the state of Illinois. The politicians were the republican nominee, Abraham Lincoln, and the democratic nominee, incumbent Stephen Douglas. The debates covered a series of topics, the most pertinent being the issue of slavery and its expansion into the newer western territories. The idea of the debates came forth after both Lincoln and Douglass had given speeches opposing one another in two of Illinois’ congressional districts. Lincoln and Douglas agreed to the series of seven debates in the remaining congressional districts: Ottawa, Freeport, Jonesboro, Charleston, Galesburg, Quincy, and…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abolitionist pleaded for fellow Americans to ignore the legalities of returning runaway slaves back to the owners. The conflicts of the Abolitionist against the pro slave barring Americans was becoming a strong confrontational argument, mostly involving the North and the South. This argument among other issues eventually leads way to the succession of the South and the Civil war in further dates.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not long afterwards, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 took place. This repealed the Missouri Compromise. Kansas and Nebraska were both to vote using popular sovereignty to decide on slavery. Both pro-slavery settlers and anti-slavery settlers rushed to the area to gain the upper hand of the states, resulting in absolute chaos. As a result states’ rights and Manifest Destiny played a role in the cause of the Civil War.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri compromise had prohibited slavery north of 36 degrees do north, but groups of settlers in Kansas who had come from slave states, like Missouri, believed slavery should be permitted in the territory. Other settlers were from the North and wanted to make the area a free state. The result was upheaval and rioting. The fighting carried east by abolitionist John Brown who believed the will of God justified violence and would overthrow slavery. Brown and his followers, seven of whom were black, attacked and occupied the federal arsenal in Harpers Ferry in 1859 in a failed attempt to arm a slave rebellion.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays