Secession Of 1860 Dbq Essay

Improved Essays
The secession of the Union in 1861 was mainly caused by the argument over slavery, but there were other factors that caused the Union to secede also; for an example the election of 1860 when Abraham Lincoln became president of United States. The South was also seceding for the control of the west and the north's constant opposition of the southern culture expanding. Slavery was the main part of the secession because southerner planters owned most of the slaves due to the abundance of land and the lack of labor. Of course, the North did not understand this because they were mostly industry and railroads not farming (doc 8). During this time, western territories were becoming states and, therefore, there were arguments if the territories would enter as slave states or free states. When the Missouri Compromise was drawn up there was little to no objection; maintaining the balance of slave and free states seemed far enough. But then more issues arose when …show more content…
The Compromise of 1850 stated the California would enter as a free state, but Utah and New Mexico would also enter and determine if they were a free or slave state by popular sovereignty of the residents; both were declared as free states (doc 5). The Fugitive Slave Act also came into existence because of the Compromise of 1850; something in favor of the south, if it would have been enforced. The North ignored the Fugitive Slave Act and freed escaped slaves. As if the Southern and Northern states couldn't disagree more, the Dred Scott decision drew them even more apart and pushed the south a little closer to secession (doc 7). In 1854, Stephen Douglas introduces the Kansas-Nebraska Act which then creates Kansas and Nebraska territories and they again are decided if they are slave or free territories by popular sovereignty (doc 6). This cancels

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Prior to the time of the Missouri compromise, there were an equal number of slave states to free states thus there was an equal balance of power in congress. Once Missouri had applied for admission into the union there was instant disapproval from the northern territories for they had thought that the south already had a substantial amount of power. The Missouri compromise was a way to balance congress of free and slave states. The compromise itself was passed in 1820 giving Missouri the title of a slave state and Maine the title of a free state. Therefore it settled a rising dispute between the slave and free territories.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The South seceded on December 20th 1860 and the first state to secede was South Carolina. The Secession was the South trying to take over power. The States that seceded next were Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, and Mississippi. During this secession West Virginia was made as a new state and the Confederate States of America was made as a new country. The president of the new country was Jefferson Davis.…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the Missouri Compromise there was a lot of tension between the North and South because of slavery. Though it became even more heated after the Missouri’s 1819 request for admission into the Union as a slave state, which threatened the balance between slave and free states. The reason why the balance was disrupted was because before the request from Missouri there were an even amount of slave and free states. As well as, it would set a precedent for congressional consensus to the increase of slavery. So, to help ease the tension between the states Congress created a two-part compromise, which is known as the Missouri Compromise.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise divided the nation into two separate parts, free or slave states. Popular sovereignty allowed the states to choose whether or not they would be free. As read in the text, “What then we do insist on, is, not to extend slavery, but that we shall not be prohibited from immigrating with our property, into the Territories of the United States” (Document 8). The South wanted to bring slavery with them and believed they had the right to do so. Although, in the North it was decided that slavery would be abolished and they would all be free states.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an era where slavery was viewed as a profitable and reputable source of wealth, income, power, and an economic driving force, divisions amongst opinions added fuel to the flame for an unavoidable conflict to ignite. The Missouri Compromise came about for views, even within a time with which like-mindedness was prized and raised to the highest of glories on a pedestal, vastly varied on the issue of slavery and its seemingly rather loosely tied boundaries. With two opposing sides, the North for the removal of slavery and the South in favor of its continued existence -- territorial issues were heavy on the mind. Though often revered as being a more verbal form of compromise that laid out specific boundaries within the states, or two states…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry Clay came up with the Compromise of 1850, and it was passed with the help of Senator Stephen Douglas. This compromise allowed Utah to become either a free or slave state depending on popular sovereignty, banned slave markets from Washington D.C., and allowed the Tougher Fugitive Slave Act to pass. It was a considerably even win for all, since both the northerners and southerners got a piece of what they wanted. The dispute over slavery in new territories was settled yet again for that time…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Analysis

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The South seceded the Union because of arguement with the national government power. “Many Southerners favored secession as part of the idea that the states have rights and powers which the federal government cannot legally deny” (Doc 5).The North and South had disagreements between slavery and states rights which leads to political issues. The north and South had political issues because slavery was over because of Abraham Lincoln and they wanted to…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas attempted to pass both the Kansas-Nebraska Act, as well as the Compromise of 1850. He sought to repeal the ban of slavery north of the 36 degree 30” line previously established in the Missouri Compromise and to admit California as a slave state. In so doing, he sparked political controversy creating a divide between between anti-slavery (typically Northern) and pro-slavery (typically southern) politicians. These pro-slavery laws ignited widespread anger throughout the North, creating fissures within political parties which would eventually lead to divisions within them. Additionally, the numerous Acts passed in an effort to appease each side of the slavery controversy, also undermined the Country’s overall domestic tranquility.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the civil war, the states was separate with their own rule of living. The north was full of free state and the south was full of slave states. In this country, slaves was necessary for making money. Yet, they treat them as they was not human even in the free states. The north made a thing called the union with will bring everyone together but, the south didn't want to be apart of it.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The idea of secession was a term used since the foundation of the United States. “South Carolina threatened separation when the Continual Congress south to tax all the colonies on the basis of a total population count that would include slaves.” (history.com) As time went on the divide between the north and the south increased. Abolition attacked the social structure of the south and the southern people felt that their liberties were being attacked.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the 1850s, slavery, and other political issues between the states, became a sizable issue. Slavery began to dissect people. For example, the Northerners began to begin support free soil and abolition. However, the Southerners disagreed, and tension increased dramatically. Soon, the Southern slaveowners felt that their rights were no longer being illustrated, and felt that they must succeed (secession is the act of withdrawing from an organization, union, military alliance or especially a political entity, to be protected from Northern abuse.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 brought Missouri into America as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Everything above the Louisiana Purchase Boundary line, with the exception of Missouri, banned slavery. This action resulted in maintaining an equal representation for both the North and the South in the Senate. Following this, the Compromise of 1850 allowed California to be admitted as a free state, however popular sovereignty would be used in the land of the Mexican Cession. This caused controversy within the states.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism Dbq

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Early in the eighteen hundreds, the Missouri Compromise was written to declare which states were to be known as slave states and free states. A line was drawn across the United States at latitude 36°30′ stating that each state to the north of the line and east of the Mississippi River is a free state and each state south of the line and east of the…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secession Essay

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although the Northern states and the Southern states had their differences in their beliefs, on profuse occasions—specifically on slavery—compromises had squelch down the bad blood between them. However, in 1789, even after the Constitution was adopted by all of the States to amalgamate as a nation, for more than thirty years, the temporarily ceased frictions between the North and South went to and fro once more. Thus, by 1861, these opposing ideals between the disputants were so prodigious that the compromises do not seem enticing to either antithetical stance. Henceforth, this led to the secession of the Southern states, much to the Northern states’ disgust and eventually to the Civil War.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays