Why Did The Missouri Compromise Occur

Improved Essays
Before the Missouri Compromise there was a lot of tension between the North and South because of slavery. Though it became even more heated after the Missouri’s 1819 request for admission into the Union as a slave state, which threatened the balance between slave and free states. The reason why the balance was disrupted was because before the request from Missouri there were an even amount of slave and free states. As well as, it would set a precedent for congressional consensus to the increase of slavery. So, to help ease the tension between the states Congress created a two-part compromise, which is known as the Missouri Compromise. To ease the tension Congress granted Missouri’s request which allowed it to become a slave state but also passed an amendment that drew an imaginary line across the Louisiana Territory. …show more content…
Representative James Tallmadge even tried to propose an amendment which would essentially end slavery, during the time the Missouri request but the effort was defeated. The debate whether Missouri should be a slave or free state occurred for over a year. Northerners argued that Congress than had the power to prohibit slavery while the Southerners said they should have the freedom to choose whether the state should be slave or not. Though after a lot of debate they were soon able to come up with a compromise. The first part of the compromise was Missouri was admitted as a slave state while Maine was a free state. Than the second part of the compromise was with the exception of Missouri slavery would be forbidden from the Louisiana territory to the north latitude of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Prior to the time of the Missouri compromise, there were an equal number of slave states to free states thus there was an equal balance of power in congress. Once Missouri had applied for admission into the union there was instant disapproval from the northern territories for they had thought that the south already had a substantial amount of power. The Missouri compromise was a way to balance congress of free and slave states. The compromise itself was passed in 1820 giving Missouri the title of a slave state and Maine the title of a free state. Therefore it settled a rising dispute between the slave and free territories.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery was an issue in slave states from South and Free states North in 1800s. South states were the agricultural area so they needed slaves and support it, but not the North state. Several disputes exists, Congress performed compromises to settle these disputes. But these compromises could not hold for longer. (1820 - 1861: HOLDING THE UNION TOGETHER)…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Significance of the Missouri Compromise and the Monroe Doctrine The Missouri Compromise and the Monroe Doctrine were two of the most important documents written in the presidency of James Monroe (Shi 2016). Both were received much debate and mixed reviews, but have great significance in American History. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 came about as a result of fear in the South that states added from the western territories would be admitted as free states and cause an imbalance (Shi 2016). At the time, the states were equally divided, eleven slave states and eleven free states.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many political issues had detrimental effects that caused the Civil War. One of those issues being the Missouri Compromise, which took place in 1820. The reasoning behind the Missouri compromise was due to the South feeling that since the North had gained Maine, as a free state, that the political power would be much stronger than it would be in the South. Therefore, Missouri was to become a slave state, which then also created the cutoff line for free and slave states. The Missouri compromise was not a problem that was solved quickly, the entire process took about two years to solve.…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise divided the nation into two separate parts, free or slave states. Popular sovereignty allowed the states to choose whether or not they would be free. As read in the text, “What then we do insist on, is, not to extend slavery, but that we shall not be prohibited from immigrating with our property, into the Territories of the United States” (Document 8). The South wanted to bring slavery with them and believed they had the right to do so. Although, in the North it was decided that slavery would be abolished and they would all be free states.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    the Union from the Northwest Territory. Missouri, which was obtained through the Louisiana Purchase, requested for admission as a slave state only contributed to the fears that slavery was expanding northward. Representative of New York, James Tallmadge, Jr., proposed two amendments to the Missouri statehood bill in 1819. First, it proposed the prohibition of any further slaves into Missouri. Secondly, he proposed the gradual emancipation for slaves currently there.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Luckily, the Civil War was delayed due to various settlements between political parties regarding slavery- such as the Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was proposed by Representative Henry Clay from Kentucky. Clay came up with this after Missouri demanded to become a state, which would have upset the existing balance among free and slave states. The compromise resulted in Missouri admitted as a slave state and Maine carved out of Massachusetts as a free state.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A). Although the Compromise of 1850, devised by Henry Clay, seemed to satisfy the states, it allowed slavery to exist above the 36’30’ line which had previously been defined by the Missouri Compromise in 1820. With Popular Sovereignty being one of the Compromise of 1850’s main focuses, states north of the 36’30’ line could now be admitted as slave states shall they choose to do so. Although the Compromise of 1850 seemed to…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Era Of Good Feelings

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The period after the War of 1812 was christened the Era of Good Feelings because of the nationalistic spirit, high morale, and unfamiliar cooperation among politicians that flourished during the time. Following the War of 1812, the Democratic-Republicans established an essentially one-party system, embracing some of the policies of the inactive Federalist Party and thereby eliminating hostility between the two parties. Although there was a rising spirit of nationalism and morale, the Era of Good Feelings was also marked by sectionalism, divisions within the Democratic-Republican Party, and strife over tariffs, the national bank, and internal improvements. The growing sectionalism can be attributed to both the friction between the North and…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It received backlash from both the south and the north, “The Missouri Compromise…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois was the man who decided to put this act into effect. At the time, the Missouri Compromise was in effect that stated that no slave territories be added into the Union above the 36o30’ line, which Kansas and Nebraska both were above, but anything below that line may be added in as a slave stateZ. Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democrat, stated in the act that the people of the territory were allowed to vote on the subject of slavery in their territory. Douglas, who was a pro slavery senator as most Democrats were, was all in favor of this act that completely disregards the terms and conditions of the Missouri Compromise. On the other hand, many of the Northern abolitionists at the time disagreed completely with the idea because of the fact it would allow slavery into territories it should not. This is a strong instance in which the country was divided into north and south based on the argument of slavery in new territories.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 brought Missouri into America as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Everything above the Louisiana Purchase Boundary line, with the exception of Missouri, banned slavery. This action resulted in maintaining an equal representation for both the North and the South in the Senate. Following this, the Compromise of 1850 allowed California to be admitted as a free state, however popular sovereignty would be used in the land of the Mexican Cession. This caused controversy within the states.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism Dbq

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Early in the eighteen hundreds, the Missouri Compromise was written to declare which states were to be known as slave states and free states. A line was drawn across the United States at latitude 36°30′ stating that each state to the north of the line and east of the Mississippi River is a free state and each state south of the line and east of the…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Missouri Compromise, all territory North of the 36˚ 30’ line would be admitted as…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays