Dred Scott was taken to court in Illinois, where he asked for freedom. He was granted freedom, but then he went to Louisiana, and he was not granted freedom. He then appealed to the U.S. Appeals Court, and the Dred Scott vs. Sandford (it had meant to be the Dred Scott vs. Sanford, but the person who had written the case down had miswritten it, therefore it has been vs. Sandford) case had said that he is not free. That case was quite obviously, quite outrageous. …show more content…
Presumably, the reason why they were happy was because that meant that they could kick runaway slaves out of the north and into the south. People in the south were also happy with the decision since that meant that they can send searches for slaves regardless of where they are in the U.S. The downside to having nationwide searches is that grants were given to those who would find slaves, and if they were in the south, then the grant given would be considerably lower usually. But the grants in the north would be lower than those out of the