Descartes Compare Contrast Essay

Improved Essays
Descartes believes that a person should not rely on their senses to give them proof of absolute truths. However, based on the idea of the Painter’s Analogy, a person must put some trust in their senses to have any experiences at all, dreamed or not. According to Descartes, one’s faith in knowledge can not be derived entirely from their senses, as sometimes, our senses fail us, or are even dreamed (Descartes 3). Despite this finding, this statement is referring to broad topics, and when we examine the smaller pieces of the grand scheme, we can understand that we must perceive to dream. Descartes himself has this theory, but believes that an empiricist view, which states “that all knowledge is derived from sense experience”, is too far of an

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Essay 3 Given what we know or can safely assume to be true of animal brains and behaviors, do animals actually exhibit thought and reason? The answer depends in large measure on one’s definition of thought and reason. Philosophers René Descartes and David Hume hold conflicting views about the nature and possession of thought and reason and, as a result, offer starkly different arguments for and against the existence of thought and reason in animals. While Descartes maintains in Part Five of Discourse on Method that only humans are capable of conscious thought, Hume asserts that human and animal behaviors are not so different in Section Nine of his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to Nicholas of Cusa and Rene Descartes and their ideas of the infinite, the differences are many while the similarities are few. Nicholas of Cusa, who lived from 1401 to 1464, recognized the open-ended, positive aspect of nature which later led him to view the infinite as a never-ending circle; a changing and developing circle that is. In contrast, Rene Descartes, who lived from 1596 to 1650, struggled with trusting whether or not the world even exists outside of the private ego—to him, the two were blended. Descartes, later, came to the conclusion to use his own knowledge in proving certain aspects of the infinite, which would, in a way, strengthen his arguments. Despite their different approaches and ideas, in general, of the infinite, these two philosophers came to find important realizations of human nature and the world around them.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Barry Stroud and Elizabeth Wolgast provide different approaches to answer and understanding of the paradigm established in the argument. The context of the argument from ignorance that Descartes proposes is problematic when attempting to answer it . In Wolgast’s perspective, the argument from ignorance claims that the knowledge that one is not dreaming is a necessary condition to determine the existence of the external world. Under such circumstances, Wolgast claims that by considering ‘know’ as a necessary condition, then it becomes more difficult to provide evidence that will suffice the skeptic—…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The purpose of Descartes’ argument of doubt is to encourage us to doubt the truth in everything. Some would argue that the doubt argument is not valid because its conclusion does not follow its premises. While this is a strong observation, it overlooks the three arguments Descartes’ used to strengthen his premise on doubt - perceptual illusion, the dream problem, and a deceiving god. In the first case, perceptual illusion illustrates that things are not always just as they seem and since we cannot all be sure about what is true and what is not, it is our best interest to doubt any sensory knowledge. The dream problem claims that it is possible to doubt any physical thing actually exists and that there is an external world.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To attack a piece of accepted knowledge is bold to say the least, and here Descartes’ focus is to better justify how one can credibly dispute anything. The idea of cutting an idea by the roots, as the tree metaphor is prominent, is new but also the way that is most effective in differentiating from the reality of life. Descartes poses the idea that as much as one can fool themselves to believe they are not dreaming, it is never certain whether we are in a physical conscious state. This idea is rather perplexing as, when looked deeper into, holds no faults. It can be said that any physical senses are not present in the dream state, but it is not necessarily true to everyone.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosopher Rene Descartes wrote an influential piece named the “Meditations on First Philosophy.” In this work, his “First Meditation” mainly deals with doubt of existence and how doubt is made possible because of sensory deception. He creates the dream argument that argues about how it is possible to be uncertain about whether or not a person is in a real world or dream world. In philosopher G.E. Moore’s “Certainty” he attempts to debunk Descartes’ argument through showing the inconsistencies in his dream argument. Since Descartes’ argument is built on inconsistency, Moore’s replies are satisfactory.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First of all, let’s start with the definition of Dream Hypothesis. “The dream hypothesis is to claim or demand that it provides some basic evidence and the senses we trust to differentiate reality from illusion cannot be trusted completely, and therefore, any thought that we think or feel or have senses should at the very least be carefully examined and rigorously tested to determine whether it is, in fact, a reality” (From the abstract). Basically, we have to revise rigorously before we make the decisions. Now, according to Descartes about the dream hypothesis, when a person dreams, they can see many things that are very specifically clear but those things actually are not present at the moment or do not exist at all. Similarly, we see many dreams…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rene Descartes’ statement, “I at least know for certain that nothing is certain” perfectly illustrates the multiple problems that arise when all rational beings realize that their senses can deceive them and that the very foundation of their knowledge is based on the assumption that everything they encounter is real. Thankfully, being aware of the problem is the first step in solving it. The juxtaposition of Rene Descartes and William Shakespeare reveals a difference of opinion when they set out to examine and solve the problems that arise from the doubtfulness of the knowledge provided by our senses. Although both authors agree on the importance of solitude and the potential problem of an evil genius manipulating our senses, Descartes’ use…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opinion on Descartes My view on Descartes Meditations are false, and I believe this because there is too many things that could go wrong in the Matrix theory. Descartes says, “I have convinced myself that there is nothing in the world-no sky, no Earth, no minds, no bodies.” I completely disagree with this because how can everything we believe in be false? I will go through how I believe Descartes is incorrect, and why I believe in this.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes work ‘Meditations on First Philosophy’ is filled with his many ideas on God, the relationship between the mind and body and the trustworthiness of things we believe to be true. The main focus of this essay is his arguments for distrusting the senses. These are the dreaming argument and the evil demon argument. Meditations begins with Descartes casting doubt on everything he once believed to be absolutely true. It is a search for absolute certainty.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It can be possible that our dream, could be just our imagination and Descartes tried to solve this problem (Malcolm, 2010). Descartes created a core for knowledge, “the cogito”, which means “I think, therefore I am” which was partly the solution in providing knowledge for ourselves (Malcolm, 2010). However, Descartes claims that beyond our own thoughts is a reality of senses, but those senses could deceive us (Samuels,…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While one is awake he or she has control over his or her decisions he or she may make throughout each experience, but while dreaming, there is no control in the choices made and the dreamer lacks sense of touch. These signs contradict the second premise that one cannot distinguish between experiences, therefore refuting Descartes’ dream argument. René Descartes was born in France in 1596 to a family of mainly doctors and lawyers. As an adolescent, he obtained a solid background of education in the liberal arts, and later received a degree in civil and canon law. After working on different essays and his methods, he started working on the Meditations on First Philosophy in 1639, and Meditations in its entirety, which is composed of six Meditations, was first published in 1641, and a second edition in 1642 (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy).…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates and Rene Descartes are alike in their most fundamental motives but yet contrasting in results both trying to improve thinking but about two different things. One example would be how they each convey their message formal versus informal, another would be their life style and beliefs of how things should be done. Both Socrates and Descartes have completely different views on getting their desired results, and the level of risk one is willing to take to accomplish certain results. Socrates and Descartes even had vastly different upbringing, and views on which sciences are important and others’ inferior to the rest.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays