Compare And Contrast Descartes And Dualism

Great Essays
“I think therefore I am,” the popular quote of philosopher Descartes, is the main premise of his theory of Mind-body Dualism. Interactionism is the theory that there are two realities, mind and body, each of which can have an effect on the other. In contrast, dualists claim that the mind and body are two separate realities. The body is a material thing that operates in a physical reality, while the mind and mental states operate in a nonphysical reality. For the dualist, the way of thinking is an internal thinking on the inside that is private. I fully agree with Descartes’s concept of dualism. The mind is a lot more than chemical reactions going on in the brain. Thoughts, feelings, desire are all properties of the mind but not its parts. I …show more content…
The purpose of Descartes’ argument of doubt is to encourage us to doubt the truth in everything. Some would argue that the doubt argument is not valid because its conclusion does not follow its premises. While this is a strong observation, it overlooks the three arguments Descartes’ used to strengthen his premise on doubt - perceptual illusion, the dream problem, and a deceiving god. In the first case, perceptual illusion illustrates that things are not always just as they seem and since we cannot all be sure about what is true and what is not, it is our best interest to doubt any sensory knowledge. The dream problem claims that it is possible to doubt any physical thing actually exists and that there is an external world. Finally, the deceiving God argument states that we believe that there is an all-powerful God who created us and who is omnipotent. …show more content…
The conceivability argument is based on the premise that the mind is a thinking thing, while the body is not. The argument claims that (1) it’s conceivable for me to exist without having a body, (2) whatever is conceivable is possible, (3) thus, it is possible for me to exist and not have a body, (4) if it is possible for me to exist without having a body, then having a body is not essential to me. Plato believed that the mind was immortal and was what continued to live on after the death of the body. Descartes believed the same, even going as far as saying that the mind can continue as a disembodied existence. Some would object to Descartes’ argument stating that while it is valid, it may not be sound. The most questionable premise is the first premise. There, Descartes states that it would be conceivable for him for him to exist and not have a body. However, this response fails because of the ability to reincarnate. Reincarnation is a form of life after death that helps to overcome some of the obstacles monists, materialist who believes that all of reality is material, face and that of conceivability and the two concepts of the physical. Reincarnation bases its belief on the immortality of the soul because it proves the indivisibility of the mind is independent from the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Yet, Descartes’ duality theory also suggests that the mind is separate from the body. Thus, in that example, the brain would represent the body because the mind is a concept without substance or physical properties – it interacts causally with the body. Therefore, without the body, the mind cannot interact with the real world, experience the senses that cause stimuli, or conclude the thinking that confirms existence. However, with the body, the mind cannot trust its senses - the whole premise of the Dream Argument for Skepticism. Therefore, according to Descartes, the mind is unable to determine its existence with the body, but is also unable to determine its existence without the body.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism is the idea that the mind and body are separate entities. Descartes saw the body as matter and geometrical qualities (legs, arms, feet, etc.), and the mind as one with the basic feature of thinking, that occurs in a spiritual realm. He stated that the body could never think and that the mind could not exist physically, in other words mental states could never explain physical things. He thought that the body was associated with matter and could be described as to having an extension, and the mind can not have an extension, or take up space, as it does not exist in a physical world (Leech, Oliver). Advocates of dualism, like Descartes, run into trouble on how to explain how the mental states and physical world interact and communicate.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my opinion, despite me admiration for Descartes, I conclude that the materialist’s response is a more resilient argument. There are many aspects of the materialists approach to answering the mind body problem that I find logistical and rational. More specifically, the materialist response delivers a strong point that disproves Descartes’ entire proclamation and that is the concept of neural phenomena. Scientific data has yet to disprove that all human mental phenomena are reliant upon neural phenomena stimulated by our senses. One can never observe the human minds’ functionality without also observing the human brain operating as well.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Substance dualism is the ontological view that there exists two sorts of substances; mental and physical (material and immaterial). The existence of the substances are fundamentally distinct and exist independently of each other. If the soul can survive the death of the body, then there is the possibility of an after-life. Plato and Descartes are notorious for substance dualism which is also known as mind-body dualism, the believe that the soul is able to live on without the presence of the physical substance, the body. In this essay I will describe and assess the argument of substance dualism postulated by Rene Descartes (1596-1650).…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In philosophy, a theory that includes the viewing of the the mind and body as being separate kinds of substances or natures is known as mind- body dualism. This stance implies that the mind and body not only differ in meaning but refer to different kinds of entities. Thus, a person that proposes the concept of dualism would oppose any theory that identifies mind with the brain, conceived as a physical operant. Descartes reaches this conclusion by arguing that the nature of the mind is completely and utterly distinct from that of the body, and therefore it is possible for one to exist without the other. This argument gives rise to the famous problem of mind-body causal interaction that are still commonly debated today: how can the mind cause…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This argument also acts as a segue into Descartes’ ongoing debate into the existence of God, as his verification of the scope of will and intellect for both God and man proves vital to his next line of reasoning. In this, he reasons that God exists because he can perceive his existence, having already proven to himself that he can trust his ideas when they are clear and distinct and that he is not being deceived by anything other than his own ignorance. He then allows for trust in intellect and will while accounting for error without doubting God’s ability to create beings, therefore establishing a trust in the divine above his own experiences. As Descartes does not have a full and informed understanding of the mind and body, the similarities and differences he has noticed between himself and God allow him to question if connection and separation of the mind and body is possible, thereby completing his scope of…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cartesian Dualism, a theory coined by Rene Descartes and examined within his sixth mediation of Meditations of First Philosophy, explains and theorizes the idea of the mind and body as two distinct substances. The theory states that the mind is not merely a physical brain as another organ of the body, but rather the non-materialistic mind and material body are two different entities. The body, having elements of extension have a reality with spatial relevance as it entails form, texture, location and weight. In comparison, the mind has non-spatial components that consist of humans’ realm of thought as it includes consciousness, images, emotions beliefs and desires. Cartesian Dualism presents many simple and seemingly rational arguments such…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Skeptics Inception In Descartes Skepticism he excises the idea of doubt and the never ending allurement to some sort of doubt that is within life. Descartes says that everything you know no matter how probable or improbable it is has doubt. In Descartes meditation one and two he goes over his three main points of doubt. First, he wonders if he may be crazy, secondly if he is dreaming and thirdly if he is being tricked.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditation 6, we learn that Descartes comes to the conclusion that the mind and body are two separate entities. His belief is that through the idea that mind and body are separate entities, without the other, one can still exist. He comes to this conclusion by arguing that the mind, a non-extended thinking thing, is an entirely different being than the body, an extended thinking thing, is. He believes that the mind and soul are united to the body but still can be separated from each other and still exist.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Compare and contrast the views of John Searle and Rene Descartes on dualism.is composed of two substances: mind and body. One is physical and one is non-phyical. Rene Descartes views on dualism are known as substance and simple dualism. He believed that reality was composed of two substances, one being the mind which consists of inmaterial thing such as thoughts and emotions.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Descartes leaves many weak spots in his argument, Searle chooses probably the most difficult position to articulate. Searle attempts to explain why Descartes’ argument of mind-body distinction is not really an argument at all and that the two traditional default positions of the argument, materialism and dualism, are not accurate representations as to what the real problem is and should be discarded. Searle’s purpose is to destroy any remaining idea of Cartesian dualism and introduce a much better way of thinking about how humans are, a refutation of the default positions and a transition to a more comprehensive view on the…

    • 1028 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believes that the mind and body are separate because people are a rational thinking thing. One needs to think to exist that was the first certainty Descartes came too. Thinking is what makes us exist and the body is simply an extension to that. The body is unnecessary to exist since a person can exist without a leg or an arm but you cannot deceive existence from thinking. Descartes uses the example of the triangle and in class we modified this to say one can imagine a pink triangle since what makes a triangle a triangle doesn’t depend on the color but you can’t imagine a triangle without three sides because that is what makes it what it is.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes has established his method of doubt in the first meditation. He realizes there were a lot of faults in his previous beliefs. Therefore he seeks a method…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays