Compare And Contrast Socrates And Descartes

Improved Essays
Socrates and Rene Descartes are alike in their most fundamental motives but yet contrasting in results both trying to improve thinking but about two different things. One example would be how they each convey their message formal versus informal, another would be their life style and beliefs of how things should be done. Both Socrates and Descartes have completely different views on getting their desired results, and the level of risk one is willing to take to accomplish certain results. Socrates and Descartes even had vastly different upbringing, and views on which sciences are important and others’ inferior to the rest.
What matters to Descartes is certainty in knowledge, living a food life by religion and bringing religion back into people’s
…show more content…
Socrates defended him self by drawing attention to the fact that he has taught the anyone for many years that would listen with out fee. He even asked the court to excuse his simple mannerisms showing the fact he has never been I trouble with the law, and it was his first time ever being charged with a crime. He talks about how he has never sought public office (power) he talks about how it is society job to influence (work interest of the youth) the youth. He uses an analogy to describe how he is a horse trainer and the youth are horses and how other (society) benefit for his teachings like how to do serein tasks that benefit Athens. Socrates is sentenced to death and given multiple opportunities to escape to another county. He does not run away saying I have lived my whole life in Athens have benefited for it greatly just because I no longer benefit does not mean I can just run away when I no longer favors me. Socrates even uses his last dying breath to show case we wait until the last minuet to tie up loose ends, by asking a friend to pay off some trivial debt. Socrates and Descartes were alike in a bevy of ways, they were both trying to change a way of established thinking, both were trying to get down to what is truth and what is false. Both do have stark differences like Descartes being afraid he would be sentenced to death and Socrates seeing death as liberation. They lived completely different live and in different lifetimes, ones’ mission in life was to improve society the other to build a new house of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to Nicholas of Cusa and Rene Descartes and their ideas of the infinite, the differences are many while the similarities are few. Nicholas of Cusa, who lived from 1401 to 1464, recognized the open-ended, positive aspect of nature which later led him to view the infinite as a never-ending circle; a changing and developing circle that is. In contrast, Rene Descartes, who lived from 1596 to 1650, struggled with trusting whether or not the world even exists outside of the private ego—to him, the two were blended. Descartes, later, came to the conclusion to use his own knowledge in proving certain aspects of the infinite, which would, in a way, strengthen his arguments. Despite their different approaches and ideas, in general, of the infinite, these two philosophers came to find important realizations of human nature and the world around them.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, if he was to leave what example would he be setting to his family and followers. To Socrates he is telling everyone to listen and obey your government no matter what they do because this is right in the eyes if the gods. In closing I feel like it was better for Socrates to escape than to stay in jail and take death, because he was falsely telling his followers to obey the government no matter what they do to you. Like I stated above it is easier to obey than it is to revolt and go against the grain. This to me would have been a correct thing for Socrates to teach.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think Socrates did the right thing by allowing himself to be unjustly executed? Socrates had made an intelligent decision by sacrificing himself to protect the “Social contract” between the state and him, rather than escape from prison to break the rules. Use life to exchange for the preservation of his thought Escape from the prison is equivalent to destruct all of his thought and value what he had constructed during his lifetime. Because leaving Athens is kind of actions to contradict what he taught to his followers, be faithful to the righteousness.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates put himself under the city of Athens by not leaving after so many years, and by doing so, he reaffirmed his acceptance of Athenian system of rules. He further explicated the domino effect fleeing from the verdict would initiate and eventually lead to his soul and conscious being ruined. Socrates would rather die and have a clean conscious than to compromise his principles. He defended and dispensed his principles with valid arguments explaining how simply the act of him escaping from his execution would undermine the…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates defends himself against those charges brought against him Toward as much prosecutor Meletus in two ways. Restricted comprises of a portrayal about Socrates’ inspiration Also method, which he trusts will demonstrate of the jury the reason exactly people, including as much prosecutors, detest him. Those second resistance comprises of socrates reacting straightforwardly to the two charges brought…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Socrates

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To add onto the political sources of tension in Athens that leaded to the trial and conviction of Socrates, another factor that contributed to the trial was the idea of the oligarchs vs. the democrats which Socrates played a major role in. Socrates was known to be a supporter of oligarchy which is a system of government where only the best few rule and made all the decisions for the polis: oligarchs were however unpopular with the polis because it was quite tyrannical and they were more in favour of democracy. An example of where Socrates presents his favour towards oligarchy is revealed when he questions the jurors using an analogy of horses “Do you believe that those who improve them make up the whole of mankind, and that there is only one…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Justification

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Therefore, if Socrates did not escape, he would be doing the…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Essay 3 Given what we know or can safely assume to be true of animal brains and behaviors, do animals actually exhibit thought and reason? The answer depends in large measure on one’s definition of thought and reason. Philosophers René Descartes and David Hume hold conflicting views about the nature and possession of thought and reason and, as a result, offer starkly different arguments for and against the existence of thought and reason in animals. While Descartes maintains in Part Five of Discourse on Method that only humans are capable of conscious thought, Hume asserts that human and animal behaviors are not so different in Section Nine of his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The µῦθος of Theseus and the Minotaur is alluded to near the start of Plato’s Phaedo by the character Phaedo (58 B-C) to initiate a parallel between the µῦθος itself and the teachings of the character Socrates in the pages that follow. As the discussion between Socrates and his companions continues up until his death, this parallel becomes ever more clear, and by the end of the Phaedo it is reasonable to interpret the µῦθος as an analogy for the transition from life to death, where Socrates is counterpart to the Minotaur and the mechanism for his death is analogous to Theseus. With regards to a comparison between Socrates and the Minotaur, this relationship can be perhaps accurately generalized as a comparison between any person and the Minotaur…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction; since the beginning of time mankind has always searched for answers to their ever growing questioning mind. For centuries philosophers have searched on many concepts and have yet to pursue more knowledge about our world, our behavior and the reason behind our existence. Philosophers have embargoed on missions to find the purpose of religion, the concept of government, metaphysics and human mind. For centuries they have examined our world through their critical and analytical thinking and have come with answers for some of our problems. For this assignment I will be comparing and contrasting two gifted philosophers of the world; Socrates and Voltaire.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Annotations Of Socrates

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Additionally, Socrates has a family and a life outside of philosophy and even still he maintains his position towards death upon being convicted; that he will make no judgments on it and will go through with being sentenced if it means there is a chance that in death he can teach again. Philosophy and challenging peoples assumptions is Socrates vocation and something that he is truly passionate about. Socrates, like philosophy, has no biases and does what he does for his own enjoyment and his own personal convictions. Towards the end of his speech, Socrates again reaffirms the importance of himself and others like him to society even though they might view them as an annoyance.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates decided to lash out since he was angered at the court’s reason. “Now I want to prophesy to those who convicted me, for I am at the point when men prophesy most, when they are about to die. I say gentlemen, to those who voted to kill me, that vengeance will come upon you immediately after my death, a vengeance much harder to bear than that which you took in killing me.” Through the trial, debates had broken out that Socrates was corrupting Greece’s youth. After reading Plato’s Dialogue I came to the conclusion that the Greek democratic society was afraid of this new of thought.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction The argument whether or not the mind and the body are distinct substances raises a still on-going debate. In this essay, I proceed to give evidence as to why the Cartesian dualism theory is flawed. First, I am going to introduce a few of Descartes’ arguments and his position on the matter. Then, I will try to pick his most appealing argument and put it up against logical reasoning and other philosophers’ viewpoints. Finally, I am going to conclude how Rene Descartes proposes fallacious arguments which object his mind-body problem.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays