Rene Descartes Dream Argument Analysis

Superior Essays
René Descartes’ dream argument supports his overarching argument for hyperbolic doubt, described in his Meditations on First Philosophy. The dream argument questions one’s perceptions, conscious and unconscious, and how one determines what is true and what is false. He does this by comparing experiences while awake or dreaming. Descartes continues on that since one also cannot tell the difference between what is a dream and what is real life, our perceptions could overall be false, and “assumes dreams are deceptive, first, because they are conscious experiences that are subjectively indistinguishable from standard waking experiences and second, because they involve false beliefs” (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Though the perceptions …show more content…
While one is awake he or she has control over his or her decisions he or she may make throughout each experience, but while dreaming, there is no control in the choices made and the dreamer lacks sense of touch. These signs contradict the second premise that one cannot distinguish between experiences, therefore refuting Descartes’ dream argument. René Descartes was born in France in 1596 to a family of mainly doctors and lawyers. As an adolescent, he obtained a solid background of education in the liberal arts, and later received a degree in civil and canon law. After working on different essays and his methods, he started working on the Meditations on First Philosophy in 1639, and Meditations in its entirety, which is composed of six Meditations, was first published in 1641, and a second edition in 1642 (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Descartes is often …show more content…
And because of this, there is no definite way to distinguish between each of the perceptions. Many other philosophers have studied this premise, including John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. Thomas Hobbes believes that the biggest key to distinguishing a dream from waking consciousness is the “absurdity”. “An absence of absurdity in waking life”, describes how one may realize a perception is a dream through a perception that is extremely abnormal, where he or she is positive that is not occurring in real life (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). For example, if one dreamt of talking to and spending time with a dead relative, he/she knows that is impossible, or in Hobbes’ mind, is “absurd” and therefore distinguishing the difference between dreaming and being awake. John Locke also objected Descartes second premise by pointing out pain in a dream versus pain in real life. He asked Descartes to analyze this difference, and claims “we cannot have physical pain in dreams as we do in waking life”, therefore undermining the premise that the difference in consciousness is indistinguishable (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). While Descartes first premise says that experiences in a dream versus reality are generally similar, experiences involve not only abstract perceptions and sensory touch, and the ability to control one’s experiences.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    When dreaming, our mind believes we are in that situation and it’s surprising when we wake up to realize it was a dream. If dreaming is too hard to understand, there are other ways of thinking about this argument, such as The Matrix and Through the Looking Glass. They all have similar ways of thinking. You may not actually be reading a paper, you may be somewhere else. Until the premises can be proven wrong, this argument stands, as absurd as it may…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dream Argument Descartes

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages

    So dreams falter the true knowledge we obtain through our senses. The argument of lacking trust in senses due to dreams is commonly viewed as an argument from ignorance due to its conclusion having no other evidence than being a possibility. To support labeling the dream argument as an argument of ignorance, I will use Elizabeth Wolgast’s view of knowledge and Barry Stroud’s analysis of the Dream Argument. Wolgast states her view on knowledge in her book Paradoxes of Knowledge. She believes one cannot truly explain how they know something.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosopher Rene Descartes wrote an influential piece named the “Meditations on First Philosophy.” In this work, his “First Meditation” mainly deals with doubt of existence and how doubt is made possible because of sensory deception. He creates the dream argument that argues about how it is possible to be uncertain about whether or not a person is in a real world or dream world. In philosopher G.E. Moore’s “Certainty” he attempts to debunk Descartes’ argument through showing the inconsistencies in his dream argument. Since Descartes’ argument is built on inconsistency, Moore’s replies are satisfactory.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On this premise Descartes explains this to be the reason why it is so difficult to differentiate a dream from being awake. Furthermore, Descartes explains since the senses can be deceived the senses and assumptions made under the justification of the senses. Some may argue since two worlds exist, as in the Matrix, humans could not possibly differentiate the perceptions conceived in each respective world. Yet, this opposition only supports Descartes’s views since Descartes himself explains how the same relationship is shared between the perceptions drawn while sleeping and being…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Kendra Cherry’s article titled Dream Interpretation: What Do Dreams Mean she explores the varying theories behind what meanings dreams could possibly have and their interpretation according to experts in the field of psychology and cognitive studies. Cherry being a psychologist, supports the theory that it is likely dreams have a subconscious meaning. Many people share the belief their dreams have some sort of unknown meaning or an underlying message while others are skeptical. Some claim dreams are simply random images and situations serving no importance to the dreamer. Because dreams can be outlandish and unexplainable it serves as reason to believe dreams are random and meaningless.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first being that you cannot trust authorities as they disagree amongst themselves and have differing theories and ideas and therefore they cannot be passing on certain truths as they would agree if that was the case. The mistrust of the senses is the basis of what will become Descartes’ dreaming argument, this is the idea that you cannot at any time trust your senses as they deceive us regularly in the form of things that are far away or too close being easily misinterpreted (Feinberg and Shafer-Landau, 2015). From this Descartes introduces his dreaming argument. He begins by discussing that there are times when he believes he is sat awake in front of his fire when he is actually asleep in his bed; he tries to explain this by stating that he may be like an insane person who claims they are dressed a certain way when they are in fact not dressed at all before quickly dismissing this idea. He then introduces the idea that dreaming is a more believable explanation.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, are ideas real? And secondly, how does reality become separate from a dream, if at all? By referring back to Descartes and the theories of empiricism and rationalism, a common point of view is one in which ideas, being thoughts cannot be doubted. In regards to the second question, it is understood that unless in a state of lucidness (being aware of dreaming while dreaming), it is impossible for a dreamer to differentiate a dream from real life while in a dream. In reference to personal dreams, I have observed that it is almost impossible for one to recognise that the ‘reality’ created during a dream is in fact a dream.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Donald Davidson and John McDowell both present responses to skepticism of the external world. Skepticism of the external world arises from the realization that our perceptions are fallible and that there is no real justification for believing that an external world exists over believing that we are all just in a dream. Davidson presents a coherence theory as a response to skepticism, stating that a belief about the external world, in this case, is most likely true if it is not contradictory with a significant body of beliefs (Davidson 307). McDowell criticizes Davidson’s theory and presents a new theory that says experience has conceptual content, and therefore can serve as justification for our beliefs (McDowell 26). There are many issues…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Latent dream-thoughts consist of the hidden meaning of an individual’s unconscious thoughts, wishes, and desires. The unconscious psyche represses the latent content in order to protect the ego from primitive thoughts or feelings that are difficult to cope with on a conscious level. By analyzing the seemingly bizarre and unrelated manifest content of the dream, individuals can uncover the meaning of deeper underlying issues…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to consider the epistemological dilemma presented by Descartes, one must examine the epistemological thought from which he extrapolates: empiricism. In empiricism, empiricist claim that everything encountered through the senses is knowledge. Yet, this claim is problematic for empiricist, as there is no clear justification of basic empirical knowledge. Correspondingly, Descartes furthers the issue of empirical knowledge; he denies humankind’s ability to decipher awakened-ness from dreaming. Descartes’ concern with determining dream perception versus reality perception is vexing, but appropriate.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays