In this exchange, the teacher is considered the most important part of the learning process. The student is merely a container that is filled with deposits of information. The dynamic in their relationship is that the teacher knows everything and the student knows nothing (Freire, 2005). Freire believes this process is oppressive to the student because it does not allow for creativity. To the contrary, Eisner (2003) believes that teachers should be engaged in both practical and artistic activities as they teach their student; thereby enhancing students' creative skills, rather than just implementing researched material. According to Eisner (2003), students learn at an early age to respond to this type of engagement and the outcome enables students to be productive in society. This belief is in direct contrast to Freire’s thoughts on the role of the educator and
In this exchange, the teacher is considered the most important part of the learning process. The student is merely a container that is filled with deposits of information. The dynamic in their relationship is that the teacher knows everything and the student knows nothing (Freire, 2005). Freire believes this process is oppressive to the student because it does not allow for creativity. To the contrary, Eisner (2003) believes that teachers should be engaged in both practical and artistic activities as they teach their student; thereby enhancing students' creative skills, rather than just implementing researched material. According to Eisner (2003), students learn at an early age to respond to this type of engagement and the outcome enables students to be productive in society. This belief is in direct contrast to Freire’s thoughts on the role of the educator and