According to the "The Banking Concept of Education" by Paulo Freire, I believe that Freire does a good job of showing the reader his idea about education. He makes the reader think about him/herself by the way he shows the fact obvious in their life. He hopes the reader know the depth of difference between the banking system and the problem-posing system. Therefore, this essay is talking about learning can only be achieved by communication with others and such type of learning cannot be achieved through the banking concept. He describes, “Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor” (Friera, 257). He thinks that the banking concept as narration because the teacher
…show more content…
He shows the reader the current situation, how students are ridden of their true education and forced to accept the concepts of the teacher and the teacher only, where there is no thinking allowed for the students, and their imagination is slowly sucked out of their brains. That makes students never think critically or develop ideas and then the banking education will prevent the students' creativity. Therefore, The banking concept of education should be excluded. Instead of that, he presents the problem-posing education the place that teacher give the questions to the students and then the students have a process of discovery and discuss with classmates. The students learn from the teachers and opposite the teachers learn from the students. Besides, He states, “Education must begin with the solution of the teacher-student contradiction, by reconciling the poles of the contradiction so that both are simultaneously teachers and students” (Freire, 257). This mean "reflection" is a positive way because it helps both students and teachers learning from one another. In conclusion, he argues that the real form of education is one in which communication and understanding what are pertinent. And then, this teaching style will be more valuable for …show more content…
First, about the ethos in his essay contributes to persuading the reader by his credibility. Because Freire is who is “one of the most influential radical educators of our world”( Freire 242). Besides, he used to teach illiterate adults how to read and write by overall providing information to those who struggle receiving or understanding complex thoughts in a way that can be applied. In addition, he mentions his meeting that he had in Chile where he discussed the banking concept of education with others. That creates the reader more believe about him. Secondly, throughout the essay, Freire uses of pathos by comparing the banking concept of education with problem-posing education. For instance, when Freire describes the banking concept of education and the problem-posing education, Freire uses words that have a negative connotation such as forces, oppressed, inhibits and he compares the students in a banking system to "containers or receptacles to be filled by the teacher" (Freire, 244).His purpose is that create a reader negatively thinking about banking concept because this education style inhibits creativity and not positive aspects of good education. That's why the students who are subjected to domination should fight to emancipate. It's not the author emotion, but also create the reader feeling the students in banking education don't have free-will.
He shows the reader the current situation, how students are ridden of their true education and forced to accept the concepts of the teacher and the teacher only, where there is no thinking allowed for the students, and their imagination is slowly sucked out of their brains. That makes students never think critically or develop ideas and then the banking education will prevent the students' creativity. Therefore, The banking concept of education should be excluded. Instead of that, he presents the problem-posing education the place that teacher give the questions to the students and then the students have a process of discovery and discuss with classmates. The students learn from the teachers and opposite the teachers learn from the students. Besides, He states, “Education must begin with the solution of the teacher-student contradiction, by reconciling the poles of the contradiction so that both are simultaneously teachers and students” (Freire, 257). This mean "reflection" is a positive way because it helps both students and teachers learning from one another. In conclusion, he argues that the real form of education is one in which communication and understanding what are pertinent. And then, this teaching style will be more valuable for …show more content…
First, about the ethos in his essay contributes to persuading the reader by his credibility. Because Freire is who is “one of the most influential radical educators of our world”( Freire 242). Besides, he used to teach illiterate adults how to read and write by overall providing information to those who struggle receiving or understanding complex thoughts in a way that can be applied. In addition, he mentions his meeting that he had in Chile where he discussed the banking concept of education with others. That creates the reader more believe about him. Secondly, throughout the essay, Freire uses of pathos by comparing the banking concept of education with problem-posing education. For instance, when Freire describes the banking concept of education and the problem-posing education, Freire uses words that have a negative connotation such as forces, oppressed, inhibits and he compares the students in a banking system to "containers or receptacles to be filled by the teacher" (Freire, 244).His purpose is that create a reader negatively thinking about banking concept because this education style inhibits creativity and not positive aspects of good education. That's why the students who are subjected to domination should fight to emancipate. It's not the author emotion, but also create the reader feeling the students in banking education don't have free-will.