The only ones not cashing in, it seems, are the player themselves. " This does not seem fair that the ones who are making the money are not receiving any of the money. Greg Johnson, sports editor at The Daily Targum, and StudentNation, organization who give first-person accounts from student activists, organizers and journalists reporting on youth-oriented movements for social justice, economic equality and tolerance, says, "Coaches and athletic directors can negotiate million-dollar contracts, billions are available for installing state-of-the-art facilities, but the whole enterprise hinges on maintaining an arbitrary benefit to the student athletes. " Supporters of the notion that college athletes should not be paid argue that there are problems with payment. Johnson, who spent sixteen years working in the School of Sport Sciences at Wingate University (NC), and Acquaviva, professor of sports science at Wingate University (NC) say that refuters ask the questions "how much should the athletes get paid and will payments be based on performance?…
An university can increase their profit by increasing concession prices, such as tickets and merchandise, or by lowering expenses. Two expenses Tubby Smith suggests that could be lowered are the investments of training facilities and coach’s contracts. He argues that coaches are overpaid to the point that they should not being the highest paid person in his/her respective state. Smith also suggests college sports programs invest an abundance of money in training facilities. Although he highlights valid points to lower the cost of funding an athletic program, these points would hinder the overall viability of the program.…
In 2012, there was a poll ran to see how many college coaches think that their players should be paid to play. 58% of those coaches agree that they should get paid. Also in 2012, there was another poll ran to see how fans felt about this subject. Only 27% thought that they should be paid and then 5% of them said that they shouldn’t get any scholarships or compensation. I agree that collegiate athletes should not get compensated for going to college to play sports.…
Due to NCAA rules, athletes have not been allowed compensation for their participation in college athletics. This rule has caused a great divide and debate within the collegiate sport world, especially with the recent exponential growth of college athletics. For instance, college sports critics Val Ackerman and Larry Scott argue “that college is ultimately about getting a degree and getting ready for life long after their playing days are over” supporting their claim that college athletes should not be paid (Ackerman and Scott). Opposing that view is the idea that college athletics offer exactly those benefits and more, which would be maximized with payment. As of right now, college athletes are being compensated through scholarships that average…
Imagine that you just scored the game-winning touchdown in the NCAA football championship. Your touchdown just helped your school get millions of dollars if not more. Now, do you think that you should get a share of that money? The National Collegiate Athletic Association or commonly known as the NCAA is the governing body of college sports. Student athletes have an “amateur” status which means that the only benefits they receive are educational.…
A main argument in Collegiate level sports is if the student athletes should receive pay or not. Former athletes may argue that a student playing a sport at a university should be paid; some spectators do not see pay for college athletes is a necessity needed. For some athletes tuition, room and board, and book expenses are covered through a full athletic scholarship, and these scholarships are still more than what academic students can receive (Block). What more could the athletes possibly want from the university? The athletes are being noticed throughout the whole country on Entertainment and Sports Programming Network (ESPN) channels, isn’t the publicity enough plus earning a free college degree?…
This is crazy because all these players get so many extra things provided to them already so why should they need to get paid. If they want to get paid they should work hard and make it to the pros. If the athletes that play college sports were to get paid those schools would lose a lot of money because it would be way too expensive to pay all of these athletes. You have to keep in mind that they already have to pay the coaches and teachers let alone athletes. From another aspect of looking at if college athletes should be paid or not is that it would take away how the players play the game.…
Over the past couple decades, college athletics have increased their popularity tremendously. The increase in popularity has led to a surplus of revenue brought to each of the Universities and the National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA). Last year Oregon had a revenue of $196,030,398 and not a single player was compensated for the work they did on those sports teams (Berkowitz para. 1).…
Argumentative Research Paper Outline College athletes should not complain about not getting paid, they should be offered the option of a tuition or a salary. Not Both. People think that they should get paid because they are in college sports now. (Jones)…
What is the major issue with collegiate sports? Most Americans would condemn college athletes for the negative connotations that people associate with college sports. However, the real issue is the NCAA circumventing any charges for the illegal trusts they have developed. The NCAA’s no-pay rule creates both an unlawful form of wage fixing and a felonious group boycott and therefore should be revoked. College athletes bring billions of dollars to the NCAA each year, making the NCAA one of the wealthiest businesses in America.…
Thomas Morley Prof Mitra English 097 12 December 2016 The Pay of College Athletes Are athletes more important than the regular students at big schools? What makes athletes believe they should be paid? Why should a college athlete get paid if they don’t pay for school?…
The NCAA should not pay the athletes Michael Jordan one of the greatest basketball players of all time, was never paid when he played at North Carolina. Other greats like Larry Bird were never paid in college either. If all time greats like Bird and Jordan were never paid, why should the less talented get paid? Jordan and Bird are not the only famous college athletes that were not paid, there are many other greats that include: Magic Johnson, Christian Laettner, Bo Jackson, Lou Gehrig, and many more. If college athletes were paid salaries they would think they were better than what they really are.…
The controversy of whether college athletes should be paid or not is a significant issue in the sports world, today. In this issue there are two different sides the NCAA and then their college athletes. The main reason the NCAA states they will not pay their college athletes is because they are ‘amateurs’. According to the NCAA, “Amateur competition is a bedrock principle of college athletics and the NCAA.…
Now how many of you who raised your hand think it’s fair for all the athletes in this room to be paid a salary on top of receiving an athletic scholarship and academic scholarship? The topic of student athlete’s being paid has been debated about for many years. II.…
This results in many people trying to sue the NCAA because they believe this isn’t fair but that is another discussion. College athletes deserve to be paid based on all they do for their university. Works Cited Edwards, Harry. “Share the Wealth” 16 December 2011. Web.…