College Athletes Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
Student Compensation
A big star in college and an icon during the years of the "Fab Five" superstar power forward Chris Webber was walking with a friend and asked to borrow gas money when he saw a Michigan jersey with his name and number on it selling for $75 and said to his friend "That money is going to go to someone somewhere but I have to beg for food and gas money" he declared for the NBA draft the following week. This isn't the only instance where a very popular college athlete feels they should receive money if merchandise with their name on it is being advertised for purchase. The NCAA has been an amateur association since it's creation. It wasn't the hottest conversation to talk about paying college athletes but many people nowadays
…show more content…
First, many D1 colleges receive millions of dollars each year in revenue thanks to their athletes. "College basketball players receive nothing from the 8.8 billion NCAA tournament television contract. College football players must toil voluntarily for coaches like UCLA's Jim Mora". (Plaschke) This example suggests even though the athletes are the reason for most of the revenue, they aren't paid a dime of it. Furthermore, only few college athletes receive college scholarships. "To go along with their $40,000-$50,000 scholarships, basically free education, athletes enjoy luxury and academic services that ordinary students can’t obtain let alone afford". (Chudacoff) This evidence shows certainly the athletes that get division one scholarships have more luxuries than a regular student would. Yet, the NCCA proclaims to be an amateur association but doesn’t go by to a single definition of amateurism. There are many supporters of student compensation. To begin, a lot of people think these student athletes are doing a lot of hard work for others and aren’t getting any benefit from the hard work themselves. “A Musician can receive money for a gig & a biologist can be compensated for their research. But scholarship athletes can’t get paid to shine with their skills, and their earnings at any part time jobs are capped”. (Plaschke) Basically saying other students can make money off of their hard …show more content…
Those players should be compensated for their hard work especially when their names and likenesses are used in merchandise licensed by the NCAA, such as video games”. (Paying College Athletes) This example is stating that the NCAA makes hundreds of millions in profit and none of it goes to the athletes producing that profit. Furthermore, some people even think ultimately sports are more important than education.” College athletes receive more than benefits than the average American makes in a year income.” (Ackerman and Val) This explains how even people who go on to graduate and they might have spent 4 or 10 years in college, a student athlete with a scholarship most likely receives more in benefits than that graduated student in a year’s pay. There are also many critics and people against student compensation. They argue education is very important. “College is ultimately about getting a degree and getting ready for life long after their college sports days are over.” (Ackerman and Val) This example explains how the reason many students go to college is to study and get their degree for a real life job because not everyone will

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    John R. Thelin, a professor at the University of Kentucky, wrote an article for Time.com titled “Here’s Why We Shouldn’t Pay College Athletes”. Throughout the article, Thelin refers to athletes strictly a part of college men’s football and basketball and explains why replacing a full-ride scholarship which amounts to 65,000 dollars with a 100,000-dollar salary does not make sense economically. Thelin also highlights the difference in state taxes which may make some colleges more appealing than others due to the benefits of keeping more of the theoretical 100,000-dollar salary. I believe that Thelin in his article is making a valid point that students should not be paid as employees of the university in which they attend, and that a 100,000-dollar scholarship should not replace a full-ride scholarship. However, in this article, Thelin is putting the readers under the impression that all college athletes are under full-ride scholarships.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On College Athletes

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Due to the increasing popularity of college sports in the United States, individuals have begun to question whether college athletes should be paid like professionals. But college athletes are students and amateur players, meaning that college athletes are not given money to play a sport. Student-athletes attend college to get an education, not to be paid to play a sport. Already compensating athletes for playing are scholarships. Also, paying athletes would cause countless problems.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although many athletes are given scholarships, they still can fall in debt to other things such as books, living, and extras. Meshefijian stated, “In the past twelve years, the amount of money generated by sports has increased nearly 300%” (par. 3). Student athletes lose the opportunity to have a job for a majority of their time because they are preoccupied by games, practices, conditioning, and on top of that they must also be a full time student and maintain a GPA that keeps them eligible to participate in their sport. College scholarships can only support a student for so much. Earning a salary would substitute the money they would be earning if they were able to have a job.…

    • 1767 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to NCAA rules, athletes have not been allowed compensation for their participation in college athletics. This rule has caused a great divide and debate within the collegiate sport world, especially with the recent exponential growth of college athletics. For instance, college sports critics Val Ackerman and Larry Scott argue “that college is ultimately about getting a degree and getting ready for life long after their playing days are over” supporting their claim that college athletes should not be paid (Ackerman and Scott). Opposing that view is the idea that college athletics offer exactly those benefits and more, which would be maximized with payment. As of right now, college athletes are being compensated through scholarships that average…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Paid Student Athletes

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages

    69% of student athletes believe they should be compensated by universities for the amount of money they bring in. With over half of both players and coaches believing in payment for the athletes, it makes one wonder why the NCAA has not changed the rule yet. There are many college football coaches currently making more than professional football coaches. For example, Nick Saban is currently making $7,000,000 a year (Goldman, Lee). This is more than 27 NFL coaches are paid, showing how lucrative the monopoly, that is college sports, is.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Collegiate Athletes Should Not Be Paid The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletics Association) is a not-for profit organization, bringing in $912 million in revenue in 2015, nearly a billion dollars and has deals worth multi billion dollars with its broadcasting partners, Turner/CBS. These astronomical profits are what is leading some to call for collegiate athletes to be paid for their services for their collegiate teams in NCAA tournaments, the proponents of pay-for-play believe that players should be getting a piece of the pie as they are the main reason for why the NCAA is bringing in close to a billion dollars in revenue, most of it coming from broadcasting deals. The principle argument in favor of paying college athletes for representing…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The NCAA is a billion dollar organization. Out of all the money generated from tickets, jerseys, fan apparel, and lucrative contracts,deals the NCAA doesn't spread any of the wealth to any of the college athletes. “Then there’s March Madness on CBS and its neat $1-million-per-commercial rates for the Final Four”(204). And yet the college athletes receive no pay. Most athletes are awarded a scholarship for their…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, that might not happen if athletes start to get paid. Money could influence their choice. For example: Paying student-athletes any more than a scholarship would put such considerations in jeopardy, resulting in students making decisions based on how much money they are offered, as opposed to making decisions based on where they will succeed in all aspects of college life. (Meshefejian)…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people have recently raised controversy on the subject of whether college athletes should be paid or not. The student athletes feel they should be paid for their performance on the field due to the fact that they spend most of their free time on the field or court practicing the sport they love and they cannot afford to manage school, sports, and a healthy sleep life style on top of working to be able to afford things. College athletes should not be paid for their performance on the field. The student athletes should not be paid to play because they are in school for education, this could cause issues for colleges with auctioning, this can cause money problems for the student athletes, and sports are not a job they are a choice. Student…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    College athletes provide entertainment for their school and millions of other people, but they are still not getting paid for their extreme work ethic, their commitment to their sport or school and most importantly, because of the amount of money they help the school to make. The NCAA makes billions of dollars each year because of the ability of their players to entertain a crowd. Even with all of this money coming in they still don’t have to pay their players. So essentially they have built a business system that generates billions each year off of the hard work of these players and they don’t have to pay them for it. Most…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) gets a cut; universities get a cut; coaches get a cut. The only ones not cashing in, it seems, are the players themselves. Under NCAA rules, they’ve been considered “amateurs” who aren’t allowed to profit from their sports" (Majerol 1). As for college athletes, they get a free education which is great and all but is it equal? Many college coaches get paid like pro coaches, so why should the athletes get the same? "…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the NCAA raking in on average $12 billion in revenues annually that flow in through college athletics programs, the actual athletes deserve some type of benefits other than leaving college breaking even because they don 't have to pay tuition. They need to be able to save up some money for when they depart from college to get their working life started. They put the same amount of time as people that work full time jobs, working 40 hours a week or sometimes even more. They put their bodies through so much having to deal with the workout programs to stay strong and the dieting programs to keep them fit and able to compete at the best of their ability. As stated in “When 's Payday for collegians?”, we should envision an arrangement where students-athletes receive labor law protections, competitive compensation, and more through medical coverage(Sanderson 2015).…

    • 1336 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Universities sell jerseys and other merchandise with the likeness of athletes, and profit from the sales, yet athletes cannot receive any money in return. The recent court case concerning EA Sports and its use of the numbers and positions of college athletes in video games while the actual athletes receives nothing in return is unacceptable. These are both examples of student-athletes being taken advantage of so that the NCAA and other companies can make more money. Coaches and other adults involved in the athletic department of universities are paid millions, while the true moneymakers (athletes) are not actually paid anything. While some of the players struggle to pay for food and find a place to live outside of the college campus, coaches are well paid and live in relative comfort.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should college athletes be paid for playing? No, they should not because they are already getting scholarships, the colleges might not be able to afford to pay them, and because playing the sport is not a job. Athletes are already getting scholarships, do they really need or deserve to get paid as well? They only play for one season a year, but the scholarships help them all year round, so why do they deserve even more money during the season. Besides, they are not only getting to play a sport they probably really enjoy, but they also get to travel free around the country, be on TV regularly, and maybe even get looked at by professional sports teams.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Universities and Colleges recruit the athletes, imposing them to operate with a multi-billion-dollar industry regulating them and making a huge revenue of their exposers. The universities offer full-ride scholarships, and free education, which is a huge opportunity, and invaluable experience that many Americans are not able to afford. But looking at all the television revenue, tickets, jersey sales and other product sold, the comparison is incomparable. The athletes despite devoting 40 hours a week practicing, leaving them with little time to place towards academics, the division I athletes are not considered as employees, the source of income go to the NCAA and members that are involved in the business such as the coaches and the staff. Basically, the student athletes are exploited by the NCAA and universities for they athletics skills with no source of income, they are just given the opportunity to get free education, but do the amount of devotion towards their sport they cannot fully dedicate their time towards education.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays