Pro Capital Punishment Research Paper

Good Essays
Some people say that crime keeps going up. Others say that it is going down as time goes on. Either way, some people feel that capital punishment is a deterrent of crime. Others feel that the death penalty is inhumane and a cruel and unusual punishment that will never be appropriate, no matter what the crime was. People who are pro-capital punishment theorize that a person is less likely to commit a crime because they do not want to die at the hands of the government. People saying the opposite, however, believe that no matter what, capital punishment will not deter crime. Their reasoning is something along the lines of “an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind”, meaning that they do not believe that a person should be killed because …show more content…
While the justice system tries its best to find the right people who committed a crime, it is made up of humans who can and will make mistakes. Because of this, people who are actually innocent can be determined guilty. If they are sentenced to the death penalty (and the state goes through with it) and new evidence (or even old evidence) shows that they are actually innocent, they cannot bring that person back to life. If they are sentenced to life in prison, however, and they are found to be not guilty, they are able to be released from prison. It is not an ideal situation but it is better than dying for a crime that a person did not commit. Also, if the person was framed for the crime they are able to move on with their life from prison when they are found not guilty.
While there are a few pros on what capital punishment can do, such as the ultimate punishment to the worst criminals to being more cost effective, many studies show that it does not deter crime. The inmates who committed the crime would have still committed the crime due to various reasons, from the heat of passion to being under the influence of drugs and alcohol. Because of this and the fact that a person may be innocent, capital punishment just seems like a cruel and unusual punishment that does not help with the crime

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    They seem to believe in an eye for an eye justice. However, in my opinion, killing people can never be a humane act. Besides this, it is not always certain that all the convicted criminals are actually guilty. Some innocent people might get executed for the crimes they never did due to lack of proper evidences. If life imprisonment is practiced instead of the death penalty, such innocent people can be freed whenever their innocence is…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is thought that the death penalty is a good way to deter others from committing similar crimes because if they see that a person is sentenced to death they will not want the same out come, resulting in the person not committing the crime. This idea is not proven but is a concept that many people stand behind, for example Ernest van den Haag believes that the death penalty is still justified in use even if the evidence is inconclusive because it is the only possible deterrent. Van den Haag has three arguments that he uses to back his views on the death penalty being used as a deterrent. His three arguments are: The common sense argument, the outcome argument, and the death penalty as only possible…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He stands firm on his first argument, saying that the death penalty is not only the best but the only deterrent to crime. Ernest says the objection of life imprisonment is a light slap on the wrist and is not geared enough. Imprisonment only gives murderers more time to plot and scheme it does not change other criminal minds about making the same mistake. Some opponents of Haag stand argue that people have a right to life and morally we should not use capital punishment. An objection that Haag uses is that the right to life is forfeited if the crime that is broken is severe enough.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Over time, punishment has changed, and society’s views have as well. Capital punishment has been a largely debatable subject over the past decades, but the government still chooses to keep this punishment. Although the death penalty should be viewed as a good way to keep murderers behind bars, this punishment can send an innocent person to death row for a crime they did not commit, and in cases, there are problems of people being subjective, such as having discrimination. Capital punishment is a place for justice. People say this punishment is for those who have created barbaric crimes.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Maybe more death penalty campaign will decrease the crime. Some of people do serious crime because they thought no one will caught them this mind set give them the courage to do crime scene. This problem still can’t be solve until now because it human behaviour. Capital punishment can make a person think twice before doing crime but it doesn’t totally avoid them to do…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For some, however, they will feel remorse immediately, whereas to others, they will feel regretful at a later time. Despite the notion that habitual criminals only commit crimes because they are caught in the heat of the moment , the truth is, the death penalty plays a role in whether or not one has the ability to go above and beyond to commit premeditated murder. Thanks to the death penalty, more criminals are reconsidering their ability to kill innocent people execution style while they are committing robberies, for example, in places like banks and department stores with fear they will receive the death penalty in the foreseeing future (Gerber, 2014). Not knowing what the death penalty consist of with regards to the sentencing would inflict less fear than if they face the consequences. In this case, many habitual criminals…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some people see it as an eye for an eye type of ordeal, while others see it as legal murder. According to Steven Goldberg (1974), “one who supports capital punishment can foreclose further discussion by asserting that an eye must be taken for an eye, even if the taking of an eye does not deter anyone any more than would a lesser penalty.” Some people believe that having the death penalty creates a safer environment. Edwin R. Keedy (1912) believes that having the death penalty in places prevents some of these awful criminals from taking their bad behavior even further and taking someone’s life. According to Roger Hood (2016), the death penalty is not any more of a deterrent than life…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I know money is a big issue but just because shame punishment is a cheaper alternative to incarceration doesn’t make it right for the people who have done non-violent crimes. Shame punishment is cruel and it will not help an offender change. It would discourage them and make them feel like a bad person for what they have done. I, personally think that judges should not give our shame punishment because of the consequences that can occur. I agree with Tangney that community service can really help a…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Attorneys state that capital punishment is not justified for humans, even though it is. Capital punishment is a better choice than receiving a life sentence in prison. Although the death penalty can be looked at as a gruesome act, it’s simply an experiment that has been proven successful. While those opposed might say that it’s an experiment that never should’ve happened, that is not so. The courts are stating that if criminals are convicted of life, they will learn their lesson, but this isn’t always the case.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Van den Haag wrote that people who are faced life imprisonment or death penalty, people would choose life in imprisonment. Statistics have failed to show how effectiveness of death penalty has deterred. One of the four which Reiman uses in his argument is that unless there is conclusive evidence that capital punishment “deters everyone who can be deterred” that there is chance that both can be the same. Since statistics can be skewed or falsely misrepresented of the actual facts of the topic. As human being there is an element to consider which is survival instinct, for capital punishment can persuade individuals from conducting sinister actions or activities that may end innocent lives.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics