Argument In Favor Of Animal Testing

Good Essays
Animal Testing
Ranim Habbal

“I am in favor of animal rights as well as human rights. That’s is the way of a whole human being.” Abraham Lincoln. Animal testing is a very controversial issue. Fellenz (2005) said that using animals is not a new activity that humans invented lately, but it is an old method ancient people used to do to learn about nature. Further, people used to kill animals for food; therefore, they learned anatomy and physiology. During the Roman era, people begun to dissect animals. Then, in the modern era, scientists relied on animals to invent and make drugs and vaccines. Nevertheless, these days we also use animals for verity of things, such as, medicines, artificial body parts, vaccines, and “surgical techniques.” Many countries use animals to examine the safety of drugs, for example, in the U.S. all new drugs have to be tested on animals because the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires so. Since drugs are tested on animals, scientists and pharmacists can insure that these drugs are safe for testing on humans, and then giving it to patients (Fellenze, 2005). However, people are split into two parties for this particular issue, and one party supports using animals, but the other party against using animals in any way, yet using animals is important for humans, but there should be restricted regulations to use them.
Animal
…show more content…
That's how you'd want it, because new drugs are dangerous, and while we don't want animals to suffer it's preferable to accidentally killing humans with untested chemicals. Animalresearch.info has a list of all the diseases for which we now have treatments thanks, in part, to animal testing: from Aids to whooping cough, the safety of new treatments was first assessed through testing them on animals (Chivers,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    If these companies do feel the need to test their products they turn to other alternatives of testing before using animals (Keville). Also, plenty of these companies that test on animals claim to do it because there are requirement laws for it in other countries that they sell to (“About Cosmetic Testing”); if this is the case then these companies shouldn 't sell to those countries till new laws are passed. So on, there is no necessity to use animals for cosmetics testing, making it unethical and cruel to the animals. There should be more laws on testing on animals in the basis of cosmetics, but separate from…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    (Safety and Testing 2). The next test is the repeat-dose toxicity testing, and this test gives the researchers an idea of how they react in the body. The organs in the animals are studied for toxic effects. This is important because it shows which drugs are toxic and what drugs are not. Animals are very important in these tests because the animal could determine if the drug gets to the market.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some people might say that testing on humans is not an option, so they test on animals instead, however research shows that before a product is released for sale it is tested on a human. There are micro brains that scientists have developed that can also be used for the purpose to retrieve results. “The organs have potential to help model neural problems in their earliest form to test the safety of drugs” (Verger 2013). The micro brains are used to test on drugs meaning it’s another way to test if certain drugs are safe, they test drugs such as tobacco, and vaccines on animals which can be prevented if they use micro brains more often. Human tissue, once developed and integrated, researchers can use these models to predict whether a candidate drug, vaccine or biologic agent is safe or toxic in humans in a faster and more cost-effective way than current methods.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The reaction of the humans to the drugs that are used for the animal experiment can differ from the reaction of the animals, which means that animals fail to be used as a method of developing the technique of humans' medical treatment. Moreover, there are numerous alternative methods which are proved to be more efficient than animal experimentation. Therefore, humans cannot use animals arbitrarily and try to minimize the use of animal for their own benefits. Now, it is the time for people to respect animals’ rights and find other ways instead of doing animal experimentation. People should not be selfish anymore and treat animals with…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As how people think, animal testing is the best way to find information, animal testing should be banned and here is why. While animals are getting tested to find research for humans the animals are being harmed by the chemicals the scientists are using and the animals are getting hurt even if the research or treatment the scientists come out with does not necessarily approve with a human body. PETA states, " The Food administration reports that 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass on animal tests fail in humans." (PETA). This shows that getting research from animals for humans is not always approved by the human body, even if scientists say that animals have the same traits as humans.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Others like the animal welfare doesn’t oppose to all in vivo research using animals, they stand against inhumane and unnecessary use of animals and fight to eliminate the pain and suffering of animals for cosmetics purposes. Even though both scientists and Animal right Activist believe that experience can cause distress in animals, scientist argue that they understand that distress in animals, can seriously affect the results of the study. Hence most research do not involve painful procedures or the pain is alleviated with analgesic or anesthetic drugs. In other words They claim that experiments are designed to minimize the suffering of animal. With all these controversies surrounding this issue, Animal testing…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “Animal Testing is Bad Science Point/Counterpoint” by PETA says, “We can now test skin irritation using reconstructed human tissue (e.g., MatTeks EpiDerm), produce and test vaccines using human tissues, and perform pregnancy tests using blood samples instead of killing rabbits.” This suggests that with new technologies, we can save animals’ lives. Animals are also inhabitants on earth, they were here first, and we have to protect them, not kill them. Also, “Saving the Animals: New Ways to Test Products” by The New York Times says, “Human skin, eyes, and the lining of the throat—snippets of these and other tissues are now routinely grown in test tubes from donated human cells. The goal is not to patch up ailing people but to use the human tissues in place of mice, dogs, or other lab animals for testing new drugs, cosmetics and other products.” Animal testing may soon be coming to an end. Other technologies are taking the place of animal testing because millions of animals are killed every year, and the things tested on them that were safe, were not safe for humans.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Groups such as PETA have taken a stand against animal testing with the use of violence, while groups like the Humane Society reject animal research in a more peaceful manner. Today, the government relies on animal testing for the drugs and vaccines used on humans, and “to meet US and EU regulations, medicines must be successfully treated in two species of animals before moving to human clinical trials” (Experimenting). Europe and the United States trust the results of animal testing enough to make it mandatory for all vaccines. The two governments use animals as a precaution to lessen the number of human illnesses and fatalities during human clinical trials, which saves time and resources for the medical world and the consumers. The medical industry recognizes the benefits of animal research by “rewarding about two-thirds of the Nobel Prizes in physiology or medicine to researchers who made medical advancements through the use of animal experimentation” (Hile 72).…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal Testing Controversy

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Without animal research doctors would be at a great disadvantage, possibly even in the dark, about many of the types of diseases that can spread on to humans. With that being said, the total riddance of animal testing will set back the development of crucial medical devices, medicines, and treatment (Hajar). Those who support this idea that animals are vital to medical advancement point to the American Welfare Act’s strict controls about the use of animal testing, particularly regarding potential pain. As stated in the above paragraphs, the act regulates the alleviation and elimination of pain. In section 12 of this act, it states “the Secretary is authorized to promulgate humane standards and recordkeeping requirements governing the purchase, handling, or sale of dogs or cats by dealers or research facilities at auction sales” (Public).…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal Testing Research

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Author Reisinger (2015) agrees to those who support animal testing method because cosmetic industry needs animal testing method in order to prove that their products are safe to use. Those who support animal testing method do agrees that it is crucial to test on living animals; however, they believe that because there has been dreadful results of substitute method for animal testing products must be tested. According to Reisinger, “with one exception, all test methods (that could substitute animal testing) misclassified a maximum of two substance” which leads to failure to skin sensitization test. Skin sensitization test is very important to pass for cosmetic product since all cosmetic product especially foundation directly get applied to skin (Reisinger, K., Hoffmann, S., Alépée, N., Ashikaga, T., Barroso, J., Elcombe, C., & ... Martinozzi-Teissier, S. 2015). Reasons for failure to those substitute method is not clear “but are most likely due to differences in the test method protocols such as cells or prediction models used” Reisinger, K., Hoffmann, S., Alépée, N., Ashikaga, T., Barroso, J., Elcombe, C., & ... Martinozzi-Teissier, S. 2015).…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays