Argument In Favor Of Animal Testing

Improved Essays
Animal Testing
Ranim Habbal

“I am in favor of animal rights as well as human rights. That’s is the way of a whole human being.” Abraham Lincoln. Animal testing is a very controversial issue. Fellenz (2005) said that using animals is not a new activity that humans invented lately, but it is an old method ancient people used to do to learn about nature. Further, people used to kill animals for food; therefore, they learned anatomy and physiology. During the Roman era, people begun to dissect animals. Then, in the modern era, scientists relied on animals to invent and make drugs and vaccines. Nevertheless, these days we also use animals for verity of things, such as, medicines, artificial body parts, vaccines, and “surgical techniques.” Many countries use animals to examine the safety of drugs, for example, in the U.S. all new drugs have to be tested on animals because the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires so. Since drugs are tested on animals, scientists and pharmacists can insure that these drugs are safe for testing on humans, and then giving it to patients (Fellenze, 2005). However, people are split into two parties for this particular issue, and one party supports using animals, but the other party against using animals in any way, yet using animals is important for humans, but there should be restricted regulations to use them.
Animal
…show more content…
That's how you'd want it, because new drugs are dangerous, and while we don't want animals to suffer it's preferable to accidentally killing humans with untested chemicals. Animalresearch.info has a list of all the diseases for which we now have treatments thanks, in part, to animal testing: from Aids to whooping cough, the safety of new treatments was first assessed through testing them on animals (Chivers,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing has become one of a number of controversial issues because of the effects that it has on animals. Supporters of animal testing justify these effects because they believe that animal testing is the only way to find new cures for diseases. Research that has been done on this matter has proven it to be an ineffective way of finding cures. Furthermore, the reason why animal testing should not continue is because it leads to animals having psychological problems, dwindling of the number of endangered animals and cures that have been proven on animals do not work on people.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once the public became aware that animals were being injured and killed from after being subjected to testing for human products, whether or not animal testing should be permitted has become a controversial debate. Some people think animal testing is a necessity for human safety. Other people think that animal testing is not essential, and harms animals unnecessarily. In comparing these arguments, the proper conclusion is that animal testing should not be permitted. Animal testing is not something that has to be done.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration admits that more than half of their experiments involving animals result in the trash because the difficulty of handling with animals are producing false information. Animal testing is unpredictable because the condition of each individual animal and species will vary. Clearly, experimenting with animals is unreasonable, dangerous, and…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some doctors and scientists believe animal testing is not the best method for medical advances for many reasons and examples. In multiple cases, certain drugs have proven effective on animals but are not effective on humans. This occurs most often when testing drugs for stroke. Others include the following examples: a therapeutic dose of aspirin in a human is poisonous, but it has no negative effects to different animals; benzene causes leukemia in humans but not in mice; insulin produces birth defects in humans but not in animals; morphine calms people but excites some animals; chloramphenicol produces aplastic anemia in some humans but saves animals; fenclozic acid causes liver toxicity in people but not in some animals; penicillin is highly poisonous to a few animals but helps humans (Gorman 49).…

    • 1858 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For most people there are two scenarios that come to mind when they hear animal testing. The first scenario is that scientist are torturing, neglecting and abusing the animals that are being tested on. The other scenario is that scientist are being ethical, take care of the animals and are creating life-saving medicines. This makes the use of animals in experiments a controversial topic; a topic that isn’t quite black and white when argued. There are different types of animal testing like, medical testing and cosmetic testing; one is more ethical than the other.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On average, about 26 million animals are taken and used as little test subjects for big corporations to test their possibly harmful, and occasionally lethal, products before they release them to the public's use. This testing on animals began in 500 B.C and many corporations that participate in it see no harm, and have absolutely no intentions of stopping it anytime soon. There are many people that think testing these possibly dangerous products on innocent animals is not a big deal, but this paper will inform the public with some statistics and also give you the writer's perspective on why animal testing is wrong. One thing that is very arguable when talking about whether testing on these creatures should be approved, and continue or…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While scientists often argue that animal testing is necessary for medical advancement, it can be considered inhumane and is not always necessary. Animals are used in research to determine the safety of products, advance in science, study disease, and develop forms of treatment. While there are alternatives for…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lifesaving drugs and medication could come out even faster if scientists tested on humans rather than animals because of the difference in human and animal body chemistry. Considering this, animal testing cannot be justified by the fact that it has saved many human…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As said before, animals and humans have very different internal systems which means that some chemicals that would be harmful to animals could be perfectly fine to give to humans. An example of this is the drug aspirin. Aspirin is harmful to some animal species but alright to give to humans. Animal testing for medical purposes is pretty much worthless. Instead of wasting all the time…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If we were to keep progressing in finding advanced ways on testing medicine and products, we would be able to stop animal testing all together. Jayshree Vencatesan states in her article “Alternatives to the use of animals in research, testing and education,” “The concept, developed by Russell and Burch advocates that, animal testing protocols conform to the three Rs. Replacement of animal testing by alternative methods is the most radical of the methods proposed, although a differentiation is made between absolute and relative replacement”…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How would someone feel if they were confined in a cage only to experience pain, torture, and isolation for research purposes? We have been doing that to living things for countless years, except not to humans, but to animals instead. We torment animals using unethical experiments, with little to no success. In the USA, billions of dollars is spent every year to fund these horrendous experiments. The National Institute of Health (NIH) supports this cruelty, and funds about 40% of its annual budget as well.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Satire On Animal Testing

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    We keep doing new test on animals even if they won't benefit us at all. Animals could react positively to a drug but it could be harmful to humans and this also goes the other way around. “For example TGN1412 drug was tested on…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing is a reoccurring issue that circles society without any form of hesitation as to the consequences that underlay the blinding benefits. Animal experimenting was established during the 19th century. Many products such as medicine, hair care products and cosmetics are presented to the human population as safe to use because of animal testing. Though animal testing may be a controversial issue, many people feel animal testing is for the best. Hence, animal testing should be quickly addressed, for there is plenty of negative aspects that people choose to ignore on a day to day basis without juxtaposing the good and bad outcomes.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abolishing Animal Testing

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal testing causes pain to animals all over the world, it exploits them for our need. It has existed for hundreds of years, but recently a movement has started to abolish the usage of animals in testing products and medication. Animal testing is wrong and should be abolished in favor of newer, better solutions, it often causes pain to the animal, and in most cases the results cannot be applied to humans, some may argue that because animal testing is a tried and true science, it must stay, but there are now technological advances to replace it. Animal testing causes animals pain, and therefore it is an inhumane practice and should be abolished. In 2007, over 77,000 animals suffered pain due to animal testing and were not given drugs to…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World Medical Association Delcaration of Helsinki states that human trials should be preceded by tests on animals. Due to the incredible complexity of human body, when conducting researches for potential toxicity, the lives of human volunteers should not be put in danger unnecessarily (Marvizon). Because some of it is too harmful and invasive, some requires genetic manipulation that would be unethical in human being (Marvizon). However, it seems like the drugs that pass animal tests are not necessarily safe. Animal test on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed that it was protective towards the hearts of ice, but caused more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths on human (Mcvey).…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays