Animal Testing Is Cruel To Pursue Technology By Killing Animals

The testing on animals is a very touchy subject. It makes people wonder whether or not its cruel to advance technology by killing innocent animals. Killing animals for testing has its benefits but it's still inhumane to do that to animals. It can destroy populations of animals if tested often and if every lab has its own supply of animals the populations will drop by extreme numbers. The animals that are tested on often get terrible treatment as the people testing on them know they will soon die. 0e9
By testing on animals we can get a head start on technology, curing diseases but even the animal closest to our genetics, the monkey, will produce different results then humans when tested with chemicals. This means that a monkey might not have harsh side effects but humans might. The testing sometimes doesn’t produce results at all and even if it did it would take countless amounts of tries and animals have life's too. For some people in their religion killing animals like this is very cruel and almost considered murder. It is very inconsiderate to kill animals like this and doing this should not be the way to advance in technology there are different routes that we can take.
You can test …show more content…
A lot of people believe that because many scientific breakthroughs require animal testing but what they don’t understand is that just because they used animal testing doesn’t mean the breakthrough came from the testing. Many times breakthroughs use animal testing but don’t actually use any of the information they got from the testing due to the fact it can be inconclusive to use animals and assume that humans will react the same way. Also you can say that animals are better test subjects due to their short life span but the animals that do have short life spans don’t prove to be genetically similar to us at all including lab rats and other kind of