Ancient Greece Case Study

Improved Essays
Ancient Greece has an interesting process to decide who will be one of the jurors to take part in one certain trial. The jury was elected by nine consuls by tribal ballot, and the tenth tribunal was drawn by the clerk of the magistrate. The court had ten entries, one for each tribe, twenty for each tribe, two tribes for the tribunal, one for the jury, one for each of the ten, and another for the box, The jury 's vote is here, in addition to two large bowl. At each entrance stood the rods equal in number to the number of jurors, the same as the number of sticks, to the urn, the acorns with letters, beginning with the eleventh letter, lambda, The number is equal to the number of tribunals required. Any person who is over thirty years old, who …show more content…
In the case of a private matter, the matter is communicated to a private litigant. In each of the four categories provided for by the law, the litigant 's declaration is limited to suit the issue of litigation. In the case of a public case, a civil litigant will be sent to the litigant. There prepared a water meter, there is a small pipe, the water into this, to provide the length of time in the debate. In cases involving more than five thousand de Lakma, ten gallons are permitted, and the second time, three gallons each. Between the thousand and five thousand drachmas, the first to speak of seven gallons, the second two to steal; less than one thousand DS Lakma, five gallons and two plus steal. Mediation between the hostile parties, indeed six plus steal, no second statement. When the secretary read a resolution into law, or sworn statements and treaties, the ballot into the management of the water when the official will be more his hands on the water pipe. However, if the case is carried out in accordance with the fixed limits of the day, he will not stop the supply of water, but must provide an equal supply of …show more content…
When the public prosecution case must be submitted to a one-thousand-member jury, the two courts are merged into one, [the most important case is filed] with 1,500 jurors, or three tribunals. The voting ball is made of copper, with a shaft in the center, half the center of the polling ball is perforated, the other half is not perforated. At the end of the speech, the official who designated the ticket was about to cast the ball for two passes and one for each chapter, one for piercing and the other for no perforation. This is clearly seen by the litigants, so that no one takes two hollow or two solid balls. And then designated the official to take this job to take the stick of the jury, as he has been voted for the proof. Each voucher was written with a "3", because he took out the certificate, you can receive three Ober. So that all of them will vote; for voters will not receive this voucher. In the court there are two bottles, one of the copper, one wood, two separate, so that someone secretly thrown into the ball can not see the ball, the jury will vote here, copper bottle into a few votes, wood Bottle into the vote, copper bottle has a lid, covered with a mouth, its large just to accommodate a voting ball, so that a person can not vote two votes. When the jury voted, the shearer first asked whether the litigant needed evidence from the witness, since they could not deny it after the ballot had begun. Then he announced

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Cicero's Against Verres 1, Cicero attempts to convict Verres, the governor of Sicily, with extortion. Although Cicero speaks much about Verres's character, this speech also greatly relates to contemporary courts. This speech overall speaks to the level of corrupt that occurs in court systems, either ancient or contemporary. With no doubt, there is still aspects of corruption in modern-day courts, which will always be inevitable.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Professor of Law at George Mason University wrote an article about the jury nullification in the Washington Post. In it he focuses of various aspects that make this process so interesting and contradicting. The author give his personal view on jury nullification and his initial attitude toward it. Jury nullification can be seen as a two edged sword, because it is not applied on constant and consistent basis. The author, Ilya Somin agrees that it can curb unjust laws, however it can backfire.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dbq Ancient Greece

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The ancient Greek civilization had two memorable and influential achievements, one of which was architectural and the other political. As seen in the Parthenon, the Greeks were unbelievable architects, and one of the most important inventions, if not the most important invention, was the column (document 2). The column can be seen on many Greek structures including manors, government buildings and other buildings. Columns augmented the Greeks capability of building structures. Another achievement of the ancient Greeks was the ideology of a democracy.…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ancient Greece Dbq

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ancient Greece has contributed a variety of subjects from poetry to philosophy, but what are the areas Ancient Greece had the greatest influence? Ancient Greece has been significantly influential to American culture, specifically in the area of political structure and science, although, entertainment is also noteworthy. In 508 BCE, Democracy begun (Doc. 1); a political system that introduced unbiased judgment and would be later expanded upon for the American political principles. Democracy was a government crafted by the people, that is to say, Athenian men who were allowed to vote.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This movie depict a court case involving an 18 year alleged murder who was found guilty by all except one juror after the information of the case was told. Furthermore, the remaining juror argued his point until he was able to convince everyone to the young man’s innocence. Through this endeavour I learned that the jury has to has almost no doubt in the case of a murder trial to make a verdict, thus all members have to agree. A second lesson I learned is that the jury is chosen at random in the idea that in most cases the jurors have no prior knowledge to the case. In addition the importance of the 12 member jury was clearly reflected in this movie to show how importance of the unanimity.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A fundamental aspect of the American justice system is the right of every person accused of a crime, to a trial by jury. The defendant, presumed ‘innocent until proven guilty’, has the right to be judged by a group of his or her peers based on the evidence presented, the assumption being that the defendant will be judged in a fair and impartial manner. However, human beings are fallible and can be subject to faulty reasoning, alongside irrational and biased thinking. The play Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose is set in a mid twentieth century American jury room. Twelve strangers, all male, are brought together to deliberate the facts of a seemingly straightforward case, a young man accused of murdering his father; their decision, which must be unanimous, will either take, or save a young mans life.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contradicting his opinion troubles Juror #2 and causes him to respond meekly. He also does not have a lot of power in the room, which contributes to his guilty vote. When the foreman said, “All those voting “guilty” raise your hands,” Juror #2 immediately looks around the room and saw some hands raise and then raises his own hand (11). Because of his unassertive personality, he is vulnerable to the other juror’s opinions. Although he is extremely timid, he starts to gain his voice because he is starting to get tired of being pushed aside by Juror #3 and begins to participate…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    | | | |No enquiry allowed into jury deliberations after verdict, even if juror | |Section 51 Criminal Justice & Public Order Act 1994 creates offence |alleges racial or any other type of bias or wrongdoing by the jury. | |to intimidate or threaten to harm a juror. | | |Prosecution and defence "challenges" correct the problems caused by |Jury vetting is against the principle of random selection. | |random selection.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Over the years, the role and the responsibility of the jury have been through numerous transformations, hence these improvements made the presence of jury trials a highly controversial topic, leading to the question ‘Are juries needed in the English legal system?’. This essay aims to argue this question from different perspectives. It will first describe the evolution of the jury system and their current role in UK justice. Then, it will go through to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of having such a system using relevant cases. Lastly, it will mention the alternatives for the jury system and conclude by providing an answer to the question mentioned above.…

    • 2069 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Greek Revolution, also known as the as the Greek War of Independence, was a waged by the Greeks against the Ottoman Empire between 1821 and 1832. The Greek revolutionaries were assisted by the Russian Empire, Great Britain, France, and several other European powers. The Ottomans were supported by the Eyalet of Egypt, and partly by the Beylik of Tunis. The revolution was lead by a society called Filiki Eteria, who under the Leadership of Alexander Ypsilantis aimed to unite all Greeks in an armed organization to overthrow Turkish rule led by Sultan Mahmud II and revive the Byzantine Empire which fell in 1453. Also they called for an empire with Constantinople as the capital, and did not wish the formation of a new national state.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The justice system of America is constantly criticized for being unfair. The establishment of an unfair justice system is due to bias and bigotry. The play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose shows the prejudices of the system as twelve different men, from different past, must concur and make a verdict on a murder case. The author indicates that the justice system is unfair through biases portrayed in the juror’s dialogue, past history, and attitude in making a verdict.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whisked away from their routine life to partake in a communal decision, the dutiful juror rationalizes the inconvenience caused by assuring their verdict's importance and sympathizing, "'Before God, that could be me on trial. If that were so, God forbid, I would want those in the jury to be as responsible as I pledge to be and as terrified of error as I am'" (Mamet ix). The juror, possessing the ability to connect their life to the person on trial, intends to seek accuracy in determining the necessity of repercussions. However, a more callous juror may take the decision lightly. Contrary to the conscientious juror's reasoning,…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First of all, they start talking about the knife that was used to kill the victim. All evidence points out that the knife was purchased by the boy and that he used it to kill his dad. Even though the boy said that he lost the knife, the jury is convinced that it is the same knife because it is a very rare and unique one, but then the juror #8 takes out of his pocket and exact look like knife, staying that he bought it at a pawn shop at the boy’s neighborhood pointing out that there is a possibility that anyone could have used a similar knife to kill the victim. At this moment some of the men start to doubt about their judgement. Then, juror #8 calls out for another voting, so they can find out if somebody has change his mind.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Rising and Falling of the Greece Nowadays, people believed that Greek shaped the original culture of the Western civilization. It is also a junction for the Eastern and Western civilization. There are three significant periods of the Greeks: the Hellenic periods (2000-338 B.C.E), the Hellenistic period (336-323 B.C.E), and the period of the conquest by Roman (200-146 B.C.E). [ Page 54] During the periods, the people of Greece had the remarkable contribution on many careers, such as Science, Mathematics, Philosophy, Literature, Architecture, Politics, and Arts.…

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, he has behaviour role which conflict and frustration taken in action has influence his judgement. Moreover, his stubborn and bad temper has effect his decision and drive his vote of guilty. The juror 3 grow angry and nearly attack juror 8 and this action has weakness his support between the jurors. The intuition or feeling which make decisions with heart and escalation of commitment bias which do not admitted to making a wrong decision.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics