How To Write An Essay On 12 Angry Men Jury

This movie depict a court case involving an 18 year alleged murder who was found guilty by all except one juror after the information of the case was told. Furthermore, the remaining juror argued his point until he was able to convince everyone to the young man’s innocence. Through this endeavour I learned that the jury has to has almost no doubt in the case of a murder trial to make a verdict, thus all members have to agree. A second lesson I learned is that the jury is chosen at random in the idea that in most cases the jurors have no prior knowledge to the case. In addition the importance of the 12 member jury was clearly reflected in this movie to show how importance of the unanimity.
One of the main issues involved in this movie is the idea of an all male jury although this has changed in modern practices. In the instance in this movie a defendant appears to have …show more content…
In result jurors with knowledge of relevance to the case should be left in the jury as long as they are not predispositioned to one side. In regards to the unanimous 12-member jury I find this this to be crucial to a fair verdict because of one person ora group of people can go against what the majority believes. In cases where the jury can come to a single conclusion it should be possible for another jury to be brought in on the case especially in cases involving the death sentences. On the other hand it could also help the jury to make a decision of the judge was able to state their opinion based on the facts of the case as long as it does not completely move the jury. In conclusion the jury process could be changed in many ways to improve the process however, because these changes would likely help one side more than the other thus bringing on a unfair justice