Letters To Herodotus Analysis

Improved Essays
In his Letters to Herodotus, Epicurus’ material outlook assumes that all things are made out of atoms, an argument that he extends to the soul. He raises the point that the soul is material and capable of sensation, and these sensations build out thoughts; however, this assumption tends to categorize human thoughts and limit originality and creativity.
In the text, Epicurus explains that the soul is a structure that is material and primarily used for sensation; these sensations become responsible for our thoughts and reason. The soul’s relationship to the body is important in this respect. For example, Epicurus explains that the soul is furnished by the body and cannot survive without it. For this argument, he assumes that sensations are not
…show more content…
The underlying reason for the soul being a special material is that it affects not just our daily bodily processes, but also immaterial things (i.e. sensations of love, happiness, betrayal that are not tied down to one specific part of the body). This is significant because he means that if a person were to lose his arm, he would still be able to experience things like love and happiness. Even though he has lost part of the body (and therefore some little part of the soul that caused sensations in his arm), the rest of his soul remains intact so he is not deprived of the feeling of other sensations. In this sense, the body cannot produce sensation on its own and needs the soul. In this way, the soul acts upon the body (i.e. causes/creates sensations that can be felt), but it is also dependent on the body because the body acts on the soul through providing a vehicle for things to be felt; after death, the body ceases to exist and the soul has nothing through which to furnish sensations. This relationship between the soul and sensation provides a basis for thoughts. From Epicurus’s …show more content…
If the soul is so closely tied to the body, this presents some problems. Since the soul is present as a part of every human body, and human bodies have similar morphologies, then that means all souls a structured in a similar way. This part of Epicurus’ experiment makes sense because since the soul is responsible for sensation, sensations should be similar across all humans. Proof exists in the real world because universal feelings, such as grief over the death of a loved one, manifest them selves across different people and even different species. However, the lapse in reasoning comes when Epicurus states that thoughts result from a complex set of sensations. Since sensations are universal across different humans, his implies that humans’ thoughts and reasons are also universal. However, this poses a problem when it comes to creating original ideas and approaching situations creatively. For example, if we assume the opposite of Epicurus’ argument, that thoughts are not just a set of sensations, we can see that different people can think differently about certain situations. This is true in the real world because even though food causes the same sensation in our body (i.e. filling an empty stomach, providing energy), our thoughts about certain types of foods can differ (whether they are pleasant or unpleasant).

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    He also teaches about what the soul is and the relation it has to the body and what happens to us after we die. His two letters speak of how death is the separation of the soul from the body. He also writes about pleasure and how we must separate ourselves from them in order to find the truth. He explains atomistic theory to Herodotus. Reality is composed of atoms and the void; atoms collide with other atoms which led to a reaction that led to the world theory for perception and…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Phaedo Analysis

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    So with that being said, the body resorts to its unreliable senses that clouds the souls knowledge. Socrates could also argue that his theory of opposites could also relate to the relationship between the body and the soul. As he says, everything that exists comes from its opposite. It is clear to use that the all-knowing soul is what is important to us in the long run, for it carries on past the physical world. Moreover, we also are aware the body is the only threat to cloud our thoughts and steer us away from nourishing our soul.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While, even with modern science, we cannot explain the phenomenon of the consciousness or free will, properties a soul exhibits, but we have not yet seen any prove of the existence of the soul either. Nagel suggested the existence of the afterlife hinges on the existence of the soul, however Socrates has assumed the existence of the soul prior to his arguments. Given, Socrates’ soul means the life force of an object, unlike our understanding of the soul as a ghostly driver of the mind, but the same objection can still be applied. Why must the life force be the active participant in bringing upon life, then returning to the unknown as the living dies? As Socrates himself would said, our senses cannot be trusted.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mind is extended from the body and interacts with brain to form our private selves. The body depends on the mind to function, but the mind can live without the body. According to Rene Descartes, “…when my body is hurt, I, who am merely a thinking thing, should not feel pain…For all these sensations of hunger, thirst, pain, ect. are in truth none other than certain confused modes of thought which are produced by the union and apparent intermingling of mind and body” (297). Rene Descartes means that the reason that people have emotions and feelings is because they have a mind.…

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Melissa would argue that Matthew’s condition is not analytic because, his quality of life will not be abstract, Matthew cannot maintain abstract thoughts in his condition. Secondly, Matthew’s condition states that Matthew will not likely be himself due to his severe head trauma. Therefore, Matthew’s situation is nonsense. However, Melinda could argue that Hume’s basic definition of mental activity is that materials come in, it is processed, resulting in true knowledge. It shouldn’t matter if it isn’t abstract or whether he will not be truly himself.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Besides, Descartes claims that this personal body have some particular perception which are recognized by the mind as being felt on the very own body: pain and pleasure. Consequently, Descartes argues that the human body is intimately intermingled with the mind, and the production of knowledge concerning some elements of the physical world depends on the relationship between these elements. As it widely known, Descartes’ dualism carries out some serious epistemological problems that Descartes dealt with in his correspondence with the princess Elizabeth. However, for our actual purpose it is enough that Descartes argues that the human body shares its substance with other physical objects; i.e. that the human body is an extend substance.…

    • 2575 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the end, Jackson concludes that physicalism, the belief that the world consists only of its physicalities, is false (1986, p. 295). Another philosopher to discuss property dualism was David Chalmers. Chalmers “Consciousness and its Place in Nature”, sets out to discuss what exactly consciousness is. He states that one is conscious where there is something it is like to be that being (2003, p. 2). This just means that since many people know what it is like to have a(n) emotional experience, painful experience, sensory experience, etc., that all these people are conscious because they are able to sympathize and empathize, and have some understanding as to what other people are feeling and…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From Plato’s perspective, trapped in his body, one’s soul was deceived by the world that he directly perceived, and only through the pure exercise of reason or philosophical thinking could one authentically reach the very truth of the world-the world of form where everything is objective, perfect, eternal and independent. The sensible world is just an imperfect replica of the world of form constructed by the divine craftsman (the Demiurge). Therefore, in Plato’s theory, the measurement of reality seems to be the extent to which something is similar to the world of form, which means that the closer a thing is to the world of form, the more real the thing is. Nevertheless, such a measurement is not convincing enough to me and thus raise my further thinking. The world of form, a perfect and eternal world is actually predicted by Plato rather than proved by him.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Concept Of Dualism

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cartesian Dualism is the idea of the French philosopher Rene Descartes, Cartesian being developed from Descartes’ name. (1) His theory was designed after Aristotle’s, which is that humans possess an entity called the soul, which is entirely independent of the body. The Dualist philosophies declare that the mind is completely separate from the body, and therefore is accountable for all conscious feelings, moods, understandings, and beliefs. The brain however is still considered to as much a part of the body as any other physical thing found within it. (2) These same principles state that the brain is part of the body.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nonetheless, one of the primary notes that Aristotle makes in demonstrating this application of this theory to bodies and souls is indeed difficult to deny. He claims that for any body, of any kind “having life,” (or, the body of a living being), the body itself “cannot be soul” (Aristotle 412a19). This indeed is a claim that is generally accepted, for the claim that the body and the soul are distinct neither a new nor a radical claim. Hence, for animate bodies, the body itself “is the subject or matter, not what is attributed to it” (Aristotle 412a19). If the body is a substance in the sense of matter, it follows that the soul, then, is the “substance in the…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays