Linda Badham's Theory Of Cloning

Improved Essays
It would seem unimaginable that in time God would resurrect all persons who have passed to their original bodily form. That those who were cremated and their ashes spread in the ocean or on earth would be restored by God’s will. Like most people, I’ve experienced loss of a loved one, my mother who was cremated and her ashes spread in Rocky Mountain National Park, her request while living. Linda Badham’s realistic approach of resurrection and the problems associated with life after death brought about a sense of fear and dread within me. Linda Badham brings to light, how unlikely is it that our various atoms would come together to reconstruct our original human form (Peterson, et al., Philosophy of Religion, p.507)? Would we not once again …show more content…
Let’s use cloning as an example. If scientists could make an exact replica of me and transfer all of my memories, experience, and thoughts that identify me as myself, where no one would be able to tell the original or clone apart, who then could we say would live again after death (Ibid)? There instead would have to be a continuation of existence after death in the form of a soul which survives physical death. If God were to recreate my body, he would then place my soul within my recreated body; my soul which uniquely identifies me (Ibid). That as Descartes suggests there is a non-material existence of my mind referred to as dualism that is incorporated within my soul which enables me to be conscious perhaps to see when I no longer have a pair of eyes (Ibid). However, a scientific naturalist would propose that “our personal experiences and emotions are intimately linked to our body chemistry” (Peterson, et al., Philosophy of Religion, p.509). Suggesting it is our physicality, our brain that allows us to have a conscious and experience our emotions. Once physical death occurs and the brain dies then so do …show more content…
Scientists are aware of our body composition including the complexity of our body parts. How we in fact see, hear, and feel is all explainable via scientific discoveries regarding the human body. To think that our spiritual body or soul is still able to see and hear is quite astonishing. Perhaps this further strengthens the acceptance of a soul and that as created beings we are more than the sum of our physical body parts, much, much more. It would seem only an all-powerful God could create such spiritual existence that precedes our birth and survives the grave. With a light at the end of the tunnel so to speak that those who have preceded me and those that follow will once again live and have ever lasting

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The first and second premises that death exists and the body and soul are separate is acknowledged in biocentrism. Essentially, biocentrism argues that the body is composed of living tissue and cells while the mind is our perception. “Without perception, there is in effect no reality. Nothing has existence unless you, I, or some living creature perceives it, and how it is perceived further influences that reality. (“A New Theory of the Universe”).…

    • 2383 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The body is just a messenger of the brain and it is directed by it only. Then, even if the body is dead, a person can still survive. In a scenario involving brain rejuvenation, if a new brain is built that is identical to the original brain, we cannot say that the new person possessing the copy of the brain is the same as the original person. It is whoever has the original brain that is the real person even though the two brains may have similar psychological characteristics. In conclusion, we can prove that there’s a possibility of life after death and one of them was proven in the Marie/Julia’s case.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His ideas that the souls are unchanging and immortal, surviving the death of the body are merely his speculation or interpretation. So with that in mind Socrates believes that Schwartz has the mind of the person hit by the cement truck is now in the body of the person who had the stroke. John Locke’s argument is that the mind is the self is a blank slate on which experience writes. Locke doesn’t believe that the self necessarily exists in one soul or substance. He argues the conscious awareness of the self is itself as a thinking, reasoning, and reflecting identity.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the use of art, music, science, medicine, etc. God has blessed all of us with a particular talent to share with others. Naturalists believe knowledge is acquired through human reasoning, with the aid of science. Through the use of evolution, naturalist believe the concept of knowledge and thought were programmed into man over time. Using science as their source of credibility, naturalists do not believe in the existence of anything that cannot be proven.…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    God is love and God’s love is so great that He gave His Only Son. God is Jehovah-jireh, “the God who provides.” God is Jehovah-shalom, “the God of peace.” God is immutable, meaning God is ever perfect and unchanging. God…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If they did, their soul would not be reincarnated and recycled until enlightenment. I believe the soul belongs uniquely to the body, and when that body dies, it is free to either transcend time and space in another realm, or haunt this one without a…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being An Atheist Argument

    • 1309 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Bible says that mankind is God’s most prized above all creation, created in His image. The process of birth is amazing to me, although I am confident that science can explain away the mystery of this process to satisfy the atheist view. However, can the atheist explain with complete certainty why cells divide at just the right time and the right number of times to create a human being or why the body might reject an embryo because of a certain defect? There surly has to be some kind of intervention by an intelligent designer. Therefore, I believe that the human being is an example of genuine indisputable design and purpose.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How can religion actually help you form a hypothesis? It can't. How can religion…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If completed that easily, why not simply allow that physical matter is also a thinking substance? (Hume, 591). If the body rots, disperses and ceases to be human, why not think the same about the soul? If one was to reply by saying that mental substances are simple and immortal, for Hume, this implies that they would also be non-generable, and should not come into being either. If this were true, we should have memories of our births, which we don’t (Hume, 592).…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then his second is Theory of Recollection which assumes that the information that we have in our mind is received from our previous life. The third is Theory of Affinity, it explains when our body dies, and our soul will continue to live. And the fourth is Theory of Forms, explains that the Forms, is the cause of all things in the world and everything in it participates in the forms. These arguments give fair reasoning to believe in the immortality of the soul; however there are some arguments that can be made. In this paper I will attempt to evaluate each argument in order, as well as defining the immortality of the soul.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays