Analysis Of Intellect: Mind Over Matter, By Mortimer Adler

Improved Essays
In Intellect:Mind over Matter, Mortimer Adler probes the relationship between the mind and the body. He describes the four main theories regarding this relationship and separates them into two categories: extreme and moderate. Among the four theories, Adler argues in favor of moderate immaterialism. His argument is easily the most convincing as it accounts for the essential difference between man and animal, our intellect, while acknowledging the congruity between the mind and body.
The extreme positions described by Adler are monism and dualism. The monistic theory stems from the idea that matter and matter alone exists- “that the world consists of nothing but bodies and their motions.” Therefore, there is no-non-material mind; rather the mind is strictly a synonym for the brain. Alder further explains that in monism, “There is nothing to talk or think about except the brain, its activities, its states, and its processes.” In contrast, dualist theorists, such as Plato and Descartes, hold that man is composed of two utterly distinct substances. In dualism, the mind and the body are not only different but they exist separately of each other. They are “as different and distinct as the
…show more content…
There are many things that differentiate man from animals: man can create laws and associations, man rationalize the danger in a situation, man reason the intentions of someone. None of these, or any others similar to them, would be possible without conceptual thought. By reducing the mind to the brain and its activities, the two materialistic theories (monism and moderate materialism) cannot include the intellect. No one has discovered an organ of conceptual thought. Moreover, if our cognitive function is reduced to merely a brain, then it seems impossible to account for any difference between a human’s brain and an animal’s

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Essay 3 Given what we know or can safely assume to be true of animal brains and behaviors, do animals actually exhibit thought and reason? The answer depends in large measure on one’s definition of thought and reason. Philosophers René Descartes and David Hume hold conflicting views about the nature and possession of thought and reason and, as a result, offer starkly different arguments for and against the existence of thought and reason in animals. While Descartes maintains in Part Five of Discourse on Method that only humans are capable of conscious thought, Hume asserts that human and animal behaviors are not so different in Section Nine of his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He yearns to reduce this entire thing in materialistic terms, yet still preserving the humanistic qualities. He does this by stating mental states are identical with physical states. Although they have this relationship mental states are identical inner states and behavior is an outer state. Thus, this means that if one targets the correct area of the brain he can eliminate these mental states leaving being an animal of stimuli. All of these perspectives shed an illuminating light on the issues of physicalism and dualism which is to be debated for years to come.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This belief the mind and the brain are related to each other as two distinct sorts of properties. The mind is believed to emerges from the brain but it is not dependent upon it. One could visualize this ideology as the brain as a snow cloud and the mind the unique, independent snowflakes that fall from it. The mind is seen as something spiritual and the body is physical. Since the mind comes from the brain; the brain contains both physical and spiritual properties (Mohn, 2017).…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will be explaining and evaluating Argument 2, on page 36 of Jaegwon Kim's Philosophy of Mind, which supports Cartesian substance dualism. This argument, which I call the argument of transparency, attempts to support the first major tenant of Cartesian substance dualism: There are substances of two fundamentally different kinds in the world, mental substances and material substances—or minds and bodies. The essential nature of a mind is to think, be conscious, and engage in other mental activities; the essence of a body is to have spatial extensions (a bulk) and be located in space. (Kim 34)…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will also discuss Kathleen Akin’s objection to Nagel’s essay called What it is like to be Boring and Myopic. Finally, I will conclude that Nagel’s thought experiment displays a problem for the doctrine of monism that needs to be resolved. Materialism is a form of monism, which emphasizes that matter is the principal substance, and that all phenomena are a product of material interaction. Materialism is analogous to physicalism, which claims everything in the world is physical. If materialism and or physicalism are factual, then how do we explain the conscious occurrences we and other animals possess?…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    PHI 1000 Fall 2016 Prof. Drain Essay #2 Thoughts on Thought After examining the several angles to the issue of animal cognition, it is my conclusion that non-human animals are in fact capable of thought. Although humans certainly display a superior cognitive ability, I believe the cognition of animals is not of an entirely different type, and that whatever difference remains is simply one of degree. While Davidson and Descartes tend to argue that language is a necessary component for rational creatures, Hobbes and Searle give non-human creatures more “cognitive credit,” citing their ability perceive, and to have and correct beliefs, as proof of being conscious, thinking, beings. Pointing to the immense biological similarities between humans…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism vs Materialism The mind/body problem, the question of what is the relationship between the mind and the body, is commonly seen as a key issue in the philosophy of the mind (Sober, 2013, p. 204). The two categories of views discussed in Sober’s ‘Core Questions in Philosophy’ that attempt to resolve the mind/body problem are dualism and materialism. Dualism is the theory that the mind and the brain are two fundamentally different substances (Sober, 2013, p. 204). Conversely, materialism says that matter is the one and only fundamental substance in nature, and the notion that mental phenomena are a result of physical interactions follows (Sober, 2013, p. 204).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In their work, The Extended Mind, Andy Clark and David Chalmers present the extended mind hypothesis to argue against the idea of the mind consisting solely of inputs and outputs. The hypothesis argues that the mind is not simply an internal thing, but rather that it can exist externally and be part of an individual’s environment. Clark and Chalmers argue for this this by presenting the examples of Otto, a man whose memories and knowledge lie in a notebook, and Inga someone who stores all the information in her mental states. I will argue that the extended mind hypothesis is unsuccessful because there is no clear line of what is actually known and what is only thought to be known. The extended mind hypothesis is the argument that…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dualism Vs Physicalism

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The view of physicalism gives a stronger and more plausible answer to the mind-body problem. There are several reasons why this particular view gives a more sensible for answer to the problem at hand. These reasons include the rationale behind the reasoning of brain research, how the different aspects of reductive physicalism is able to address the non-physical aspects of the mind, as well as the less than sensible claims that the opposing view, dualism, presents in comparison. One of the main reasons why physicalism is able to prove itself to be the better answer to the mind-body problem is based off of research that society has learned about on the brain.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question of whether the self can exist separately from the body is hotly debated. One argument that attempts to answer this question is called the conceivability argument. However, the conceivability argument is insufficient to prove the possibility of a non-physical self because our ability to conceive of something is flawed. The conceivability argument is in favor of dualism, suggesting the existence of a non-physical mind.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Extended Mind Reduced to Absurdity The Extended Mind thesis is the notion that the mind is not only located in the head, but also extends to the external world and body. The theory further suggests that beliefs exist outside of the brain, and that any physical object used to aid in cognitive processes are also part of the mind. In this paper, I will discuss Clark and Chalmers’ view of the Extended Mind (EM) theory and its implications, and will argue that the theory is a reductio ad absurdum of the mental because it eliminates the boundary between the internal mental states and the external physical world and asserts that essentially everything in the world is part of the mind. Clark and Chalmers propose the theory of Active Externalism…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the following essay, one wishes to discuss why there can never be any justification for a belief in Other Minds. Descartes offers up “I think therefore I am” in First Meditations on Philosophy (Descartes, 1641), which has it’s fair share of problems but one wishes to use this quote to illustrate that while Descartes only proved that ‘I’ exist within one 's own mind, there is nothing to say that this must extend to others too. Or even to anyone but Descartes and Myself. And while that may seem an irrational claim, one shall go on to justify why this claim may hold as much rationality as its negation.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cartesian Dualism, a theory coined by Rene Descartes and examined within his sixth mediation of Meditations of First Philosophy, explains and theorizes the idea of the mind and body as two distinct substances. The theory states that the mind is not merely a physical brain as another organ of the body, but rather the non-materialistic mind and material body are two different entities. The body, having elements of extension have a reality with spatial relevance as it entails form, texture, location and weight. In comparison, the mind has non-spatial components that consist of humans’ realm of thought as it includes consciousness, images, emotions beliefs and desires. Cartesian Dualism presents many simple and seemingly rational arguments such…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The mind-body problem is primarily a question of how the mind and the body interact with and exist in harmony with one other. The fundamental issue related to the mind-body problem is that there is a significant divide between two groups: the monists and the dualists. At the core of monist thinking is the belief that only one supreme being exists. This belief is split up into two forms: physicalism, the doctrine that everything is physical matter; and idealism, the belief that everything that is thought to be physical is only an illusion. One philosopher, in particular, who held a strong conviction towards supporting monist and idealist thinking was George Berkeley.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of them specifically says that there is a distinct disconnection between the mind and body because if you were to hurt a part of the body, it would not directly affect the mind in any form. It would send sensory signals to the brain but the mind itself is still intact. I agree with this because if you were to dislocate your knee for example, your body would send sensory signals of pain to the brain and may not be in a good physical condition but your mind would be. You may be slightly discouraged or feel upset about the situation, but ultimately the dislocation of your knee has not affected your mind. I believe that this confirms his conclusion because he also gives a similar example.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays