Difference Between Monism And Dualism

Superior Essays
The mind-body problem is primarily a question of how the mind and the body interact with and exist in harmony with one other. The fundamental issue related to the mind-body problem is that there is a significant divide between two groups: the monists and the dualists. At the core of monist thinking is the belief that only one supreme being exists. This belief is split up into two forms: physicalism, the doctrine that everything is physical matter; and idealism, the belief that everything that is thought to be physical is only an illusion. One philosopher, in particular, who held a strong conviction towards supporting monist and idealist thinking was George Berkeley. Contrary to the likes of dualism, Berkeley argued that the only way a physical …show more content…
At the core of the soul’s existence is its ability to express emotion. This idea is essentially what gives each human being a sense of character capable of displaying personal emotions and detecting those same emotions in others. However, one of the ways in which an individual expresses emotion is by showing it on their face, which is part of the body. Likewise, when the mind becomes angered, the body is the first thing to respond, which can cause the hands to clench into fists, blood-veins to become constricted and more visible, and facial appearances to change. While Berkeley would only go so far as to say that the mind is capable of perceiving an emotion of anger through visual perception, Descartes would likely go further than that and agree that the mind and the body, while separate, still communicate emotions in a very similar matter. Putting this into a context that contradicts monist thinking, without the soul, a body could not express anger. Similarly, without a body, a soul could not feel anger, meaning that emotions would not exist. However, because there is no way of doubting that emotions exist, the view of monism appears to be somewhat flawed. Meanwhile, dualism manages to support its arguments and by doing so proves that it is worthy of providing a logical answer to the mind-body

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The problem of other minds and the mind body problem. Dualism has traditionally struggled to account for how an immaterial substance can interact with a material one. Behaviorism on the other hand is a physicalist theory and implicit in it is the idea that the mind arises out of the material physical world. What dualism fails to account for, Behaviorism solves simply by ascribing to a view of the purely material. The other is the problem of other minds- the objection to Dualism based on the undesired conclusion that if all we can be sure of is our own bodies, we can never know for certain that others even really exist. Dualism still struggles with this. However, Behaviorism dissolves this problem because again, in virtue of its physicalist foundation, it implicitly assumes a consistency among other humans that Substance dualism doubted. Because of this, minds are physically the same and only experientially different and so can be assumed to operate similarly to one another. Because of the physicalism of Behaviorism, it is able to dissolve two long existing problems of…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mind-body problem is a very unique problem. Having consciousness is what makes this problem so difficult. Without having consciousness, the mind-body problem would be much simpler and less interesting. In fact, most reductionist theories don’t even try to explain this problem. Concerning consciousness, it’s difficult to provide evidence of it but it is found at many different levels of animal life. Consciousness is referred to as being able to know what it’s like to be that organism. In this way, consciousness is a subjective experience. The most difficult part is obtaining an account of the physical basis of mind. Since the mind is subjective, its associated with a single point of view whereas, if you try to obtain a physical theory,…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper, I will define and describe the mind body problem, defend the position of property dualism, support my claim through the problem of personal identity and the problem of interaction, and provide one refute using epiphenomenalism. The mind-body problem the question of how our consciousness is created through the interaction of mental and brain states. The best way to describe the interaction between mental and brain states is through property dualism. A supporting argument for property dualism is through the problem of personal identity. Through the problem of interacting, property dualism is further strengthened as an accurate way to describe the mind-body problem. An argument against property dualism is the argument of epiphenomenalism.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dualism Vs Physicalism

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The view of physicalism gives a stronger and more plausible answer to the mind-body problem. There are several reasons why this particular view gives a more sensible for answer to the problem at hand. These reasons include the rationale behind the reasoning of brain research, how the different aspects of reductive physicalism is able to address the non-physical aspects of the mind, as well as the less than sensible claims that the opposing view, dualism, presents in comparison.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “I think therefore I am,” the popular quote of philosopher Descartes, is the main premise of his theory of Mind-body Dualism. Interactionism is the theory that there are two realities, mind and body, each of which can have an effect on the other. In contrast, dualists claim that the mind and body are two separate realities. The body is a material thing that operates in a physical reality, while the mind and mental states operate in a nonphysical reality. For the dualist, the way of thinking is an internal thinking on the inside that is private. I fully agree with Descartes’s concept of dualism. The mind is a lot more than chemical reactions going on in the brain. Thoughts, feelings, desire are all properties of the mind but not its parts. I…

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism is the idea that the mind and body are separate entities. Descartes saw the body as matter and geometrical qualities (legs, arms, feet, etc.), and the mind as one with the basic feature of thinking, that occurs in a spiritual realm. He stated that the body could never think and that the mind could not exist physically, in other words mental states could never explain physical things. He thought that the body was associated with matter and could be described as to having an extension, and the mind can not have an extension, or take up space, as it does not exist in a physical world (Leech, Oliver). Advocates of dualism, like Descartes, run into trouble on how to explain how the mental states and physical world interact and communicate. They are unable to provide enough examples as to how the mind interacts with the body to create movement, or having to force oneself to stay awake even though the body is beginning to fall asleep. For Descartes he came up with the idea that the communication happens in the pineal gland of the brain, but his explanation was vague and he did not go into many details, allowing it to simply be an unsolved mystery. Descartes strong belief in dualism would cause him to have an objection to the materialistic views, he might argue that materialistic views could not occur because the mind can exist without the body, and the body without the mind. Gilbert Ryle was a philosopher who argued against Descartes with “the dogma of the ghost in the machine”, stating that the mind-body dualism was confusing the separate entities as being compatible. Descartes argument could be flawed because of the movement of the body, as to be able to cause movement the mind has to think about it and communicate to the body to produce that movement in the…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In philosophy, a theory that includes the viewing of the the mind and body as being separate kinds of substances or natures is known as mind- body dualism. This stance implies that the mind and body not only differ in meaning but refer to different kinds of entities. Thus, a person that proposes the concept of dualism would oppose any theory that identifies mind with the brain, conceived as a physical operant. Descartes reaches this conclusion by arguing that the nature of the mind is completely and utterly distinct from that of the body, and therefore it is possible for one to exist without the other. This argument gives rise to the famous problem of mind-body causal interaction that are still commonly debated today: how can the mind cause…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Intellect:Mind over Matter, Mortimer Adler probes the relationship between the mind and the body. He describes the four main theories regarding this relationship and separates them into two categories: extreme and moderate. Among the four theories, Adler argues in favor of moderate immaterialism. His argument is easily the most convincing as it accounts for the essential difference between man and animal, our intellect, while acknowledging the congruity between the mind and body.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cartesian Dualism, a theory coined by Rene Descartes and examined within his sixth mediation of Meditations of First Philosophy, explains and theorizes the idea of the mind and body as two distinct substances. The theory states that the mind is not merely a physical brain as another organ of the body, but rather the non-materialistic mind and material body are two different entities. The body, having elements of extension have a reality with spatial relevance as it entails form, texture, location and weight. In comparison, the mind has non-spatial components that consist of humans’ realm of thought as it includes consciousness, images, emotions beliefs and desires. Cartesian Dualism presents many simple and seemingly rational arguments such…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of this mind/body problem has prompted many philosophers to create solutions, or drawn them to determine the problem does not exist. To this day, as artificial intelligence become increasingly common, and the question of how the mind relates to the body or if it even exists becomes pertinent in relation to technology, no consensus exists. Science fiction, such as the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode “The Measure of a Man”, often attempts to tackle this problem through their stories. The leaders of the two opposed parties, Picard and Maddox, both exhibit different views to the problem of mind/body.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As I was reading the many different tales in Oliver Sack’s book, I was amazed at the obscurity of each person’s case. With keeping the mind/body problem in mind while reading these tales, I was very conflicted on my position. When learning and reading about the mind/body problem in class, I really took to the monism perspectives. I believed that the mind and the nervous system are not different. I just did not understand how the mind could not be connected to the nervous system. I pictured the mind and the body as one sphere and not two totally different spheres, as dualists would argue saying that the mind and the nervous system are different. However, when reading Oliver Sack’s different tales/cases, I realized different instances where…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reading one has chosen to critically analyse is Gilbert Ryle’s Descartes ' Myth. Ryle is attempting here to undermine what he dubs ‘The Official Doctrine’, which is the idea that the generally accepted answer to the mind-body problem is that of Cartesian Dualism, as presented by Descartes in the 17th Century.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Mind Body Problem

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Philosophy, there is the well known concept of the mind-body problem. The mind-body problem explains how mental states such as beliefs, actions, and thinking are related to physical states of an individual (Stewart, p.137, 2012). The basic issue of the mind body problem is the understanding how a body can have a mind inside of it that is controlling it. A frequent question asked is are we only matter or are we matter and mind? There are four philosophical positions including; type identity theory physicalism, functionalist physicalism, property dualism, and substance dualism that have different approaches to the concept of the mind-body problem. After research and comparing each position, I have found a more suitable understanding to the…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The argument whether or not the mind and the body are distinct substances raises a still on-going debate. In this essay, I proceed to give evidence as to why the Cartesian dualism theory is flawed. First, I am going to introduce a few of Descartes’ arguments and his position on the matter. Then, I will try to pick his most appealing argument and put it up against logical reasoning and other philosophers’ viewpoints. Finally, I am going to conclude how Rene Descartes proposes fallacious arguments which object his mind-body problem.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Like Ryle, Taylor’s argument is an attempt to demonstrate the ridiculousness of Descartes’ theory. Taylor claims that “all forms of dualism arise from the alleged disparity between persons and physical objects.” In this case, Taylor is correct, the majority of his essay goes on to address the differences between the “body and soul”, and as well as how the soul is logically flawed. The core of Taylor’s argument is on how the concept of the soul itself is far too ambiguous for it to be a worthwhile point to contemplate. This is because “there are no positive properties of any ‘soul’”. Taylor states that the best we can do is that an extra something is required to set apart a body from a…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays