Phaedo And Descartes: The Comparison Of Mind And The Body

Great Essays
The subject of philosophy is a study that can be viewed in many different ways. Some ways vary in extremes from one another, but they all wish to pursue the same thing; the understanding of knowledge and human excellence. One of the most popular arguments is the comparison of mind and body. Through this paper I will go in depth on the individuals theories and discoveries, then compare them using the ideas from Plato’s Phaedo and Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy. Both philosophers share the same ideas on dualism, and believe the body to be inferior to the mind and/or soul. During the Golden Age of Pericles ' Athens, Plato, an intellectual individual, set out to understand the relations that occurred between the body and the soul. With immense studying of his former teacher, Socrates, Plato came to his realization that the body and the soul were in fact separate from one another. Not only are the two separate, but he discovered that the soul itself is immaterial and immortal and wishes nothing more then to (insert freeing the body quote). Plato’s understanding of the body would not have been possible without Socrates’ theories of opposites, recollection, and scattering of objects.
Firstly, Socrates
…show more content…
This previous quotation not only prove the immortality of the soul, is also proves that the soul and the body are separate. Since the soul waits for the cycle of the body, it shows that they are

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The body, while seemingly clearly definable and understandable, is a concept that humans have struggled to define and understand for much of history. Social conceptions of the mind of spirit shaped philosophers’ understandings of the relationship between the mind and body, as well as attitudes toward the body. In his essay “The Concept of the Body,” Eliot Deutsch presents readers with four popular modes of conceiving of the body. These models, popularized at different points throughout history, are the prison, the temple, the machine, and the instrument. Through reading Plato’s dialogue Phaedo, one gains perspective on Socrates’ conception of the body, as a prison.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Substance dualism is the ontological view that there exists two sorts of substances; mental and physical (material and immaterial). The existence of the substances are fundamentally distinct and exist independently of each other. If the soul can survive the death of the body, then there is the possibility of an after-life. Plato and Descartes are notorious for substance dualism which is also known as mind-body dualism, the believe that the soul is able to live on without the presence of the physical substance, the body. In this essay I will describe and assess the argument of substance dualism postulated by Rene Descartes (1596-1650).…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Phaedo Analysis

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Our body is one thing that does not continue on with us into the after life, according to Socrates’ teachings…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato Body

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He cares for these things only to the extent that they are necessary to meet nature's needs. The soul fares better after death and when it is not dwelling in the body. He explains that death is nothing more than the separation of soul and body. He who has lived as a true philosopher has reason to be of good cheer when he is about to die, and that after death he may hope to receive the greatest good in the other world (CliffsNotes). Hence why the soul should be the master of the body and not its…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Plato’s view of man is a soul using a body, Aquinas, following Aristotle’s conception of man, asserted that man is an embodied soul – that is human beings have a soul but it is not a body and the body isn’t the soul as well yet they are substantially united with one another. Soul, on one hand is the one which animates the human body. And this soul according to Aquinas is spiritual, intangible, and ethereal. The body, on the other hand is material, actual – that is, it exists completely. However, body and soul for Aquinas unite with one another when this soul, animates the human body.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So when we die we do not stay dead. Rather he suggest…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Socrates never proves that the soul is immortal, but rather states that it is much like things that are: “the soul is most like the divine, deathless, intelligible, uniform, dissoluble” (80b). This does not mean that the soul is immortal, but that there is a possibility that it is. However, this gigantic leap in logic, to assume because one thing is like another that it must contain the properties of the other, makes way for Simmias’ lyre and harmony argument. Simmias uses Socrates’ own faulty reasoning to state that the soul must be destroyed upon death: “One might make the same argument about harmony, lyre and strings, that a harmony is something invisible, without body, beautiful, divine and divine in the attuned lyre, whereas the lyre itself and its strings are physical, bodily, composite, earthy, and akin to what is mortal.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Soul Analysis

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, Socrates is still unsure; he still believes that the soul could be one entity rather than split into three. So to prove it he states that each part of the soul…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine a soldier losing his leg after the war. He loses a piece of his body, but does he what happens to his mind? In Descartes’ excerpt, from “Descartes Selections,” he explains how though the detachment of persons’ limb signifies separation from the body, the same cannot be said for the mind in the same context. With a series of supported arguments he proves that while the body and the mind can have a connection and a relationship with each other, the body can be divided into many parts and the mind cannot. In Discussion and around this topic, Descartes is very prevalent in his opinion around the ultimate division of the body and mind.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes believes that the mind and the body are two separate things. However, Princess Elisabeth is skeptical of this claim and asks Descartes how it is possible that our body appears to act as a result of our thoughts, if our mind were to be strictly a thinking substance with no connection to our body. This is the mind-body problem. To further exemplify her point, Princess Elisabeth explains that in her experience, physical things move as a result of another physical thing acting upon it, showing a connection between the thing that is being moved and the thing that is moving it. Because of this, she would expect there to be a connection between our mind and our body.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Mind Vs Body

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Beginning with the passage, whether the body is divisible, while the mind is indivisible, and the issue, stating that if the mind and the body are distinct. For Descartes premises, he understands himself to be a single, unified thing. What he states is that the body is by its nature divisible, while the mind is indivisible. What I’m going to discuss in this passage is that the mind is divisible as well as the body. While reading this passage I noticed how the mind and the body are distinct.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditation 6, we learn that Descartes comes to the conclusion that the mind and body are two separate entities. His belief is that through the idea that mind and body are separate entities, without the other, one can still exist. He comes to this conclusion by arguing that the mind, a non-extended thinking thing, is an entirely different being than the body, an extended thinking thing, is. He believes that the mind and soul are united to the body but still can be separated from each other and still exist.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato felt as the Body was a hindrance to the soul, almost as if the body is the prison of the soul. Plato believed that you need to balance all sides of the soul depending on what kind of society you live…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    His strongest empirical argument against the immortality of the soul goes as follows: "The soul, therefore, if immortal, existed before our birth: And if that state no wise concerned us, neither will the latter." Plato 's response to this argument would likely be that events prior to our birth, do in fact concern us because we are reminded of them every time we see approximations of forms. This rebuttal is troublesome, however, because it seeks to refute a physical argument with a metaphysical argument. Although these arguments are difficult to compare, they both offer a legitimate stance, in support of their respective…

    • 1519 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays