Hobbes Vs Augustine Analysis

Improved Essays
Show More
Lastly, Hobbes and Augustine are very similar with they describe men as beast because they have desire and as well they have free will and reason helps them to get out of things which is wrong, but according to Aristotle, he believes that the nature of man and how they become evil is with their body and their soul. Aristotle he also had desire he wanted to sink his teeth into making him one of the utmost key figures in philosophy. Aristotle goes through those types that man has gone through evil. According to Aristotle “that man by nature is blind to morality suggesting that man is naturally a creature, this backed up by his earlier works that man is born without knowledge. Then morality cannot be part of human nature as man has yet to acquire …show more content…
Meaning if your soul does something For example, if your soul does something wrong the body feels it as well as the soul. According to Aristotle “If the soul bears the same relationship to the body which the shape of a statue bears to its material basis, then we should expect some general features to be common to both; and we should be able to draw some immediate consequences regarding the relationship between soul and body”(Shields). This quote means the Body and Soul are equal to one another, they are not different, but the same if the body does something wrong the soul will feel it, for example, if the body committed a sin such as killing another person the body would not be the only one to feel it but the soul as well. Aristotle believes that the soul is a subject of the mental states which can exist alone, when separated from the body. The only way when the soul is separated from the body is during sleeping hours. The soul roams around a little bit. Aristotle tries to explain that the body is another version of the soul when the body is awake in the morning and if something is done wrong the body and soul feel it and when it is night time when the body is resetting the soul comes out of the body and does what the body would do and if anything is done wrong while the soul is not in the body it affects the soul and the body itself if it did not do anything. This can be related to free will because the …show more content…
Tomas explains that men are born for society and left alone is bad for them because as a child men are taught to be in society without society man will not exist. Tomas Hobbes believe that man can rule over another man he believes that the government should be the leviathan or a type of sea creature to put the humans in their place because they are evil. Then Augustine with the belief of free will Augustine believes that god created man and god as well created free will Augustine argues that free will is what make man evil because it allows them to do what they like especially reason which as well is called free will which can get them out of getting a sin. Augustine explains how man is evil by reason because they can get away with anything and Aristotle believes that free will and morality and the body and soul are the same can make man evil if not guided correctly because when man is born they do not understand morality and man chooses to be evil or good which comes back to free will. In my point of view these philosopher explain many different things but all have one thing in common free will is what make man evil it is because they have the decision and reason. Augustine believes that man is evil by reason and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes: Enlightenment And Revolution Assessment
    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes: Enlightenment And Revolution Assessment

    Chapter 22: Enlightenment and Revolution Assessment –Research Worksheet Directions: Completion of this worksheet is a required part of your assessment for this unit. Please type into this document and email it to your teacher in the same email as the Facebook profile. Thomas Hobbes Where was he born? Thomas Hobbes was born in Westport, in 5th April 1588.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Danny M. Hoey's Augustine
    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analysis Of Danny M. Hoey's Augustine

    Every story tells a plethora of stories depending on who the author is or how the reader depicts the story. Everyone can read a story and have a personal opinion about it; whether it is good or bad it will still be an opinion. In the story “Augustine” by Danny M. Hoey Jr the story proves that everyone can say what they want and feel no type of remorse based on people’s lifestyle. This story illustrates what society calls “acceptable” or “unacceptable” based on ones moral values.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Letters To Herodotus Analysis
    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Letters To Herodotus Analysis

    The underlying reason for the soul being a special material is that it affects not just our daily bodily processes, but also immaterial things (i.e. sensations of love, happiness, betrayal that are not tied down to one specific part of the body). This is significant because he means that if a person were to lose his arm, he would still be able to experience things like love and happiness. Even though he has lost part of the body (and therefore some little part of the soul that caused sensations in his arm), the rest of his soul remains intact so he is not deprived of the feeling of other sensations. In this sense, the body cannot produce sensation on its own and needs the soul. In this way, the soul acts upon the body (i.e. causes/creates sensations that can be felt), but it is also dependent on the body because the body acts on the soul through providing a vehicle for things to be felt; after death, the body ceases to exist and the soul has nothing through which to furnish sensations.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Aristotle And Hobbes: The Argument Of A Good Life
    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aristotle And Hobbes: The Argument Of A Good Life

    Aristotle makes it known that individual has an ultimately a purpose - a function to which we live by. Hobbes and Aristotle idea of the ultimate good life differences…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Phaedo And Descartes: The Comparison Of Mind And The Body
    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Phaedo And Descartes: The Comparison Of Mind And The Body

    During the Golden Age of Pericles ' Athens, Plato, an intellectual individual, set out to understand the relations that occurred between the body and the soul. With immense studying of his former teacher, Socrates, Plato came to his realization that the body and the soul were in fact separate from one another. Not only are the two separate, but he discovered that the soul itself is immaterial and immortal and wishes nothing more then to (insert freeing the body quote). Plato’s understanding of the body would not have been possible without Socrates’ theories of opposites, recollection, and scattering of objects.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes Vs Kant On Morality
    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes Vs Kant On Morality

    Both philosophers have similar views in which one is able to analyze their reasoning. According to Hobbes, “whatsoever is the object of any man 's appetite or desire; that is it which he for his part calleth Good: and the object of his Hate and Aversion, evil.” ( Hobbes, 2008, pg33) Things we do not prefer are immediately considered evil based on their belief, but evil is not in the thing itself.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle Being An Animal Analysis
    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aristotle Being An Animal Analysis

    In Aristotle’s view, everything in this world can be categorized. Living beings include plants and animal. The plant has nutritive soul and the animal process both nutritive soul and perceptive soul. If we discuss animal further, we can divide animal into rational animal, which is human, and non-rational animal.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Comparing Hobbes And Aristotle's Views Of Human Nature
    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Comparing Hobbes And Aristotle's Views Of Human Nature

    This is a paper comparing the Aristotle and Hobbes understandings of human nature. Aristotle states that man is a “political animal”, and that it is thus natural for man to live in a polis. Hobbes disagrees with this understanding of man a political animal, as he claims that man is actually a greedy being that is driven by power. Thus he feels that the natural state of man is a state of war. Although the two disagree initially about the man’s natural state, Aristotle comes to agree with Hobbes’ view since they agree that without a common sense of justice that individuals have no reason to live together.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Soul Analysis
    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates Soul Analysis

    This section of “Plato’s Republic” demonstrates key ideas of the soul from Socrates view point. From the start of this section Socrates introduces his ideas to Glaucon. Socrates believed that cities have three attributes. He goes on to explain that since the attributes of a city come from the people living within, the soul must also be split into three attributes. Socrates attempts to break down the soul into three different categories; the part of the soul that learns or thinks (rational), the part of the soul that desires pleasure, and the part of the soul that is spirit.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Role Of The Soul In Plato's Republic
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Role Of The Soul In Plato's Republic

    Throughout the Republic, Plato mentions the soul several times. Plato agrees that the soul is immortal and separate from the body. He also believes that the soul is eternal and according to Plato, the soul doesn’t come into existence with the body, but rather exists prior to being with the body. He believed that the soul exists inside the body until it dies. Because of this, Plato called the body the prison to the soul.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Rousseau Analysis
    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hobbes Vs Rousseau Analysis

    Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau strongly differ on their view of the purpose of the state. Hobbes sees the state as a positive institution that creates order and sows peace. Rousseau sees the state as an institution of chains, that renders it’s citizens salves to the will of the majority. Before reaching these conclusions they argue on the base nature of man. Hobbes argues that self preservation is the base of human nature whereas Rousseau argues it is property.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Argument Of Plato: There Is An Immortal Soul
    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Argument Of Plato: There Is An Immortal Soul

    Within every person, there is an immortal soul. Immortal meaning that after death the soul continues to live on. During the paper, I will explain Plato’s view towards the immortality of the soul, which argument of Plato’s is the strongest to defending his claim, then I will talk about three arguments as to why I believe there is an immortal soul within each human being. Finally, I will look back at Plato’s strongest argument from the first section and give my personal take on his belief as to why we have an immortal soul.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Views Of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke And Karl Marx
    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Views Of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke And Karl Marx

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes And Locke's View On Human Nature
    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes And Locke's View On Human Nature

    Hobbes and Locke are both social contract theorists who have influenced many citizens of this country. To begin, they both start out talking about human nature. Locke and Hobbes had very different views regarding human nature. Locke claimed human nature as reason and Hobbes claimed it as power and appetite. Locke believes that reason is the primary attribute of human nature.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Nature Vs Nurture And Nature
    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nature Vs Nurture And Nature

    Thomas Hobbes believes humans are born evil, their natural instinct is to be envious, violent, and narcissistic, however, by fear and reason, they are capable of preserving peace. On the other hand, John Locke believes humans are mostly peaceful, good, and pleasant, but circumstances can cause people to be violent and war-like. Locke and Hobbes also differed in social contract theories, whereby John Locke believed that all people have rights that need to be protected by a government, yet the people should remain in power; Thomas Hobbes supported the idea that people are all bad, and because of that, an ultimate ruler needs to establish laws that man should abide by. Although these views seem very apples and oranges, there is a huge discrepancy. John Locke promoted the preservation of all human rights, and on several occasions disapproved of slavery, however, it turns out that he actually endorsed it and proposed that people should have absolute power over them.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings