Anne Conway's Argument For The Continuity Of Mind And Body

Improved Essays
Anne Conway argued for the continuity of mind and body. During this essay I will first discuss three arguments Anne Conway made for the continuity of mind and body. I will then raise a question I have about her arguments. I will then consider how she may answer this question. I will conclude with whether or not this answer is satisfactory or not.
Anne Conway first argues that spirit and body do not differ in essence but rather only differ in degree. She argues that they differ in degree “based on the intimate union or bond that exists between spirits and bodies, by means of which spirits control the bodies they are united with, moving them around and using them as instruments in their various operations.” She furthers her argument by pushing against Descartes theory of a “vital fit” she suggests rather that this would not require a spirit to have such an organized body. She argues that if it were true that the spirit and the body differed entirely then when the spirit moved it would leave the body behind because they differ so much. Instead Conway thinks that the spirit and body work like a ship and its sails, in that the sails move the ship along much like the spirit moves the body along. If
…show more content…
But if the spirit had nothing corporeal about it then why does it hurt when the body is hurt? It isn’t possible to say that only the body feels it because the soul is the thing that moves the body and causes senses in it. Therefore, one must accept that that the soul is of one nature with the body although the soul is more swift and has various other perfections. Furthermore, there are substances that are so finely divided that they can’t be held in by the bodies. Therefore, my argument that the spirit would escape like steam is not true because the spirit is not finely divided enough to escape, it is lumpier on the scale than other bodies that can

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This belief in philosophy that the mind, soul, or conscious is independent from the body is referred to as Cartesian dualism; in other words, if the body dies the mind does not. Trying to distinct the mind from the body has been a topic in philosophy since Rene Descartes, one of the most influential founders. In one of Descartes first essays, the ‘Second Meditation: Of the Human Mind’, he wrote about how he believed that the mind and the body were two separate entities and self is distinct from the body. On the other hand, there are plenty of respected philosophers that believe Descartes’s look on our mind and body is wrong; these people call themselves Anti-Cartesians. Sir Peter Strawson, a very well-known Anti-Cartesian stated, the mind is…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Actually, in the interim I absolutely concur with it, I am additionally puzzled about it. The reality of the matter is that the soul, in the event that it is genuine, is most likely non-physical. What I don't acknowledge is having the capacity to think about something you never observed or touched. How might you consider something you have no clue about what it is, something you can't speak to? How might you be so sure of its reality?…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the annals of American religious history, spiritualism sits uncomfortably alongside fundamentalism and other conventional forms of religion that command largest portion of scholars’ attention. Ann Braude’s Radical Spirits was one of the first narratives written that documents this important but slighted movement. To the surprise of both nineteenth-century observers and contemporary scholars alike, spiritualists were consumed by the prospect of communication with the dead. Braude provides examples throughout her work of how this group of unique individuals channeled the dead through spirit mediums and/or in séances. She also provides examples detailing individuals’ claims that the dead responded with thumping, knocking and involuntary writing, and how the departed have made personal appearances in the form of spirit control and manipulation during hypnotic trances.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Six Meditations by Descartes offer valuable insight into the differences between the mind and the body. Through his discussion he demonstrates to us that the mind and body are two distinct things that could potentially exist without one another. The dialogue Monday Night puts many of the claims made by Descartes through many tests. They question many of the ideas that Descartes presents, and both explain and shoot down his ideas. The ideas demonstrated in the Meditations are confusing and absurd and don’t prove a distinction between the mind and body.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is clear that Conway makes this distinction- that spirit and matter are modes of the same substance, and not to be considered as substances themselves- so she can develop…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The underlying reason for the soul being a special material is that it affects not just our daily bodily processes, but also immaterial things (i.e. sensations of love, happiness, betrayal that are not tied down to one specific part of the body). This is significant because he means that if a person were to lose his arm, he would still be able to experience things like love and happiness. Even though he has lost part of the body (and therefore some little part of the soul that caused sensations in his arm), the rest of his soul remains intact so he is not deprived of the feeling of other sensations. In this sense, the body cannot produce sensation on its own and needs the soul. In this way, the soul acts upon the body (i.e. causes/creates sensations that can be felt), but it is also dependent on the body because the body acts on the soul through providing a vehicle for things to be felt; after death, the body ceases to exist and the soul has nothing through which to furnish sensations.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The subject of philosophy is a study that can be viewed in many different ways. Some ways vary in extremes from one another, but they all wish to pursue the same thing; the understanding of knowledge and human excellence. One of the most popular arguments is the comparison of mind and body. Through this paper I will go in depth on the individuals theories and discoveries, then compare them using the ideas from Plato’s Phaedo and Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy. Both philosophers share the same ideas on dualism, and believe the body to be inferior to the mind and/or soul.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism vs Materialism The mind/body problem, the question of what is the relationship between the mind and the body, is commonly seen as a key issue in the philosophy of the mind (Sober, 2013, p. 204). The two categories of views discussed in Sober’s ‘Core Questions in Philosophy’ that attempt to resolve the mind/body problem are dualism and materialism. Dualism is the theory that the mind and the brain are two fundamentally different substances (Sober, 2013, p. 204). Conversely, materialism says that matter is the one and only fundamental substance in nature, and the notion that mental phenomena are a result of physical interactions follows (Sober, 2013, p. 204).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In John Perry’s “A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality,” there are many arguments that discuss the criterion of personal identity. Within The First Night, Gretchen Weirob and Sam Miller begin to discuss the idea of an immaterial soul and its reasonability of existence, which is the main idea. Miller discusses the various reasons why an immaterial soul exists while Weirob argues its existence and eventually, its relevance. Throughout the dialogue, Miller introduces various theories to support the idea of an immaterial soul and its use of allowing the survival of a person after death. His main theory represents the principle of “Same body, same self” (Perry, 325) otherwise discussed as “same body, same soul.”…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scientists are aware of our body composition including the complexity of our body parts. How we in fact see, hear, and feel is all explainable via scientific discoveries regarding the human body. To think that our spiritual body or soul is still able to see and hear is quite astonishing. Perhaps this further strengthens the acceptance of a soul and that as created beings we are more than the sum of our physical body parts, much, much more.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Searle and Descartes being separated by nearly four centuries provides a rough landscape for a philosophical discussion to be conducted upon. Both Searle and Descartes have inherent biases based upon their location on the timeline, Searle with modern science and Descartes with religion and the church. Being that the two are opposed, I think that Searle is able to articulate effectively his positions and respond to Descartes’ claims properly. If positioned at the same location along the timeline and granted the knowledge that Searle possess, I think that Descartes, assuming he had an open mind, would agree with Searle’s propositions and subsequent conclusion.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Soul Analysis

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They use this example to prove that spirit is different from appetite. They then try to prove that spirit is different from rationality with the example of small children. They claim that small children are full of spirit straight from birth, however many children never acquire rational thought, thus creating separation from one of the other 2 parts of the soul. With this logic they are able to infer that spirit is the third part of the soul. I believe that the argument that the soul can be split into three parts is completely incorrect.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abstract on “The Bodily Unconscious in Freud’s Three Essays ” The article, “The Bodily Unconscious in Freud’s Three Essays,” acts as a continuance on Freud’s theory of the unconscious. The author, John Russon, defends Freud’s theory, expands, and gives his own criticisms. The article is broken down into four sections pertaining to The Body as a Prototype for the Real, The Family as a Category of Experience, The Unconscious Desire of the Other, and Objectivity and Method. Throughout the piece Russon makes a great point to link the unconscious to phenomenology.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Intellect:Mind over Matter, Mortimer Adler probes the relationship between the mind and the body. He describes the four main theories regarding this relationship and separates them into two categories: extreme and moderate. Among the four theories, Adler argues in favor of moderate immaterialism. His argument is easily the most convincing as it accounts for the essential difference between man and animal, our intellect, while acknowledging the congruity between the mind and body.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays