capital punishment Essay
On 16 February 2003 the Australian PM said in a Sunday morning television interview that the Bali bombers “should be dealt with in accordance with Indonesian law. …and if [the death penalty] is what the law of Indonesia provides, well, that is how things should proceed. There won’t be any protest from Australia”.
In early March 2003 the PM told US television that he would welcome the death penalty for Osama Bin Laden. “I think everybody would”, Mr Howard said.
In response to these comments:
"Foreign Minister Alexander Downer said Australia would not intervene if bin Laden was to be executed. 'I personsally have never supported the death penalty buit int he case of Osama bin …show more content…
Even Mr Howard’s own government has in the past consistently condemned the use of the death penalty. As recently as August 2002, in response to Nigeria’s use of the death penalty, the Australian Foreign Minister, Mr Alexander Downer, issued a media release stating that:
The Australian Government is universally and consistently opposed to the use of capital punishment in any circumstances. The death penalty is an inhumane form of punishment which violates the most fundamental human right: the right to life. 
This policy was restated in December 2002 when the death penalty was handed down to an Australian citizen convicted of drug trafficking in Vietnam.
Prime Minister Howard and the death penalty
Prime Minister Howard is on the record as an opponent of the death penalty. In a doorstop in 2001, for example, the Australian Prime Minister said that he had “a pragmatic opposition to the death penalty that is based on the belief that from time to time the law makes mistakes and you can’t bring somebody back after you’ve executed them”.
Since the Bali bombing in October 2002, an event that deeply