Why Should College Athletes Should Not Be Paid?

1038 Words 5 Pages
Athletes that are participating in NCAA sports already receive enough money through scholarships and other types of indirect payment. Why should they be paid a salary for their athletic abilities? These athletes receive many types of indirect payment from the school when they are enrolled in school and playing a sport there. They receive scholarships that pay for parts of their tuition; that covers a very expensive part of college. Athletes also receive free room and board from the school. This covers a very stressful and expensive part of enrolling in college. In addition to that, some of these athletes are receiving a prepaid meal plan that will provide them with food when they are enrolled in the college. They won’t have to pay for their main source of food throughout college. Despite the belief that NCAA athletes should be paid, they don’t need to …show more content…
This supports the claim that college athletes should not be paid directly. The NCAA has always put academics first in the lives of student-athletes in college. This is the main reason as to why these athletes aren’t paid directly. The main quality that the NCAA insists “is a crucial to preserving an academic environment in which acquiring a quality education is the first priority”(Neuhauser, Alan). The education of the student-athlete should be held at a higher standard than their athletics. If athletes were to be paid, the NCAA feels that these athletes would not care about their education and only focus on getting better at their respective sport and then earn more money. Athletes that participate in sports through the NCAA may not “profit off merchandise, no practicing with professional teams, no hiring of agents or private advisers and most certainly no salary” (Neuhauser, Alan). These athletes focusing on an education before their sports are why they don’t need to be paid to play sports though the

Related Documents