Why Is Voluntary Euthanasia Wrong

Improved Essays
What makes the patient lose the will to live in the endless suffering, for both the patient and the patient's family. Endless pain from illness or treatment brings suffering to the patient, which is also one of the reasons that voluntary euthanasia is morally different than murder. The murderer might kill a man, who has a good paying job, get married and has two children and his wife living together in a big house. The murderer doesn't only take away the man's life but also takes away the pillar of the family, the father of two children and the husband of a woman. However, voluntary euthanasia might be the way to stop the patient and the patient’s family from being distressing. Ordinary people really have no way to feel the pain that a hopeless patient feels. We don’t know how it feels when your body gets surgery for more than once; we have never experienced there is a “time bomb” inside of the body and the “bomb” is going to explode anytime; we don't understand how desperate for a person give up being alive. Suffering really knocks a person down not only physically but also mentally. We, people, are unable to empathize with not even 1% of the pain the patient has. Therefore, the society and people can’t judge if voluntary euthanasia is morally right or wrong. …show more content…
Only voluntary euthanasia is morally different than murder or suicide because of the value of autonomy. Also, choosing to have voluntary euthanasia needs courage, so patients who seek for euthanasia, are not afraid of death; however, endless suffering and pain are more terrifying than death. Therefore, we can't use morality to judge euthanasia based on its action or its purpose. Only patients and doctors are qualified to determine whether to carry out

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Recent stories in the news have posed this controversial question: should terminally ill patients have the right to end their own lives? Empathetic stories of terminally ill patients’ last wishes have captured attention of the media and created a controversial debate on the ethics and morals of physician assisted suicide, otherwise known as PAS. Some claim that PAS is inhumane and unethical, while others insist that it is a given right to anybody under such extreme circumstances. In his article, “Physician-Assisted Suicide Is Always Wrong,” Ryan T. Anderson attempts to convey to citizens and policymakers that legalizing PAS across the country would be a grave mistake. However, Anderson’s argument is weak due to a series of logical fallacies…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This begs the question, “is it right to kill another to deliver them from their misery”. . Medically, euthanasia is the right choice and depicted as an act of grace. Ethically, it’s wrong and seen as a nefarious exercise. Euthanasia is seen as a way to ease the pain, but it doesn't change the fact its murder. This practice is improper and considered a stain on modern medical science.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many different of points of view when it comes to the topic and discussion of euthanasia. Euthanasia is the ‘mercy killing’ of someone in order to relieve some type of great pain or suffering. (White 148) Conducting my opinion on this topic was rather difficult, because there are many different circumstances to consider when arguing for or against euthanasia. I agree completely with the idea of Voluntary Euthanasia, which is the mercy killing of someone with their consent.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia Be Legalized

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages

    People who are suffering and essentially at death’s doorstep should have the power to choose and should not have to fight for their right against a group of people’s individual beliefs. Many also argue the euthanasia should be illegal because it will eventually lead to a slope of people who will take advantage of it. Euthanasia has been granted to patients with diseases such as Alzheimer 's and depression which are purely mental, non painful disorders which should not qualify. The power to inflict death will only lead to a negative effect on society. Even though some disorders are not physically painful does not mean they do not cause mental suffering.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For everyone immediately involved with the terminally ill patient, it seems the most happiness would come from helping them and doing whatever is needed to make sure they are no longer suffering. The family and friends would know they are no longer suffering, same with the nurses and doctors. They would also know this is what they wanted, they either wanted it because they wanted to die with dignity, they wanted to go on their own terms, not the diseases, or they could not deal with the pain and or not being able to care for themselves at all. But an argument for the wrongness is that the doctors and nurses fight to keep their patients alive, not to assist them in suicide and although we could all understand this there is more to look at when talking about them. Doctors and nurses main goal might be to save lives, but it is also to make sure that their patient is comfortable and living out the rest of their life no matter how short or long the best way they can.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Euthanasia Wrong

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Almost every person on this earth has a heard of the term euthanasia to some degree. Even though there are many different forms of euthanasia the most common is when a person askes to be killed in a painless manor most times because of an untreatable illness. For most people there decision on whether it’s right or wrong have to do with their own morals or religion. In this paper I will be taking a stand on whether or not I feel euthanasia is right, while also showing how ethics places a part in it. Out of the many different theories such as Virtue Ethics, Natural Law Theory, Utilitarianism, or Deontological Ethical Theory ext.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some consider euthanasia to be indecent and others say that it is murder. Euthanasia should be legalized in light of the fact that it gives an opportunity to diminish agony, conveys alleviation to a person…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay, I will contend that Brock’s argument in favor of the moral permissibility of voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) is sound and that Brock offers persuasive responses to the objection that (A) VAE is an act which involves the deliberate killing of an innocent person and (B) the deliberate killing of an innocent person is always morally wrong. To achieve this, I will begin by summarizing Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE. Then, I will synthesize the objection to Brock’s argument and Brock’s subsequent responses. Finally, I will describe why I find Brock’s responses persuasive. Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE can be constructed as follows: (1) VAE is supported by the “values of patient well-being…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As I read through the articles posted on D2L on legalizing Euthanasia, I believe that this law is ethical, euthanasia does not infringe on anyone's rights and therefore does no harm. Young children who are suffering on the verge of death should have the option to decide if they want to use this painless practice on themselves, so they wouldn't have to sacrifice their lives on suffering anymore, it will end the suffering of the dying. Only we can control the direction of our own lives by our own will, only we have the option to live our lives and predict our own course through life when suffering. It also gives us the basic right to decide how we die. If children will not get the physical help they need to make them stay alive from the illnesses, or even if this treatment doesn't cure them…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those who argue for euthanasia believe that it is an acceptable practice because everyone has the right to die. In addition, euthanasia relieves the elderly, cancer patients, and victims of diseases of their pain. Instead of forcing the victims of these diseases to live the rest of their lives in pain and suffering,…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Borderline Between Murder And Help The problem of euthanasia is not new, its history begins in ancient times, and even then it caused much controversy among doctors, lawyers, sociologists, psychologists, and so on. The attitude to deliberately accelerating death of a terminally ill, even for the purpose of termination of his suffering has never been straightforward. English philosopher Francis Bacon to refer to an easy painless death brought the term - "euthanasia" (from the Greek. euthanasia, eu - well, thanatos - death) i.e. good, quiet and easy death, without pain and suffering.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is becoming a popular controversial topic in today’s society. Some people view it as a personal choice, while others may think it is morally wrong. Dating back several decades, euthanasia has always been present, however today we must address the controversy of it. Euthanasia is not only a moral question, but it is also a question of legality.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the debate over if euthanasia is moral, the opponents conclude that it is not because it infringes upon human beings natural drive to survive. On the other side of the debate, the supporters conclude that it is when two things are taken into consideration which are: injury and preference. In this essay, I will conclude that euthanasia is morally right solely when the two conditions are followed. It is morally correct because in order for euthanasia to be performed conditions have to be met.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If death is destined due to sickness, then the patient should be able to decide whether they want a peaceful death or a painful death. Patients who are suffering from an incurable disease, or any kind of disability do not deserve to suffer and legalizing euthanasia can help cure their suffering since not many want to live after a period of time when the patient and the doctor knows that it is too late and nothing further can be done to improve the patient’s condition, or relieve their pain. She could not end her life on her own terms, so instead she suffered: a crippling stroke; massive blood loss after an angiogram; dialysis; constant hospitalization; and mistreatment by staff. Month after month, she sank further into despair (Hayes). This excerpt is from an article where its author Mathew Hayes describes the condition and suffering that his grandmother had to go through before she reached the end of it.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays