John Hardwig Arguments Against Euthanasia

Improved Essays
There are many different of points of view when it comes to the topic and discussion of euthanasia. Euthanasia is the ‘mercy killing’ of someone in order to relieve some type of great pain or suffering. (White 148) Conducting my opinion on this topic was rather difficult, because there are many different circumstances to consider when arguing for or against euthanasia. I agree completely with the idea of Voluntary Euthanasia, which is the mercy killing of someone with their consent. (White 150) If someone is lying in a bed suffering and can no longer endure the pain, and there is no medication to make them comfortable or better, who should be able to tell them that they have to suffer? While at the same time I disagree with Nonvoluntary Euthanasia, …show more content…
The first statement that Hardwig made that I thought was beyond absurd, “In fact, a fairly common argument against legalizing physician-assisted suicide is that if it were legal, some people might somehow get the idea that they have a duty to die.” (White 178) I strongly disagree with Hardwig’s opinion on the idea of someone having a “duty to die.” Euthanasia is offered to a patient who no longer has any chance of living and is only offered when absolutely necessary. This would in no way influence a person into thinking they have to die. Euthanasia gives someone who is suffering an easy and painless way to die, so the person no longer has to suffer. I don’t see how euthanasia influences a person into thinking that it is there duty to die. Another argument that made me completely disagree with Hardwig’s point of view is, is idea that one will become a burden to their loved ones. (White 181) This statement made me think of my Mother because she always says she never wants us to have to care for her, she is in fact a very independent person. My mother and I always disagree on this because I think that since she has taken care of me for eighteen years now, I owe her the least. I also think that I could never view her as a burden on my life. I don’t think anyone, who truly loves their family member, could view them as a “burden.” I completely disagree with everything that Hardwig tried to argue, and I think to say the least, he contradicts himself quite

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proponents of euthanasia argue that it should be legal for patients to have the option to relief themselves of suffering and unbearable pain. Those patients should be offered to terminate their lives for various reasons one being the right to die. Every human being has many rights and one being the right to die if one wants to end their life they should have that option. If the patient is tired of fighting a battle with an illness, tired of…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the following point is one that many fail to address, yet to me, it seems to be one of the most significant ones. Many euthanasia opponents focus on the doctors, and how “morally wrong” the doctor’s actions are according to their beliefs; but these people fail to realize that euthanasia isn’t about the doctor, religious views or moral standards,, euthanasia is about the patient. The patient who is tired of living and just wants to die. As Dr. Marcia Angell asked, "Why should anyone -- the state, the medical profession, or anyone else -- presume to tell someone else how much suffering they must endure as their life is ending?" (Haberman Online).…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia, also known as doctor assisted suicide, and whether or not if it should be legalized is a very controversial. Euthanasia essentially is permission for doctors to end the lives of terminally ill people to end that pain. It being a very debatable topic some may argue that if there is no positive signs in sight then rather the patient suffer; end it. On the other hand is is arguable that life is valuable so live it through completely, and doctors being given the option of ending live devalues life. Personally, I believe under the right circumstances euthanasia is acceptable, especially if the victim of the suffering is asking to put an end to it as well.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is when you kill someone out of mercy or to stop them from suffering. In Australia it is currently illegal to kill someone out of mercy. But euthanasia should be legalised. People are living their lives with unbearable pain, they have the right to die peacefully and painlessly. It is a person’s choice if they want to suffer or not it is not immoral to end someone’s pain.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why do you think that there is a debate over euthanasia? Why do you think that people participate in euthanasia? Euthanasia is when a doctor helps a person commit suicide, this is often called doctor assisted suicide. The reason this is up for debate is because people disagree with the fact that doctors are helping people commit suicide. Euthanasia is wrong in many ways.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By taking a Utilitarian perspective on this issue, it appears to be exceedingly wrong to take away a person’s control over their own life. It is that freedom of personal autonomy and the absence of suffering that sets the Utilitarian view of Euthanasia apart from others. Utilitarianism grants us the permission to accept such a death as morally…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We live in the year 2015, and still it is illegal to grant an individual in need the right to a peaceful departure. Euthanasia offers patients the option to leave their life happier than they would have been otherwise. Furthermore, it is a decision that a patient should be given the right to in times of intense suffering, considering that it is their own life. Finally, the absence of euthanasia has denied so many the end that they have desired through years of…

    • 1266 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sherika Sinclair Period 7 Final edit Euthanasia is the act of helping end a person's life to relieve suffering. There are solid debates on whether to make euthanasia legal in the United States. It is a way to help end the prolonged suffering of patients who are terminally ill or in an irreversible coma. Euthanasia should become legal because it will end suffering, it is less expensive, people should have the right to end their life, no one should be forced to stay alive, and the government should not have the right over people’s lives.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1.Discuss at least three components of hospice care. Then, compare these elements to other forms of life options. What form of end-of-life care would you want for yourself? Why? (SLO 4c: Chapter 6)…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States of America, the legality of physician-assisted suicide or “Active Euthanasia” has been the topic of a highly debated political controversy. Whether there is a morally relevant difference between “Active Euthanasia” and “Passive Euthanasia”, or more simply between doing and allowing harm is at the center of this dispute. Two American philosophers, James Rachels and Bonnie Steinbock share their outlooks on the topic in their essays Active and Passive Euthanasia (1975) and The Intentional Termination of Life (1979). Steinbock argues that Rachels has misinterpreted the standard view on the subject, or the view in which the American Medical Association has published, and refutes Rachel 's conclusion. However, Rachel 's provides…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    No person should have to endure terminal suffering that is unremitting, unbearable, or prolonged. When the burdens of life outweigh the benefits because of uncontrollable pain, severe psychological suffering, loss of dignity, or loss of quality of life as judged by the patient, and when the circumstances are not remediable, the dying person should be able to ask for and receive help in assisted suicide (Marker, Smith 47-51). It is further argued that assisted suicide for incurably ill persons experiencing extreme suffering can be distinguished from euthanasia used for the purpose of genocide on the grounds that it is based on principles of dignity, honor, and respect and is chosen and enacted by the dying individuals, rather than being forced on them against their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gay-Williams stated that Euthanasia is unnatural because it works against a human’s self-interest. I feel like he is generalizing patients when he brought up that point because while there is a possibility of remission it is not the case for all patients. Additionally, he states that the practice of Euthanasia can lead to a ‘slippery slope’. A slippery slope is synonymous to the phrase “one thing led to another”. It is when one actions causes another action to take place.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They will have many reasons as to why they believe that it is wrong such as religious reasons or that they believe life is sacred and that it shouldn’t be taken away no matter what. In some cases like the one in the article Active Euthanasia Is Never Morally Justified by Doug McManaman “It is never justified to intentionally bring an end to human life in order to relieve one of a burdensome existence” (McManaman). What McManaman is saying here is basically that it is not right for a person to end their life no matter what they are going through or how they feel in this case. He uses the word burdensome as anything that makes someone uncomfortable that gets in their way of living with this article. These people who argue to keep euthanasia illegal don’t know what the patients are going through and they should realize that the patient knows what is best for them.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia, also known as death with honor or dignity is used to help patients who are suffering from a disease that cannot be cured. When doctors see no hope of cure in a patient’s health, the treatment becomes too painful euthanasia helps, in euthanasia doctors can drug the patient suffering with lethal and put them to sleep.. It is every human’s natural right to decide whether they wish to live or die, especially in the situation where there is no hope for cure. Legalizing Euthanasia can put an end to miserable sufferings of patients in need. It is a way to reduce further treatments that do not guarantee cure and rather cause more pain to the patient.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays