Introduction The aim and purpose of this reply will be evaluate Mr. Tullis’ analytical content inspection of both the models and the issues of resources, analyze the overall quality of a reply, and provide an alternative biblical principle for the purpose of bringing greater clarity to the issues under discussion. Scriptural analysis will provided the foundation for the discussion of an extended biblical principle. While, the author of this reply will utilize scholarly resources to validate the contest findings of the work and provide positive feedback on Mr. Tullis’ thread.
Analysis of Content Mr. Tullis’ inspection and discussion of the economic model and the voluntary spirit model was thorough and accurate - as his discussion of the models explored each model’s assumptions, resource acquisition, and resource usage length (Lori & Patricia, …show more content…
Tullis’ inspection of the economic and voluntary spirit models was academically well constructed and appraised, Mr. Tullis’ biblical discussion of charitable donations and volunteerism was lacking in scholarly structure and tone (Tullis, 2017). In other words, Mr. Tullis’ contest was acceptable, but his presentation lacked necessary continuity - thus, creating a disjointed biblical concept (Tullis, 2017). To bring clarity to this issue, the author of this reply will build upon the foundation of Mr. Tullis’ thread - by further examining the biblical principle of love. A full contextual inspection of the biblical principle of love demonstrates that love is both an action and sacrifice. For example, in the Gospel of Mark, Jesus reveals that the greatest commandment is love. “ [A scribe asked] ‘Which commandment is the most important of all?’ Jesus answered…‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength. The second is this[, y]ou shall love your neighbor as yourself. There is no other commandment greater than [to love God and
Analysis of Content Mr. Tullis’ inspection and discussion of the economic model and the voluntary spirit model was thorough and accurate - as his discussion of the models explored each model’s assumptions, resource acquisition, and resource usage length (Lori & Patricia, …show more content…
Tullis’ inspection of the economic and voluntary spirit models was academically well constructed and appraised, Mr. Tullis’ biblical discussion of charitable donations and volunteerism was lacking in scholarly structure and tone (Tullis, 2017). In other words, Mr. Tullis’ contest was acceptable, but his presentation lacked necessary continuity - thus, creating a disjointed biblical concept (Tullis, 2017). To bring clarity to this issue, the author of this reply will build upon the foundation of Mr. Tullis’ thread - by further examining the biblical principle of love. A full contextual inspection of the biblical principle of love demonstrates that love is both an action and sacrifice. For example, in the Gospel of Mark, Jesus reveals that the greatest commandment is love. “ [A scribe asked] ‘Which commandment is the most important of all?’ Jesus answered…‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength. The second is this[, y]ou shall love your neighbor as yourself. There is no other commandment greater than [to love God and