Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics

Improved Essays
In many of the world’s major religions, political systems, and moral foundations, resource sharing is synonymous with the concepts of compassion and generosity. Many people would agree that we are morally obligated to abide by the Golden Rule and do for others as we would do for ourselves. Although many would agree that generosity and compassion through resource sharing is just, one question lingers- is it realistic? In his essay, “Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor,” Garrett Hardin argues that not only is resource sharing unrealistic, but that it can also be detrimental, as it stretches available finite resources to the point of ruin.
The thesis of Hardin’s argument is that people living in rich nations should do nothing for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What duty do we have to help those who might otherwise starve without our intervention? Is it our responsibility to help our fellow man in need or are we free to stand on the sidelines? Philosophers Jan Narveson and Peter Singer offer contrasting viewpoints on the moral obligations affluent nations have to aid and support the poor. Where Singer reasons that by having the privilege of living in nations of wealth, this benefit carries with it the moral obligation to help those around the world who are sentenced to live in absolute poverty, if only because of where fate had them born. In response, Narveson argues Singer is mistaken: our responsibility and duty first lies to our circle and we should never insist that others take the responsibility…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Garrett Hardin (1915-2003) – He was a known scholar who took the fields of ecology and microbiology. One of his major works that was accomplished during his lifetime was an essay called, “The Tragedy of the Commons” in 1968. It delves into problems that will be and is currently being encountered by the human race about our excessive overuse of Earth's resources and its increase from the rising population. This had an impact in that it led into multiple debate and addressing of political issues.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These two examples, though different in nature, relate to Hardin’s theory of the tragedy of commons by promoting themes of self-interest, limited resources, and sacrifice. In The Tragedy of the Commons, by Garrett Hardin, humans putting their own self-interest before the good of their community is referenced multiple times. On page 2, Hardin describes the growing problem with overpopulation, discussing how, in his mind, it would seem that parents who have more children would be less capable of giving their children the proper care that a parent with fewer children could. Hardin believes that this would cause them to leave fewer descendants in the long run, however, he then goes on to discuss that since “our society is deeply committed to the ‘welfare state’,” this can never be the case.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life Boat Ethics Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Garrett Hardin, the author of this essay, is trying to explain this topic as survival of the fittest by saying that the wealthier countries and the people that…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Singer’s premises are so judiciously phrased that it invites non-consequentialist acceptance. Moreover Singer applies the principle to a simple experiment which offers clarity in comparing the moral significance: “If I am walking past a shallow pond and see a child drowning in it, I ought to wade in and pull the child out. This will mean getting my clothes muddy but this is insignificant, while the death of the child would presumably be a very bad thing." (Singer, 1972). It can be assumed that one’s ethical views are of little to no import, when wet and muddy clothes are entirely insignificant compared to death of a child.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyday millions of people around the world suffer in circumstances, in which they could die from lack of proper care and resources. In Famine, Affluence, and Morality, Peter Singer acknowledges this issue facing humanity and argues for the moral obligation to give large amounts of money to those in need. Singer believes that all who are able should be giving up many, if not all of their luxuries to help give the less fortunate their necessities. I will begin by summarizing the argument that Singer dictates in his article and then explain my reasoning for believing his notions to be sound and valid.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Intro) Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” and Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat ethics” are contradictory philosophical works that examine whether scarce resources should be shared with the poor. Singer’s argument is that “suffering and death from lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad" (Singer, 1972); therefore all people become morally obligated to help the poor. While Hardin argues that ethics of a Lifeboat should be followed because there is a finite amount of resources available at our disposal (Hardin, 1974, pp.566). Both authors take extreme positions by providing opposing arguments on whether we should be involved in helping the famine or not. This essay will analyze the rational of both authors’ while trying…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article, “The Life You Can Save,” Singer displays how many Americans have the means to send money to help those suffering from poverty and terrible living conditions, concluding that if a person does not donate thousands of dollars to aid agencies, they are doing something morally wrong. However, in objection to Singer’s arguments, John Arthur points out that if a person must do what creates the most good, then they are therefore morally wrong when not donating organs to other people, an illogical concept that contradicts Singer’s greater moral evil rule. While Singer may be able to rebut the objection points, he cannot deny the foundation of the objection, therefore rendering his argument invalid. One of the arguments that leads Singer…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    My response the to the counter claim is the same response I have for Hardin, in that the logic and metaphors being used are flawed and fail to consider many other significant and integral factors. The poor can help themselves with the aid provided by wealthier nations they just require it in different forms such as infrastructure as opposed to outright resources. Furthermore, the wealthy are more capable of defending their own interests by ensuring the interests of other nations and should also do so simply out of their humanity.…

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In life we are faced with a series of “big questions”. These questions answer whether we are decently moral people. The ‘big question” we are going to tackle is ‘are we under an obligation to save lives?’ If so, what is required of us to be a morally decent person? In “The Gift” by Parker we learn that Zell Kravinsky would take a utilitarian approach to this question.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer discusses the moral obligation of humans to prevent bad things from happening. In particular, Singer focuses on the prevention of the famine in East Bengal during November 1971 where many people were dying from poverty. Singer argues that since global poverty may be inhibited through charitable donations, then individual people ought to be morally obligated to donate what Singer defines as their surplus of money to charities that will aid impoverished nations. Singer writes his article in the format of a thought experiment, in which he presents a number of generally agreeable premises that lead up to his conclusion which is to donate as much money to charity as what Singer determines is reasonable.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, Peter Singer begins with the assumption that famine should be eradicated, based upon the generally wide held principle that the suffering created by lack of food is bad. He then sets up the general basis for his argument which is: “if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable importance, we ought, morally, to do it” (Singer 231). From this general idea, Singer outlines the reasons why it is a person’s moral duty to prevent famine and how a person should help alleviate famine, all of which can be backed by the theory of utilitarianism. Singer claims that a person has the duty morally to give in order to prevent something bad from occurring.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics is the philosophical study of morality. In other words, it is the study of what is wrong and right, good or bad. Humanity has been intrigued with the answer to these subject matters for hundreds of years. In that time there have been several philosophers such as Aristotle who have formulated moral theories like Virtue ethics. Not all of these theories are put in practice today but they do help in the solving of moral issues.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction: In the article “Living on a Lifeboat,” Garrett Hardin believes that our obligations to the poor and hungry are metaphors based on the ethics of living on a lifeboat and the tragedy of the common. The ethics of living on lifeboat is based upon the rich and the poor. Rich people are in the lifeboat and poor people are in the sea. The wealthy has only three options in the situation with the poor people.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor”, Hardin argues about “a world that must solve real and pressing problems of overpopulation, hunger and moral duty.” Hardin sets the stage by first giving his analysis on the structure of the world today by describing the earth as a lifeboat rather than a spaceship. He then dives into how population control, the tragedy of the commons and immigration are some of the main reasons for the problems we have today. Hardin argues that simply helping people and giving charitably will not solve these problems. Peter Singer, in “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” seemingly goes against Hardin by saying that “if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays