To What Extent Was The Civil War Predictable?

Improved Essays
Was the Civil War predictable? Did any events indefinitely cause the South to desire a split from the North? The North and the South had a growing tension between them for many reasons, and the northern abolitionists encouraged a Civil War through their actions of protest. Although many Americans were affected minimally by the changes of the nation, abolitionists inevitably foresaw a Civil War because the growing tensions between the North and the South became apparent in political and social changes, slavery issues, and the growing occurrence of rebellions. Political and social changes occurred in many ways, including The Second Great Awakening, Lincoln’s presidential election to office, the way the North and the South dealt with one another, …show more content…
As Henry David Thoreau describes, “The soldier is applauded who refuses to serve in an unjust war by those who do not refuse to sustain the unjust government which makes the war” (Civil Disobedience). Thoreau explains how one disregards the opposing opponent for the sake of refusing to cooperate with the other. The South refuses to agree with the North based off on the differences of their own opinions and their very differently unique ways of life. Their internal problems with one another escalates to another level of unacceptability. They could not put slavery aside to discuss other issues, and this led to slavery becoming the main cause of the Civil War. A war was inevitable, because the Union was like a rubberband being stretched to the limit and then snapping. The weight of slavery was pulling the Union apart, and then it finally snapped after no more amends to the relationship of the North and the South were made, until after the war, during …show more content…
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 brought Missouri into America as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Everything above the Louisiana Purchase Boundary line, with the exception of Missouri, banned slavery. This action resulted in maintaining an equal representation for both the North and the South in the Senate. Following this, the Compromise of 1850 allowed California to be admitted as a free state, however popular sovereignty would be used in the land of the Mexican Cession. This caused controversy within the states. Not long afterwards, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 took place. This repealed the Missouri Compromise. Kansas and Nebraska were both to vote using popular sovereignty to decide on slavery. Both pro-slavery settlers and anti-slavery settlers rushed to the area to gain the upper hand of the states, resulting in absolute chaos. As a result states’ rights and Manifest Destiny played a role in the cause of the Civil War. (kincaid’s class

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    However, when the Dred Scott case declared them unconstitutional, tensions between the North and the South exploded, resulting in a full-blown Civil War once Abraham Lincoln was elected president. Between 1820 and 1854, Congress enacted three compromises to settle the disputes over slavery. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 proposed to regulate slavery in the western territories by clearly defining free and slave territories. In order to maintain a balance of power in the Senate between slave and free states, the act prohibited slavery in new states of the Louisiana Purchase territory North of the 36 30 parallel. It also admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free one.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Though the American Civil War is said to have commenced purely stemming from the issue of slavery, this particular issue involved more than just the slaves and their owners. Politically, the South was deeply involved in its agricultural issues and plantations, while the North was focused on technological and industrial advances. Simply because of the different lifestyles, the South seemed fit for slaves, and due to their everyday jobs, needed more hands to produce all the products that the South was responsible for. The mere issue of slavery tipped the scales on a peaceful nation, throwing the whole country into war. “Although there were serious differences between the sections, all of them except slavery could have been settled through the…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American Civil War began in 1861 and it did not end until 1865. This war was fought between the Union known as the Northern states and the Confederates known as the Southern states to determine whether the South would secede from the United States. The Southern states were determined on spreading slavery to the Western part of the country while the Northerners were trying to prevent this from happening. According to The American Experiment some of the people from the North even wanted to put an end to slavery where it was already occurring. Nevertheless, slavery was not the only cause of the Civil War because several events had been building tension until the conflict eventually commenced.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act was one of the most crucial events leading up to the Civil War. In 1854 the Kansas-Nebraska Act created territories for both Kansas and Nebraska. This gave a chance for people to move slavery to the Midwest. Also, it allowed the territories of Kansas and Nebraska the choice whether they wanted to be a free state, or a slave state. The only problem with this was that there was already a compromise to the location of slavery.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the Missouri Compromise, Nebraska must enter the United States as a free state. Southern states blocked Nebraska from gaining statehood. Senator Stephen Douglas wanted Nebraska to become a state, so he proposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which overturned the Missouri Compromise. Kansas, which was above 36°30' north latitude, would be allowed to decide whether or not to allow slavery by popular sovereignty. The Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the 36°30' north latitude as the deciding line for free or slave states.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The war was destined to take place unless one side decided to back down from the other, which was not going to happen due to the presence of hardliners in both the North and the South. The only way to avoid Civil War was to abolish slavery, the South was not going to let that happen without a fight. They needed slaves in their society and were more than established in their ways. Needless to say, the South did not give up their position on the institution of slavery and they had good reason not to. The Southern economy was basically one of agriculture and the slave population was a very important component to their development.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Passed by Congress in may of 1854, the Kansas Nebraska Act may be the most significant of the Pre-Civil War compromises. It admitted the Kansas and Nebraska as states, but rather than decide whether the territories would become slave or non-slave states based on their location in relation to the 36’ 30° line, they were allowed to choose for themselves. Kansas and Nebraska were not the only ones allowed to decide though, each territory was allowed to choose for itself if it would be a slave or non-slave state. This allowing of territories to choose slave or non-slave is called popular sovereignty. In popular sovereignty the people of the territory vote to decide if they will become a slave state or a non-slave state.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Civil War Looking back at history, it would be easy to say that if someone had done something differently, then the major conflict would have been avoided. Putting oneself in their position is a completely different story. Most of the people involved in major events in history did what they could to prevent to inevitable. The Civil War was just that: inevitable. The United States was bound to run into the conflicts that it did being a newer Country.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction The American Civil war occurred during the years 1861 – 1865, and as stated in the article titled “The Civil War”, it “was the cauldron that created modern America. The war preserved the Union, ending the possibility of the American nation dividing into two or more separate countries, in the process altering the nations politics and government, creating a strong presidency and an increasingly important federal infrastructure” (Finkelman sec. 1) However, the American Civil War did not come without coast, as wars never do, an estimated 620,000 men lost their lives in the line of duty. One of the many, yet major causes of this war, came about through slavery; and the standpoint that the northern states took, wanting to abolish slavery,…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    But was the civil war inevitable? Yes it was. The causes presented in this paper would have eventually caused the civil war later in history even if peace were kept longer; the government was just postponing the inevitable since the country was already clearly divided into two opposing sides by very decisive issues that would only linger until an agreement was reached. Issues like slavery and the economy problem previously explained were very decisive factors since the opinions on these issues of both parties were completely opposing one another. The main problem was that if the beliefs of one party existed the other couldn’t.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction During the 1800s the North and South came to a crossroads; their outlooks on slavery were rather diverse. The South did not wish to lose its moneymaking, comfortable, and rapacious slavery industry, especially plantation slavery. However, on the other hand, the North was rising up with a sense of conviction toward the nature of slavery. The South pursued the expansion of slavery and the North sought its abolishment. Slavery was the most disputed subject in that time.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many differing opinions on war and the motivation to fight in it. In Carl von Clausewitz’s famous document, On War, he goes in depth about his specific views on war. Clausewitz says that the ideology that people feel for the war is what motivates them to fight and this motivation is in direct correlation with the violence in the war, but I believe that it is people’s desire for change that motivates them to fight in the war. Though Clausewitz makes good points throughout On War, I believe that he missed this one. When people are not pleased with their current environment or with something that has happened, they want it to change.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What led to the American Civil War is a topic of debate which lacks a simple answer. There is heated debate whether the war was fought for emancipation or to preserve the Union. Historians can advocate for either argument since both sides have ample evidence to support their respective standpoint. Both Hollywood and scholarship agree that the Civil War is a war to preserve the Union. While the issue of slavery was a massive factor in the war, it was not the defining factor.…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to determine if the Civil War was inevitable, we must first look at what the root cause of the Civil War was. The states seceded from the Union, because they had originally been free and were self governing. Since the federal government started to take powers away from the states, relations between the Southern states and the federal government started to become hostile. Had the federal government allowed the states to be self governing, there would not have been a Civil War, but since the federal government continued to trample on the states rights, they felt they had no choice but to secede. After the colonists fought for their freedom from a tyrannical overarching government, they were free…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays