The Missouri Compromise: The American Civil War

Improved Essays
In the early years of America's history, our leaders did the best they could to prevent conflict amongst themselves. Northern and southern states had to constantly find a middle ground. However, each compromise was only temporary. No one wanted to make a firm decision on sensitive issues that divided the country, such as slavery. The American Civil War was a result of years of neglect to truly resolve the differences between northern and southern states.

In 1819, Missouri applied for statehood. Missouri wanted to become a slave state. At this time, the United States was comprised of eleven slave states and eleven free states, which was perfectly even. The northern states fought hard to keep Missouri from entering the country as a slave state. If this happened, the slave states would have a majority in Congress. Luckily, Senator Henry Clay came up with a solution: the Missouri Compromise.
The following are terms of the Missouri Compromise:
Missouri would enter the United States as a slave state as long as Maine entered as a free state, keeping representation in Congress equal.
In addition, Congress created a dividing line south of Missouri. Territories above parallel 36°30' north
…show more content…
Under the Missouri Compromise, Nebraska must enter the United States as a free state. Southern states blocked Nebraska from gaining statehood. Senator Stephen Douglas wanted Nebraska to become a state, so he proposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which overturned the Missouri Compromise. Kansas, which was above 36°30' north latitude, would be allowed to decide whether or not to allow slavery by popular sovereignty. The Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the 36°30' north latitude as the deciding line for free or slave states. This compromise gave the northern states Nebraska and the southern states a greater possibility of slave-holding states. The Kansas-Nebraska Act would ultimately lead to deeper division and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There was an issue what state would be a free state or slave state. For example: no one knew what state would be free or not free, so they decided to make an act called the Kansas and Nebraska act. The Kansas Nebraska act simply explained that territories newly or already states would determine if their state would be a slave state or free state, which caused tension because if kansas became a slave state it would ruin the missouri compromise. If other states would be slave states it would ignore the wilmot proviso…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Significance of the Missouri Compromise and the Monroe Doctrine The Missouri Compromise and the Monroe Doctrine were two of the most important documents written in the presidency of James Monroe (Shi 2016). Both were received much debate and mixed reviews, but have great significance in American History. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 came about as a result of fear in the South that states added from the western territories would be admitted as free states and cause an imbalance (Shi 2016). At the time, the states were equally divided, eleven slave states and eleven free states.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Passed by Congress in may of 1854, the Kansas Nebraska Act may be the most significant of the Pre-Civil War compromises. It admitted the Kansas and Nebraska as states, but rather than decide whether the territories would become slave or non-slave states based on their location in relation to the 36’ 30° line, they were allowed to choose for themselves. Kansas and Nebraska were not the only ones allowed to decide though, each territory was allowed to choose for itself if it would be a slave or non-slave state. This allowing of territories to choose slave or non-slave is called popular sovereignty. In popular sovereignty the people of the territory vote to decide if they will become a slave state or a non-slave state.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism Dbq

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The increase of sectionalism was an important act formed by the events following the Mexican-American War by causing states to secede, transportation developments, and eventually leading to the start of America’s bloodiest battle, the Civil War. These events led to how America is viewed by people today and what our state’s rights are and will be. By the end of the Mexican-American War, America had gained rights over California and many southern states. Prior to the Mexican-American War, slavery between the states was an ongoing complication that began to cause conflicts. The conflicts created led acts established by the people that became an important statement for why the Mexican-American War and the Civil War were started.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kansas and Nebraska lay within the Louisiana Purchase. This Act divided the Whig party into Norther and Southern wings. The Kansas- Nebraska Act banned the word slavery from the Constitution, the word slavery was treated as a cancer on the public. The Kansas- Nebraska Act the Missouri Compromise prohibited slavery from the latitude 36 degrees 30’ N. Any state above this line was a free state, any state below this line was a state for slavery. In the North Congress made laws against slavery.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Compromise of 1820, also known as the Missouri compromise, was a bill that was formed to create boundaries that split the United States between the Northern free states (non-slavery), and the Southern slave states. The boundary line for slave states and non-slave states was latitude 36°30′(see map below). At the time the northern states economy was industrial, and the southern states economy was more agricultural. For this reason the southern states relied heavily on the use of slaves to farm the land. In 1819 Alabama joined the union as a slave state.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Representative James Tallmadge even tried to propose an amendment which would essentially end slavery, during the time the Missouri request but the effort was defeated. The debate whether Missouri should be a slave or free state occurred for over a year. Northerners argued that Congress than had the power to prohibit slavery while the Southerners said they should have the freedom to choose whether the state should be slave or not. Though after a lot of debate they were soon able to come up with a compromise. The first part of the compromise was Missouri was admitted as a slave state while Maine was a free state.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The people of the United States believed it was their god given right to expand from the Atlantic Ocean, east to the Pacific Ocean, North to Canadian border, and South to Mexico. This idea of Manifest Destiny fueled the expansion into the West. Big indicators of Manifest Destiny were the use of the Oregon Trail, and the Mexican – American War. Despite Manifest Destiny bringing about an increase in sectionalism and conflict, it also allowed for the expansion of territory and fueled movement into the west. With people moving west into the newly claimed territory, there was controversy whether the territories would become free or slave states.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second part was to set the future borders of the Unites States within the Louisiana Purchase establishing a free zone and a slave zone with the hopes that this would settle the issue of what states could be free or slave holding in the future. This compromise only showed that the fracture of national unity was only getting larger and wider apart. As with most compromises, neither side was truly happy with what they had to work with. The South feared that the compromise would “establish the principle that congress could make laws regarding slavery” while the North “condemned it for acquiescing in the expansion of slavery” into the newly expanding nation. Though it did keep the peace in the fragile nation for over thirty years, it was eventually overturned by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not long afterwards, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 took place. This repealed the Missouri Compromise. Kansas and Nebraska were both to vote using popular sovereignty to decide on slavery. Both pro-slavery settlers and anti-slavery settlers rushed to the area to gain the upper hand of the states, resulting in absolute chaos. As a result states’ rights and Manifest Destiny played a role in the cause of the Civil War.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bleeding America The Kansas-Nebraska Act, a act proposed by "Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democratic Senator from Illinois who introduced the Kansas-Nebraska Act"1 in hopes for the nation to build a transcontinental-railroad, hopefully having the eastern terminus in Chicago, but the railroad needed to be secure as it was going to go through the Kansas and Nebraska territories, preferably as states. Being a personal advocate of popular sovereignty, Stephen A. Douglas disliked the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and believed that the state should decide if it wants to be a free-state or a slave-state. Although the North and South were clearly different culturally and economically, separated by their own definition of the American Dream, the passing…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Although popular demand typically determines decisions made within America, the government overrules them in order to get results that they want. Prior to the Kansas-Nebraska Act, America created the Missouri Compromise, which allowed states under the border of Missouri and Missouri itself to be slave states, while anything over the border of Missouri must be free and allowed a ratio of 1:1 slave to free states be admitted into the Union. However, when determining whether Kansas would be a free state or not, the popular sovereignty that ranked highest was for it being a free state. Nevertheless, the government decided to admit Kansas in as a slave state. Not only did this oppose the Missouri Compromise as it broke the geographical line that…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Two years later, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by President Fillmore. This act was much more isolating, splitting the Democratic Party according to sectional interests and increasing the Republican Party. Other than that, it was basically the same as the Compromise of 1850. The struggle between the North and South fighting over Kansas led to people soon flooding into Kansas to fight about slavery, which leads to the “Crime against Kansas”, also known as one of the most famous political historical events. (Senator Charles Sumner talks smack about Preston Brooks relative, and Brooks beats him with a…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri compromise was the supposed to be the purchase of New Orleans. a guy named Henry Clay said instead of buying New Orleans they bought Missouri and when they bought Missouri they made it become into a slave state. They made Maine into a free state that way they can balance the free states and the slave states.…

    • 59 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays